In order to prepare the code for the modifiable EM perf_state table,
refactor existing function em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies().
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <[email protected]>
---
kernel/power/energy_model.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index f82111837b8d..265d51a948d4 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -240,10 +240,10 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
return 0;
}
-static void em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev)
+static void
+em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_state *table)
{
struct em_perf_domain *pd = dev->em_pd;
- struct em_perf_state *table;
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
int found = 0;
int i;
@@ -257,8 +257,6 @@ static void em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev)
return;
}
- table = pd->table;
-
for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) {
if (!(table[i].flags & EM_PERF_STATE_INEFFICIENT))
continue;
@@ -400,7 +398,7 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
dev->em_pd->flags |= flags;
- em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(dev);
+ em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(dev, dev->em_pd->table);
em_debug_create_pd(dev);
dev_info(dev, "EM: created perf domain\n");
--
2.17.1
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:34 AM Lukasz Luba <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In order to prepare the code for the modifiable EM perf_state table,
> refactor existing function em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <[email protected]>
Quite obviously, this series needs ACKs from the Energy Model people.
> ---
> kernel/power/energy_model.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> index f82111837b8d..265d51a948d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> @@ -240,10 +240,10 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev)
> +static void
> +em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_state *table)
> {
> struct em_perf_domain *pd = dev->em_pd;
> - struct em_perf_state *table;
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> int found = 0;
> int i;
> @@ -257,8 +257,6 @@ static void em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev)
> return;
> }
>
> - table = pd->table;
> -
> for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) {
> if (!(table[i].flags & EM_PERF_STATE_INEFFICIENT))
> continue;
> @@ -400,7 +398,7 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
>
> dev->em_pd->flags |= flags;
>
> - em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(dev);
> + em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(dev, dev->em_pd->table);
>
> em_debug_create_pd(dev);
> dev_info(dev, "EM: created perf domain\n");
> --
> 2.17.1
>
On 3/27/23 19:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:34 AM Lukasz Luba <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> In order to prepare the code for the modifiable EM perf_state table,
>> refactor existing function em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <[email protected]>
>
> Quite obviously, this series needs ACKs from the Energy Model people.
FWIW, I tried the patch-set and everything was working well. I had
some small comments for some patches,
Regards,
Pierre
Hi Rafael,
On 3/27/23 18:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:34 AM Lukasz Luba <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> In order to prepare the code for the modifiable EM perf_state table,
>> refactor existing function em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <[email protected]>
>
> Quite obviously, this series needs ACKs from the Energy Model people.
>
My apologies, I have missed your email. Sure thing, we are going to
discuss this patch set on OSPM23. So hopefully that would help bring
some attention here and people would look at it or give it a try.
Regards,
Lukasz
On 4/11/23 16:43, Pierre Gondois wrote:
>
>
> On 3/27/23 19:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:34 AM Lukasz Luba <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> In order to prepare the code for the modifiable EM perf_state table,
>>> refactor existing function em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <[email protected]>
>>
>> Quite obviously, this series needs ACKs from the Energy Model people.
>
> FWIW, I tried the patch-set and everything was working well. I had
> some small comments for some patches,
Thanks Pierre!
>
> Regards,
> Pierre