This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.12.16 release.
There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.12.16-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.12.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.12.16-rc1
Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
mt76: mt7921: get rid of mcu_reset function pointer
Sean Wang <[email protected]>
mt76: mt7921: abort uncompleted scan by wifi reset
Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
mt76: mt7921: add wifi reset support
Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
mt76: dma: export mt76_dma_rx_cleanup routine
Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
mt76: dma: introduce mt76_dma_queue_reset routine
Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
mt76: mt7921: introduce __mt7921_start utility routine
Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
mt76: mt7921: introduce mt7921_run_firmware utility routine.
Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
mt76: mt7921: check mcu returned values in mt7921_start
Sid Manning <[email protected]>
Hexagon: change jumps to must-extend in futex_atomic_*
Sid Manning <[email protected]>
Hexagon: add target builtins to kernel
Sid Manning <[email protected]>
Hexagon: fix build errors
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-
arch/hexagon/Makefile | 6 +-
arch/hexagon/include/asm/futex.h | 4 +-
arch/hexagon/include/asm/timex.h | 3 +-
arch/hexagon/kernel/hexagon_ksyms.c | 8 +-
arch/hexagon/kernel/ptrace.c | 4 +-
arch/hexagon/lib/Makefile | 3 +-
arch/hexagon/lib/divsi3.S | 67 +++++++
arch/hexagon/lib/memcpy_likely_aligned.S | 56 ++++++
arch/hexagon/lib/modsi3.S | 46 +++++
arch/hexagon/lib/udivsi3.S | 38 ++++
arch/hexagon/lib/umodsi3.S | 36 ++++
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c | 47 +++--
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h | 8 +-
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c | 3 +-
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/mac.c | 209 +++++++++++++++------
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/main.c | 38 ++--
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/mcu.c | 36 ++--
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/mt7921.h | 6 +-
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/regs.h | 4 +
20 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
commit c001df978e4cb88975147ddd2c829c9e12a55076 upstream.
Export mt76_dma_rx_cleanup routine in mt76_queue_ops data structure.
This is a preliminary patch to introduce mt7921 chip reset support.
Co-developed-by: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <[email protected]>
Cc: Deren Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
@@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ static const struct mt76_queue_ops mt76_
.tx_queue_skb_raw = mt76_dma_tx_queue_skb_raw,
.tx_queue_skb = mt76_dma_tx_queue_skb,
.tx_cleanup = mt76_dma_tx_cleanup,
+ .rx_cleanup = mt76_dma_rx_cleanup,
.rx_reset = mt76_dma_rx_reset,
.kick = mt76_dma_kick_queue,
};
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h
@@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ struct mt76_queue_ops {
void (*tx_cleanup)(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_queue *q,
bool flush);
+ void (*rx_cleanup)(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_queue *q);
+
void (*kick)(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_queue *q);
void (*reset_q)(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_queue *q);
@@ -786,7 +788,8 @@ static inline u16 mt76_rev(struct mt76_d
#define mt76_tx_queue_skb_raw(dev, ...) (dev)->mt76.queue_ops->tx_queue_skb_raw(&((dev)->mt76), __VA_ARGS__)
#define mt76_tx_queue_skb(dev, ...) (dev)->mt76.queue_ops->tx_queue_skb(&((dev)->mt76), __VA_ARGS__)
#define mt76_queue_rx_reset(dev, ...) (dev)->mt76.queue_ops->rx_reset(&((dev)->mt76), __VA_ARGS__)
-#define mt76_queue_tx_cleanup(dev, ...) (dev)->mt76.queue_ops->tx_cleanup(&((dev)->mt76), __VA_ARGS__)
+#define mt76_queue_tx_cleanup(dev, ...) (dev)->mt76.queue_ops->tx_cleanup(&((dev)->mt76), __VA_ARGS__)
+#define mt76_queue_rx_cleanup(dev, ...) (dev)->mt76.queue_ops->rx_cleanup(&((dev)->mt76), __VA_ARGS__)
#define mt76_queue_kick(dev, ...) (dev)->mt76.queue_ops->kick(&((dev)->mt76), __VA_ARGS__)
#define mt76_queue_reset(dev, ...) (dev)->mt76.queue_ops->reset_q(&((dev)->mt76), __VA_ARGS__)
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:21:37 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.12.16 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.12.16-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
5.12.16-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen <[email protected]>
On 7/9/21 7:21 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.12.16 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.12.16-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 03:21:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.12.16 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.12.16-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <[email protected]>
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 at 18:52, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.12.16 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.12.16-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 5.12.16-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.12.y
* git commit: 45d72f8b4c4fd32aed859795c0ee6cb28d51af4f
* git describe: v5.12.15-12-g45d72f8b4c4f
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.12.y/build/v5.12.15-12-g45d72f8b4c4f
## No regressions (compared to v5.12.15)
## No fixes (compared to v5.12.15)
## Test result summary
total: 81182, pass: 66807, fail: 1819, skip: 11391, xfail: 1165,
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 193 total, 193 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native-
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none-
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 03:21:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.12.16 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 154 pass: 152 fail: 2
Failed builds:
riscv32:allmodconfig
riscv:allmodconfig
Qemu test results:
total: 462 pass: 462 fail: 0
Build failure:
cc1: error: '8944' is not a valid offset in '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:271: init/main.o] Error 1
The build failure is not new and seen since v5.12 (including mainline).
It happens if both STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK and GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT
are enabled at the same time (previously I had disabled
GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT in all of my my test builds). See
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/[email protected]/
for details.
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter
On 7/9/2021 6:21 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.12.16 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:14:09 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.12.16-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian