>> since if I remember correctly we need to define a event class
>> instead of duplicating a tracepoint with similar reporting.
>
> Very good point. I did overlook it. The original post did have disk
> name and didn't have cmd, now the two tracepoints look much more
> similar than the original post, so I agree the duplicate could be
> combined into an event class.
>
I sent out a V7 with a prep patch and testlog keeping your
original authorship from this patch.
If you find anything wrong with that please send out V8 on the
top of V7.
>>
>> -ck
>>
>>