2017-03-26 16:24:35

by Nicholas Mc Guire

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: switch to BUG_ON()

Use BUG_ON() rather than an explicit if followed by BUG() for
improved readability and also consistency.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <[email protected]>
---

Found by coccinelle: bugon.cocci
./kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2125:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
./kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2127:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
./kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2143:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.

BUG_ON() wraps the explicit if condition and is actually in use for
all conditional BUG() cases in cpuset.c except in this one function.

Patch was compile-tested with: x86_64_defconfig (implies CONFIG_CPUSETS=y)
(checkpatch warnings for this patch seem to be false-positives - the
BUG_ON should be fine)

Patch is against 4.11-rc3 (localversion-next is next-20170324)

kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 0f41292..8b84db2 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -2121,10 +2121,8 @@ int __init cpuset_init(void)
{
int err = 0;

- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, GFP_KERNEL))
- BUG();
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&top_cpuset.effective_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&top_cpuset.cpus_allowed, GFP_KERNEL));
+ BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&top_cpuset.effective_cpus, GFP_KERNEL));

cpumask_setall(top_cpuset.cpus_allowed);
nodes_setall(top_cpuset.mems_allowed);
@@ -2139,8 +2137,7 @@ int __init cpuset_init(void)
if (err < 0)
return err;

- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_attach, GFP_KERNEL))
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_attach, GFP_KERNEL));

return 0;
}
--
2.1.4


2017-03-27 17:59:48

by Tejun Heo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: switch to BUG_ON()

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:24:06PM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> Use BUG_ON() rather than an explicit if followed by BUG() for
> improved readability and also consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <[email protected]>

Applied to cgroup/for-4.12.

Thanks.

--
tejun

2017-04-05 05:52:57

by Zefan Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: switch to BUG_ON()

On 2017/3/27 0:24, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> Use BUG_ON() rather than an explicit if followed by BUG() for
> improved readability and also consistency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Found by coccinelle: bugon.cocci
> ./kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2125:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
> ./kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2127:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
> ./kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2143:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
>
> BUG_ON() wraps the explicit if condition and is actually in use for
> all conditional BUG() cases in cpuset.c except in this one function.
>
> Patch was compile-tested with: x86_64_defconfig (implies CONFIG_CPUSETS=y)
> (checkpatch warnings for this patch seem to be false-positives - the
> BUG_ON should be fine)
>
> Patch is against 4.11-rc3 (localversion-next is next-20170324)
>

Acked-by: Zefan Li <[email protected]>