2022-08-29 12:57:55

by Patrice CHOTARD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] spi: stm32-qspi: Fix pm_runtime management in stm32_qspi_transfer_one_message()

From: Patrice Chotard <[email protected]>

ctrl->auto_runtime_pm was wrongly set to true when adding
transfer_one_message() callback.
As explained in commit 6e6ccb3d4cdc ("spi: stm32-qspi: Add pm_runtime support")
the expected behavior is to prevent runtime suspends between each transfer.

Add needed pm_runtime API calls in stm32_qspi_transfer_one_message().

Fixes: a557fca630cc ("spi: stm32_qspi: Add transfer_one_message() spi callback")

Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <[email protected]>
---
drivers/spi/spi-stm32-qspi.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-stm32-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-stm32-qspi.c
index 679fd1c34f7e..227f450aa5f0 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-stm32-qspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-stm32-qspi.c
@@ -567,6 +567,10 @@ static int stm32_qspi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctrl,
if (!spi->cs_gpiod)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;

+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(qspi->dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
mutex_lock(&qspi->lock);

gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi->cs_gpiod, true);
@@ -629,6 +633,9 @@ static int stm32_qspi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctrl,
msg->status = ret;
spi_finalize_current_message(ctrl);

+ pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(qspi->dev);
+ pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(qspi->dev);
+
return ret;
}

@@ -847,7 +854,6 @@ static int stm32_qspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ctrl->mem_ops = &stm32_qspi_mem_ops;
ctrl->use_gpio_descriptors = true;
ctrl->transfer_one_message = stm32_qspi_transfer_one_message;
- ctrl->auto_runtime_pm = true;
ctrl->num_chipselect = STM32_QSPI_MAX_NORCHIP;
ctrl->dev.of_node = dev->of_node;

--
2.25.1


2022-08-29 13:17:17

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: stm32-qspi: Fix pm_runtime management in stm32_qspi_transfer_one_message()

On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 02:32:50PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Patrice Chotard <[email protected]>
>
> ctrl->auto_runtime_pm was wrongly set to true when adding
> transfer_one_message() callback.
> As explained in commit 6e6ccb3d4cdc ("spi: stm32-qspi: Add pm_runtime support")
> the expected behavior is to prevent runtime suspends between each transfer.

This doesn't apply against current code (the for-6.0 branch) -
please check and resend.


Attachments:
(No filename) (488.00 B)
signature.asc (499.00 B)
Download all attachments

2022-08-29 13:31:26

by Patrice CHOTARD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: stm32-qspi: Fix pm_runtime management in stm32_qspi_transfer_one_message()

Hi Mark

On 8/29/22 14:51, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 02:32:50PM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
>> From: Patrice Chotard <[email protected]>
>>
>> ctrl->auto_runtime_pm was wrongly set to true when adding
>> transfer_one_message() callback.
>> As explained in commit 6e6ccb3d4cdc ("spi: stm32-qspi: Add pm_runtime support")
>> the expected behavior is to prevent runtime suspends between each transfer.
>
> This doesn't apply against current code (the for-6.0 branch) -
> please check and resend.

This patch is not dedicated for the spi/for-6.0 branch but for the spi/for-6.1 one,
as this patch is fixing commit a557fca630cc which is merged in spi/for-6.1.

Thanks
Patrice

2022-08-29 16:53:43

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: stm32-qspi: Fix pm_runtime management in stm32_qspi_transfer_one_message()

On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 14:32:50 +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Patrice Chotard <[email protected]>
>
> ctrl->auto_runtime_pm was wrongly set to true when adding
> transfer_one_message() callback.
> As explained in commit 6e6ccb3d4cdc ("spi: stm32-qspi: Add pm_runtime support")
> the expected behavior is to prevent runtime suspends between each transfer.
>
> [...]

Applied to

broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: stm32-qspi: Fix pm_runtime management in stm32_qspi_transfer_one_message()
commit: 47c32b2b7fcfa97f7224df222f439fc0ccf94ffe

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark