Linus, something in git broke the prepackaged tarball/bzip2 generation?
$ tar -jxvf linux-2.6.19-rc2.tar.bz2
linux-2.6.19-rc2.gitignore
linux-2.6.19-rc2COPYING
linux-2.6.19-rc2CREDITS
linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/
linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/00-INDEX
linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/
linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/README
-rc1 was ok.
Anyone else notice this?
Thanks,
Shawn.
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:36:20 -0400, Shawn Starr <[email protected]> wrote:
>Linus, something in git broke the prepackaged tarball/bzip2 generation?
>
>$ tar -jxvf linux-2.6.19-rc2.tar.bz2
>linux-2.6.19-rc2.gitignore
>linux-2.6.19-rc2COPYING
>linux-2.6.19-rc2CREDITS
>linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/
>linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/00-INDEX
>linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/
>linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/README
>
>-rc1 was ok.
>
>Anyone else notice this?
I download and running the .bz2 patch against 2.6.18 okay, no try full
tarball.
Grant.
Shawn Starr schrieb:
> Linus, something in git broke the prepackaged tarball/bzip2 generation?
>
> $ tar -jxvf linux-2.6.19-rc2.tar.bz2
> linux-2.6.19-rc2.gitignore
> linux-2.6.19-rc2COPYING
> linux-2.6.19-rc2CREDITS
> linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/
> linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/00-INDEX
> linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/
> linux-2.6.19-rc2Documentation/ABI/README
>
> -rc1 was ok.
Perhaps tar generation has been switched to using git-archive instead of
git-tar-tree? There's an, admittedly, subtle difference in how the two
handle prefixes/basedirs. The following two commands do the same:
$ git-tar-tree rev basedir
$ git-archive --prefix=basedir/ rev
If you use --prefix and you want a base directory then you have to
provide your own slash (basedir = prefix + path_separator).
Ren?
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> Linus, something in git broke the prepackaged tarball/bzip2 generation?
Sorry, yes.
I switched over my "release-script" that generates the tar-balls and
patches to use the new syntax for "git tar-tree" (now "git archive"), and
I screwed up by not having the slash in the prefix.
The old git-tar-tree would add the slash to the prefix automatically,
git-archive does not. Which is arguably a bug in git-archive. Oh, well.
I'll re-generate the tar-file.
Linus