在 2016/2/20 6:23, Ulf Hansson 写道:
>
> Den 19 feb 2016 3:24 fm skrev "Shawn Lin" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> >
> >
> > Hello Ulf and Adrian,
> >
> > Sorry for delay the new version for this topic. Actually I have no
> > platform available to test phy stuff since v4. Now, I can rework it.:)
> > I remove rpm support from v5 because this patchset just need to focus
> > on phy stuff, which will make the changes more precise. Another reason
> > is that phy_power_on take too much time from rpm, however the power
> profit
> > gained from phy_power_off is little due to the low power mechanism
> with the
> > phy itself observed from experiments.
> >
> > v4 can be found here:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7463251/
> >
> > Note:
> > Phy is mandatory requirement for arasan,sdhci-5.1, so we introduce
> > generic phy support for sdhci-of-arasan.
> >
> >
> > Shawn Lin (2):
> > Documentation: bindings: add description of phy for sdhci-of-arasan
> > mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: add phy support for sdhci-of-arasan
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.txt | 20 ++++++-
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 66
> ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.3.7
> >
> >
>
> This looks good to me! When acks has been received I am ready to queue
> it for next.
>
Hi Adrian,
Any chance to look at this patch? I assume Ulf need your ack for
sdhci* patch. :)
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
On 04/03/16 03:27, Shawn Lin wrote:
> 在 2016/2/20 6:23, Ulf Hansson 写道:
>>
>> Den 19 feb 2016 3:24 fm skrev "Shawn Lin" <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>> >
>> >
>> > Hello Ulf and Adrian,
>> >
>> > Sorry for delay the new version for this topic. Actually I have no
>> > platform available to test phy stuff since v4. Now, I can rework it.:)
>> > I remove rpm support from v5 because this patchset just need to focus
>> > on phy stuff, which will make the changes more precise. Another reason
>> > is that phy_power_on take too much time from rpm, however the power
>> profit
>> > gained from phy_power_off is little due to the low power mechanism
>> with the
>> > phy itself observed from experiments.
>> >
>> > v4 can be found here:
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7463251/
>> >
>> > Note:
>> > Phy is mandatory requirement for arasan,sdhci-5.1, so we introduce
>> > generic phy support for sdhci-of-arasan.
>> >
>> >
>> > Shawn Lin (2):
>> > Documentation: bindings: add description of phy for sdhci-of-arasan
>> > mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: add phy support for sdhci-of-arasan
>> >
>> > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.txt | 20 ++++++-
>> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 66
>> ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> > 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > --
>> > 2.3.7
>> >
>> >
>>
>> This looks good to me! When acks has been received I am ready to queue
>> it for next.
>>
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Any chance to look at this patch? I assume Ulf need your ack for
> sdhci* patch. :)
Just sent some comments.