2016-04-26 13:46:43

by Florian Vallée

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] can: m_can: fix bitrate setup on latest silicon

According to the m_can user manual changelog the BTP register layout was
updated with core revision 3.1.0

This change is not backward-compatible and using the current driver along
with a recent IP results in an incorrect bitrate on the wire.

Tested with a SAMA5D2 SoC (CREL = 0x31040730)

Signed-off-by: Florian Vallee <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
index ef65517..d12b8f2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
@@ -105,6 +105,10 @@ enum m_can_mram_cfg {
MRAM_CFG_NUM,
};

+/* Core Release Register (CREL) */
+#define CRR_REL_MASK 0xfff
+#define CRR_REL_SHIFT 20
+
/* Fast Bit Timing & Prescaler Register (FBTP) */
#define FBTR_FBRP_MASK 0x1f
#define FBTR_FBRP_SHIFT 16
@@ -136,7 +140,7 @@ enum m_can_mram_cfg {
#define CCCR_INIT BIT(0)
#define CCCR_CANFD 0x10

-/* Bit Timing & Prescaler Register (BTP) */
+/* Bit Timing & Prescaler Register (BTP) (M_CAN IP < 3.1.0) */
#define BTR_BRP_MASK 0x3ff
#define BTR_BRP_SHIFT 16
#define BTR_TSEG1_SHIFT 8
@@ -146,6 +150,16 @@ enum m_can_mram_cfg {
#define BTR_SJW_SHIFT 0
#define BTR_SJW_MASK 0xf

+/* Nominal Bit Timing & Prescaler Register (NBTP) (M_CAN IP >= 3.1.0) */
+#define NBTR_SJW_SHIFT 25
+#define NBTR_SJW_MASK (0x7f << NBTR_SJW_SHIFT)
+#define NBTR_BRP_SHIFT 16
+#define NBTR_BRP_MASK (0x3ff << NBTR_BRP_SHIFT)
+#define NBTR_TSEG1_SHIFT 8
+#define NBTR_TSEG1_MASK (0xff << NBTR_TSEG1_SHIFT)
+#define NBTR_TSEG2_SHIFT 0
+#define NBTR_TSEG2_MASK (0x7f << NBTR_TSEG2_SHIFT)
+
/* Error Counter Register(ECR) */
#define ECR_RP BIT(15)
#define ECR_REC_SHIFT 8
@@ -200,6 +214,9 @@ enum m_can_mram_cfg {
IR_RF1L | IR_RF0L)
#define IR_ERR_ALL (IR_ERR_STATE | IR_ERR_BUS)

+/* Core Version */
+#define M_CAN_COREREL_3_1_0 0x310
+
/* Interrupt Line Select (ILS) */
#define ILS_ALL_INT0 0x0
#define ILS_ALL_INT1 0xFFFFFFFF
@@ -357,6 +374,13 @@ static inline void m_can_disable_all_interrupts(const struct m_can_priv *priv)
m_can_write(priv, M_CAN_ILE, 0x0);
}

+static inline int m_can_read_core_rev(const struct m_can_priv *priv)
+{
+ u32 reg = m_can_read(priv, M_CAN_CREL);
+
+ return ((reg >> CRR_REL_SHIFT) & CRR_REL_MASK);
+}
+
static void m_can_read_fifo(struct net_device *dev, u32 rxfs)
{
struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
@@ -814,8 +838,16 @@ static int m_can_set_bittiming(struct net_device *dev)
sjw = bt->sjw - 1;
tseg1 = bt->prop_seg + bt->phase_seg1 - 1;
tseg2 = bt->phase_seg2 - 1;
- reg_btp = (brp << BTR_BRP_SHIFT) | (sjw << BTR_SJW_SHIFT) |
- (tseg1 << BTR_TSEG1_SHIFT) | (tseg2 << BTR_TSEG2_SHIFT);
+
+ if (m_can_read_core_rev(priv) < M_CAN_COREREL_3_1_0)
+ reg_btp = (brp << BTR_BRP_SHIFT) | (sjw << BTR_SJW_SHIFT) |
+ (tseg1 << BTR_TSEG1_SHIFT) |
+ (tseg2 << BTR_TSEG2_SHIFT);
+ else
+ reg_btp = (brp << NBTR_BRP_SHIFT) | (sjw << NBTR_SJW_SHIFT) |
+ (tseg1 << NBTR_TSEG1_SHIFT) |
+ (tseg2 << NBTR_TSEG2_SHIFT);
+
m_can_write(priv, M_CAN_BTP, reg_btp);

