2015-11-05 16:19:23

by SF Markus Elfring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "pinctrl_unregister"

From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:10:22 +0100

The pinctrl_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL
and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c | 3 +--
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 5 +----
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c
index 12a48f4..663ad0a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c
@@ -638,8 +638,7 @@ static int cygnus_gpio_register_pinconf(struct cygnus_gpio *chip)

static void cygnus_gpio_unregister_pinconf(struct cygnus_gpio *chip)
{
- if (chip->pctl)
- pinctrl_unregister(chip->pctl);
+ pinctrl_unregister(chip->pctl);
}

struct cygnus_gpio_data {
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index ef04b96..d24e5f1 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1484,10 +1484,7 @@ static void pcs_irq_free(struct pcs_device *pcs)
static void pcs_free_resources(struct pcs_device *pcs)
{
pcs_irq_free(pcs);
-
- if (pcs->pctl)
- pinctrl_unregister(pcs->pctl);
-
+ pinctrl_unregister(pcs->pctl);
pcs_free_funcs(pcs);
pcs_free_pingroups(pcs);
}
--
2.6.2


2015-11-05 16:53:50

by Ray Jui

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "pinctrl_unregister"


On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:10:22 +0100
>
> The pinctrl_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c | 3 +--
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 5 +----
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c
> index 12a48f4..663ad0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-gpio.c
> @@ -638,8 +638,7 @@ static int cygnus_gpio_register_pinconf(struct cygnus_gpio *chip)
>
> static void cygnus_gpio_unregister_pinconf(struct cygnus_gpio *chip)
> {
> - if (chip->pctl)
> - pinctrl_unregister(chip->pctl);
> + pinctrl_unregister(chip->pctl);
> }
>
> struct cygnus_gpio_data {
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> index ef04b96..d24e5f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> @@ -1484,10 +1484,7 @@ static void pcs_irq_free(struct pcs_device *pcs)
> static void pcs_free_resources(struct pcs_device *pcs)
> {
> pcs_irq_free(pcs);
> -
> - if (pcs->pctl)
> - pinctrl_unregister(pcs->pctl);
> -
> + pinctrl_unregister(pcs->pctl);
> pcs_free_funcs(pcs);
> pcs_free_pingroups(pcs);
> }
>

The change looks good to me, thanks!

Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <[email protected]>

+ Pramod since he's working on changes on the pinctrl-cygnus-gpio driver.

Ray

2015-11-17 10:50:52

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "pinctrl_unregister"

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:17 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:10:22 +0100
>
> The pinctrl_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>

Patch applied with Ray's Review tag.

Yours,
Linus Walleij