Hi,
The i2c drivers also do not have to set 'owner' field because
i2c_register_driver() will do it instead.
'owner' is removed from i2c drivers, which I was able to compile
with allyesconfig (arm, arm64, i386, x86_64, ppc64).
Only compile-tested.
The coccinelle script which generated the patch was sent here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2029903.html
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Krzysztof Kozlowski (2):
drm/bridge: Drop owner assignment from i2c_driver
drm/rockchip: Drop owner assignment from platform_driver
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 1 -
3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
i2c_driver does not need to set an owner because i2c_register_driver()
will set it.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
---
The coccinelle script which generated the patch was sent here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2029903.html
Changes since v1:
1. Split owner removal from rockchip to separate patch (spotted by Mark
Yao).
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c | 1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
index 1a6607beb29f..be881e9fef8f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ps8622.c
@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ps8622_driver = {
.remove = ps8622_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "ps8622",
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.of_match_table = ps8622_devices,
},
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
index 1b1bf2384815..0ffa3a6a206a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ptn3460.c
@@ -400,7 +400,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ptn3460_driver = {
.remove = ptn3460_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "nxp,ptn3460",
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.of_match_table = ptn3460_match,
},
};
--
1.9.1
platform_driver does not need to set an owner because
platform_driver_register() will set it.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
---
Changes since v1:
1. Split owner removal from rockchip to separate patch (spotted by Mark
Yao).
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
index 01b558fe3695..9a0c2911272a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
@@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_drm_platform_driver = {
.probe = rockchip_drm_platform_probe,
.remove = rockchip_drm_platform_remove,
.driver = {
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
.name = "rockchip-drm",
.of_match_table = rockchip_drm_dt_ids,
.pm = &rockchip_drm_pm_ops,
--
1.9.1
On 2015年07月10日 18:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> platform_driver does not need to set an owner because
> platform_driver_register() will set it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Split owner removal from rockchip to separate patch (spotted by Mark
> Yao).
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> index 01b558fe3695..9a0c2911272a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static struct platform_driver rockchip_drm_platform_driver = {
> .probe = rockchip_drm_platform_probe,
> .remove = rockchip_drm_platform_remove,
> .driver = {
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .name = "rockchip-drm",
> .of_match_table = rockchip_drm_dt_ids,
> .pm = &rockchip_drm_pm_ops,
Thanks for the fix, applied to my drm-next branch, :-)
--
Ｍark