Hi Mauro,
This patch depends on the preceding LED core improvements patches
from this patch set, and it would be best if it was merged through
the LED tree. Can I get your ack for this? I've already obtained acks
for the whole set from Sakari.
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
On 10/07/2015 11:10 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> LED subsystem shifted responsibility for choosing between SYNC or ASYNC
> way of setting brightness from drivers to the caller. Adapt the wrapper
> to those changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-flash-led-class.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-flash-led-class.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-flash-led-class.c
> index 5bdfb8d..5d67335 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-flash-led-class.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-flash-led-class.c
> @@ -107,10 +107,10 @@ static void v4l2_flash_set_led_brightness(struct v4l2_flash *v4l2_flash,
> if (ctrls[LED_MODE]->val != V4L2_FLASH_LED_MODE_TORCH)
> return;
>
> - led_set_brightness(&v4l2_flash->fled_cdev->led_cdev,
> + led_set_brightness_sync(&v4l2_flash->fled_cdev->led_cdev,
> brightness);
> } else {
> - led_set_brightness(&v4l2_flash->iled_cdev->led_cdev,
> + led_set_brightness_sync(&v4l2_flash->iled_cdev->led_cdev,
> brightness);
> }
> }
> @@ -206,11 +206,11 @@ static int v4l2_flash_s_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *c)
> case V4L2_CID_FLASH_LED_MODE:
> switch (c->val) {
> case V4L2_FLASH_LED_MODE_NONE:
> - led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF);
> + led_set_brightness_sync(led_cdev, LED_OFF);
> return led_set_flash_strobe(fled_cdev, false);
> case V4L2_FLASH_LED_MODE_FLASH:
> /* Turn the torch LED off */
> - led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF);
> + led_set_brightness_sync(led_cdev, LED_OFF);
> if (ctrls[STROBE_SOURCE]) {
> external_strobe = (ctrls[STROBE_SOURCE]->val ==
> V4L2_FLASH_STROBE_SOURCE_EXTERNAL);
>
Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> This patch depends on the preceding LED core improvements patches
> from this patch set, and it would be best if it was merged through
> the LED tree. Can I get your ack for this? I've already obtained acks
> for the whole set from Sakari.
I agree with this going through the LED tree.
--
Sakari Ailus
[email protected]
On 11/16/2015 10:47 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> This patch depends on the preceding LED core improvements patches
>> from this patch set, and it would be best if it was merged through
>> the LED tree. Can I get your ack for this? I've already obtained acks
>> for the whole set from Sakari.
>
> I agree with this going through the LED tree.
>
Applied this patch set, with fixed version of the patch 4/10 [1],
thanks.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-leds/msg05045.html
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
Em Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:47:58 +0200
Sakari Ailus <[email protected]> escreveu:
> Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> > This patch depends on the preceding LED core improvements patches
> > from this patch set, and it would be best if it was merged through
> > the LED tree. Can I get your ack for this? I've already obtained acks
> > for the whole set from Sakari.
>
> I agree with this going through the LED tree.
Feel free to send it via the LED tree.
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Regards,
Mauro