if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) {
--
2.7.4


2016-04-26 19:11:48

by Oliver Hartkopp

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: m_can: fix bitrate setup on latest silicon

On 04/26/2016 03:46 PM, Florian Vallee wrote:
> According to the m_can user manual changelog the BTP register layout was
> updated with core revision 3.1.0

Hello Florian,

nice to see a real v3.1.0 user emerging on the mailing list :-)

I wonder whether this small change covers the updates made between
v3.0.1 and v3.1.0.

IIRC

v3.0.1:
NON_ISO operation / general CAN/CANFD and BRS switch in register CCCR
v3.1.0:
ISO operation / per frame CAN/CANFD switch (FDF/BRS bit in TX/RX buffer)
v3.2.x:
Ability to switch ISO/NON_ISO operation (NISO bit on register CCCR)
updated range of NBTP.NTSEG2

The current v3.0.1 driver is fixed to tell to be a NON_ISO controller:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/diff/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c?h=testing

The v3.1.0 is a fixed ISO controller and additional it does not make
sense anymore to configure the CCCR register each time, before sending a
frame:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/tree/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c?h=testing&id=885cc17abad6c3064f266099a6ded2d357012380#n1075

Just as the new TX/RX buffer layout contains a FDF and BRS bits for this
reason.

> +static inline int m_can_read_core_rev(const struct m_can_priv *priv)
> +{
> + u32 reg = m_can_read(priv, M_CAN_CREL);
> +
> + return ((reg >> CRR_REL_SHIFT) & CRR_REL_MASK);
> +}
> +
> static void m_can_read_fifo(struct net_device *dev, u32 rxfs)
> {
> struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
> @@ -814,8 +838,16 @@ static int m_can_set_bittiming(struct net_device *dev)
> sjw = bt->sjw - 1;
> tseg1 = bt->prop_seg + bt->phase_seg1 - 1;
> tseg2 = bt->phase_seg2 - 1;
> - reg_btp = (brp << BTR_BRP_SHIFT) | (sjw << BTR_SJW_SHIFT) |
> - (tseg1 << BTR_TSEG1_SHIFT) | (tseg2 << BTR_TSEG2_SHIFT);
> +
> + if (m_can_read_core_rev(priv) < M_CAN_COREREL_3_1_0)

Your patch looks very good so far. I would appreciate if you could
update the other register changes too as I don't have a hardware to
test. I can provide the ISO/NON_ISO config for the netlink interface
updates then :-)

Best regards,
Oliver

2016-04-27 16:47:13

by Florian Vallée

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: m_can: fix bitrate setup on latest silicon

On 26 April 2016 at 21:11, Oliver Hartkopp <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I wonder whether this small change covers the updates made between
> v3.0.1 and v3.1.0.
>

Probably not, I was mainly interested in fixing basic functionality here :)
(ie: with the default settings we can exchange data frames with
another controller)

>
> Your patch looks very good so far. I would appreciate if you could update the other register changes too as I don't have a hardware to test. I can provide the ISO/NON_ISO config for the netlink interface updates then :-)
>

Ok, I'll have another look at the changes. Thank you for the spec
history btw, it seems bosch only keeps the latest one publicly
available.

Regards,

Florian