2024-03-05 20:25:16

by Daniel Golle

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] block: implement NVMEM provider

On embedded devices using an eMMC it is common that one or more partitions
on the eMMC are used to store MAC addresses and Wi-Fi calibration EEPROM
data. Allow referencing the partition in device tree for the kernel and
Wi-Fi drivers accessing it via the NVMEM layer.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <[email protected]>
---
block/Kconfig | 9 +++
block/Makefile | 1 +
block/blk-nvmem.c | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 185 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 block/blk-nvmem.c

diff --git a/block/Kconfig b/block/Kconfig
index 1de4682d48ccb..b1d4c88c70040 100644
--- a/block/Kconfig
+++ b/block/Kconfig
@@ -229,6 +229,15 @@ config BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION_FALLBACK
by falling back to the kernel crypto API when inline
encryption hardware is not present.

+config BLK_NVMEM
+ bool "Block device NVMEM provider"
+ depends on OF
+ depends on NVMEM
+ help
+ Allow block devices (or partitions) to act as NVMEM prodivers,
+ typically used with eMMC to store MAC addresses or Wi-Fi
+ calibration data on embedded devices.
+
source "block/partitions/Kconfig"

config BLK_MQ_PCI
diff --git a/block/Makefile b/block/Makefile
index 46ada9dc8bbfe..03c0bfa8642df 100644
--- a/block/Makefile
+++ b/block/Makefile
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED) += blk-zoned.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_WBT) += blk-wbt.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEBUG_FS) += blk-mq-debugfs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEBUG_FS_ZONED)+= blk-mq-debugfs-zoned.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_NVMEM) += blk-nvmem.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_SED_OPAL) += sed-opal.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_PM) += blk-pm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_INLINE_ENCRYPTION) += blk-crypto.o blk-crypto-profile.o \
diff --git a/block/blk-nvmem.c b/block/blk-nvmem.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..6deb2f251d813
--- /dev/null
+++ b/block/blk-nvmem.c
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * block device NVMEM provider
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Golle <[email protected]>
+ *
+ * Useful on devices using a partition on an eMMC for MAC addresses or
+ * Wi-Fi calibration EEPROM data.
+ */
+
+#include "blk.h"
+#include <linux/nvmem-provider.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/pagemap.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
+
+/* List of all NVMEM devices */
+static LIST_HEAD(nvmem_devices);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(devices_mutex);
+
+struct blk_nvmem {
+ struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct list_head list;
+};
+
+static int blk_nvmem_reg_read(void *priv, unsigned int from,
+ void *val, size_t bytes)
+{
+ blk_mode_t mode = BLK_OPEN_READ | BLK_OPEN_RESTRICT_WRITES;
+ unsigned long offs = from & ~PAGE_MASK, to_read;
+ pgoff_t f_index = from >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ struct blk_nvmem *bnv = priv;
+ size_t bytes_left = bytes;
+ struct file *bdev_file;
+ struct folio *folio;
+ void *p;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ bdev_file = bdev_file_open_by_dev(bnv->dev->devt, mode, priv, NULL);
+ if (!bdev_file)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (IS_ERR(bdev_file))
+ return PTR_ERR(bdev_file);
+
+ while (bytes_left) {
+ folio = read_mapping_folio(bdev_file->f_mapping, f_index++, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(folio);
+ goto err_release_bdev;
+ }
+ to_read = min_t(unsigned long, bytes_left, PAGE_SIZE - offs);
+ p = folio_address(folio) + offset_in_folio(folio, offs);
+ memcpy(val, p, to_read);
+ offs = 0;
+ bytes_left -= to_read;
+ val += to_read;
+ folio_put(folio);
+ }
+
+err_release_bdev:
+ fput(bdev_file);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int blk_nvmem_register(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(dev);
+ struct block_device *bdev = dev_to_bdev(dev);
+ struct nvmem_config config = {};
+ struct blk_nvmem *bnv;
+
+ /* skip devices which do not have a device tree node */
+ if (!np)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* skip devices without an nvmem layout defined */
+ if (!of_get_child_by_name(np, "nvmem-layout"))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * skip devices which don't have GENHD_FL_NVMEM set
+ *
+ * This flag is used for mtdblock and ubiblock devices because
+ * both, MTD and UBI already implement their own NVMEM provider.
+ * To avoid registering multiple NVMEM providers for the same
+ * device node, don't register the block NVMEM provider for them.
+ */
+ if (!(bdev->bd_disk->flags & GENHD_FL_NVMEM))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * skip block device too large to be represented as NVMEM devices
+ * which are using an 'int' as address
+ */
+ if (bdev_nr_bytes(bdev) > INT_MAX)
+ return -EFBIG;
+
+ bnv = kzalloc(sizeof(struct blk_nvmem), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!bnv)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ config.id = NVMEM_DEVID_NONE;
+ config.dev = &bdev->bd_device;
+ config.name = dev_name(&bdev->bd_device);
+ config.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ config.priv = bnv;
+ config.reg_read = blk_nvmem_reg_read;
+ config.size = bdev_nr_bytes(bdev);
+ config.word_size = 1;
+ config.stride = 1;
+ config.read_only = true;
+ config.root_only = true;
+ config.ignore_wp = true;
+ config.of_node = to_of_node(dev->fwnode);
+
+ bnv->dev = &bdev->bd_device;
+ bnv->nvmem = nvmem_register(&config);
+ if (IS_ERR(bnv->nvmem)) {
+ dev_err_probe(&bdev->bd_device, PTR_ERR(bnv->nvmem),
+ "Failed to register NVMEM device\n");
+
+ kfree(bnv);
+ return PTR_ERR(bnv->nvmem);
+ }
+
+ mutex_lock(&devices_mutex);
+ list_add_tail(&bnv->list, &nvmem_devices);
+ mutex_unlock(&devices_mutex);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void blk_nvmem_unregister(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct blk_nvmem *bnv_c, *bnv = NULL;
+
+ mutex_lock(&devices_mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry(bnv_c, &nvmem_devices, list) {
+ if (bnv_c->dev == dev) {
+ bnv = bnv_c;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!bnv) {
+ mutex_unlock(&devices_mutex);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ list_del(&bnv->list);
+ mutex_unlock(&devices_mutex);
+ nvmem_unregister(bnv->nvmem);
+ kfree(bnv);
+}
+
+static struct class_interface blk_nvmem_bus_interface __refdata = {
+ .class = &block_class,
+ .add_dev = &blk_nvmem_register,
+ .remove_dev = &blk_nvmem_unregister,
+};
+
+static int __init blk_nvmem_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = class_interface_register(&blk_nvmem_bus_interface);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+device_initcall(blk_nvmem_init);
--
2.44.0


2024-03-06 12:06:37

by Ricardo B. Marliere

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] block: implement NVMEM provider

Hi Daniel,

On 5 Mar 20:23, Daniel Golle wrote:
> static int __init blk_nvmem_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
> ret = class_interface_register(&blk_nvmem_bus_interface);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> return 0;

Just an idea, why not just:

return class_interface_register(&blk_nvmem_bus_interface);