hi,
I'm trying to add some code to netif_receive_skb function in
dev.c file . The cycles consumed by that code was around 16 cycles on
Dual Core Opetron machine.I'm working on that code for last 6 months
now and the consumed cycles have always been around 16 cycles .I don't
touch any other part of kernel .
But for last 4 days the consumed cycles have suddenly increased to
around 35 cycles . I'm using RDTSC instruction to profile the
code.There is no change in code and the kernel version is also the
same .I am assuming that there must be something wrong with hardware.
Please guide me how can i figure out the root cause.What areas should
i look at to find out the reason for increased number of cycles.I
don't think that there is any issue in kernel because the kernel
version and code is same . Can the the log messages during system
bootup help me to diagnose the problem
shahzad
> But for last 4 days the consumed cycles have suddenly increased to
> around 35 cycles . I'm using RDTSC instruction to profile the
> code.There is no change in code and the kernel version is also the
> same .I am assuming that there must be something wrong with hardware.
>
> Please guide me how can i figure out the root cause.What areas should
Maybe you have a new version of GCC now? (auto-update or something?)
kernel coder wrote:
> hi,
> I'm trying to add some code to netif_receive_skb function in
> dev.c file . The cycles consumed by that code was around 16 cycles on
> Dual Core Opetron machine.I'm working on that code for last 6 months
> now and the consumed cycles have always been around 16 cycles .I don't
> touch any other part of kernel .
>
> But for last 4 days the consumed cycles have suddenly increased to
> around 35 cycles . I'm using RDTSC instruction to profile the
> code.There is no change in code and the kernel version is also the
> same .I am assuming that there must be something wrong with hardware.
..
A cache miss ?
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:31:25 -0800
"kernel coder" <[email protected]> wrote:
> hi,
> I'm trying to add some code to netif_receive_skb function in
> dev.c file . The cycles consumed by that code was around 16 cycles on
> Dual Core Opetron machine.I'm working on that code for last 6 months
> now and the consumed cycles have always been around 16 cycles .I don't
> touch any other part of kernel .
>
> But for last 4 days the consumed cycles have suddenly increased to
> around 35 cycles . I'm using RDTSC instruction to profile the
> code.There is no change in code and the kernel version is also the
> same .I am assuming that there must be something wrong with hardware.
note that profiling a section that takes this short with rdtsc is...
not really working well in practice; you're profiling something that's
smaller (or at least roughly the same size) than the cpu's out of order
speculation window, so your rdtsc greatly impacts what is actually
happening in the code.
as for the change... 16->35 cycles can well be a code or data alignment
change or even a branch misprediction due to some minor code generation
issue.... you're looking at a small microscopic part of the universe
after all, the butterfly in the pacific WILL influence you ;-)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use [email protected]
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org