2015-11-02 09:32:33

by Paolo Bonzini

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode



On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>

Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)).

Paolo


2015-11-03 09:40:37

by Laszlo Ersek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode

On 11/02/15 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)).
>
> Paolo
>

Thanks.

Since you can rebase the queue freely, can you please also add:

Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>

to Radim's patch "KVM: x86: handle SMBASE as physical address in RSM"?

Thanks
Laszlo

2015-11-03 10:01:03

by Paolo Bonzini

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode



On 03/11/2015 10:40, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 11/02/15 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
>>
>> Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)).
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Since you can rebase the queue freely, can you please also add:
>
> Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <[email protected]>
>
> to Radim's patch "KVM: x86: handle SMBASE as physical address in RSM"?

Sure, will do.

Paolo