From: Arınç ÜNAL <[email protected]>
The core_rmw() function calls core_read_mmd_indirect() to read the
requested register, and then calls core_write_mmd_indirect() to write the
requested value to the register. Because Clause 22 is used to access Clause
45 registers, some operations on core_write_mmd_indirect() are
unnecessarily run. Get rid of core_read_mmd_indirect() and
core_write_mmd_indirect(), and run only the necessary operations on
core_write() and core_rmw().
Reviewed-by: Daniel Golle <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Daniel Golle <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
index 64b1f6320b9a..e0cb194019f8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
@@ -74,116 +74,94 @@ static const struct mt7530_mib_desc mt7530_mib[] = {
MIB_DESC(1, 0xb8, "RxArlDrop"),
};
-/* Since phy_device has not yet been created and
- * phy_{read,write}_mmd_indirect is not available, we provide our own
- * core_{read,write}_mmd_indirect with core_{clear,write,set} wrappers
- * to complete this function.
- */
-static int
-core_read_mmd_indirect(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int prtad, int devad)
+static void
+mt7530_mutex_lock(struct mt7530_priv *priv)
+{
+ if (priv->bus)
+ mutex_lock_nested(&priv->bus->mdio_lock, MDIO_MUTEX_NESTED);
+}
+
+static void
+mt7530_mutex_unlock(struct mt7530_priv *priv)
+{
+ if (priv->bus)
+ mutex_unlock(&priv->bus->mdio_lock);
+}
+
+static void
+core_write(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
{
struct mii_bus *bus = priv->bus;
- int value, ret;
+ int ret;
+
+ mt7530_mutex_lock(priv);
/* Write the desired MMD Devad */
ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
- MII_MMD_CTRL, devad);
+ MII_MMD_CTRL, MDIO_MMD_VEND2);
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
/* Write the desired MMD register address */
ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
- MII_MMD_DATA, prtad);
+ MII_MMD_DATA, reg);
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
/* Select the Function : DATA with no post increment */
ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
- MII_MMD_CTRL, devad | MII_MMD_CTRL_NOINCR);
+ MII_MMD_CTRL, MDIO_MMD_VEND2 | MII_MMD_CTRL_NOINCR);
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
- /* Read the content of the MMD's selected register */
- value = bus->read(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
- MII_MMD_DATA);
-
- return value;
+ /* Write the data into MMD's selected register */
+ ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
+ MII_MMD_DATA, val);
err:
- dev_err(&bus->dev, "failed to read mmd register\n");
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(&bus->dev, "failed to write mmd register\n");
- return ret;
+ mt7530_mutex_unlock(priv);
}
-static int
-core_write_mmd_indirect(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int prtad,
- int devad, u32 data)
+static void
+core_rmw(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 set)
{
struct mii_bus *bus = priv->bus;
+ u32 val;
int ret;
+ mt7530_mutex_lock(priv);
+
/* Write the desired MMD Devad */
ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
- MII_MMD_CTRL, devad);
+ MII_MMD_CTRL, MDIO_MMD_VEND2);
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
/* Write the desired MMD register address */
ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
- MII_MMD_DATA, prtad);
+ MII_MMD_DATA, reg);
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
/* Select the Function : DATA with no post increment */
ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
- MII_MMD_CTRL, devad | MII_MMD_CTRL_NOINCR);
+ MII_MMD_CTRL, MDIO_MMD_VEND2 | MII_MMD_CTRL_NOINCR);
if (ret < 0)
goto err;
+ /* Read the content of the MMD's selected register */
+ val = bus->read(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
+ MII_MMD_DATA);
+ val &= ~mask;
+ val |= set;
/* Write the data into MMD's selected register */
ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
- MII_MMD_DATA, data);
+ MII_MMD_DATA, val);
err:
if (ret < 0)
- dev_err(&bus->dev,
- "failed to write mmd register\n");
- return ret;
-}
-
-static void
-mt7530_mutex_lock(struct mt7530_priv *priv)
-{
- if (priv->bus)
- mutex_lock_nested(&priv->bus->mdio_lock, MDIO_MUTEX_NESTED);
-}
-
-static void
-mt7530_mutex_unlock(struct mt7530_priv *priv)
-{
- if (priv->bus)
- mutex_unlock(&priv->bus->mdio_lock);
-}
-
-static void
-core_write(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
-{
- mt7530_mutex_lock(priv);
-
- core_write_mmd_indirect(priv, reg, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, val);
-
- mt7530_mutex_unlock(priv);
-}
-
-static void
-core_rmw(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 set)
-{
- u32 val;
-
- mt7530_mutex_lock(priv);
-
- val = core_read_mmd_indirect(priv, reg, MDIO_MMD_VEND2);
- val &= ~mask;
- val |= set;
- core_write_mmd_indirect(priv, reg, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, val);
+ dev_err(&bus->dev, "failed to write mmd register\n");
mt7530_mutex_unlock(priv);
}
--
2.40.1
On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 08:35 +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> The core_rmw() function calls core_read_mmd_indirect() to read the
> requested register, and then calls core_write_mmd_indirect() to write the
> requested value to the register. Because Clause 22 is used to access Clause
> 45 registers, some operations on core_write_mmd_indirect() are
> unnecessarily run. Get rid of core_read_mmd_indirect() and
> core_write_mmd_indirect(), and run only the necessary operations on
> core_write() and core_rmw().
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Golle <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Daniel Golle <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> index 64b1f6320b9a..e0cb194019f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> @@ -74,116 +74,94 @@ static const struct mt7530_mib_desc mt7530_mib[] = {
> MIB_DESC(1, 0xb8, "RxArlDrop"),
> };
>
> -/* Since phy_device has not yet been created and
> - * phy_{read,write}_mmd_indirect is not available, we provide our own
> - * core_{read,write}_mmd_indirect with core_{clear,write,set} wrappers
> - * to complete this function.
> - */
> -static int
> -core_read_mmd_indirect(struct mt7530_priv *priv, int prtad, int devad)
> +static void
> +mt7530_mutex_lock(struct mt7530_priv *priv)
> +{
> + if (priv->bus)
> + mutex_lock_nested(&priv->bus->mdio_lock, MDIO_MUTEX_NESTED);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +mt7530_mutex_unlock(struct mt7530_priv *priv)
> +{
> + if (priv->bus)
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->bus->mdio_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +core_write(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u32 reg, u32 val)
> {
> struct mii_bus *bus = priv->bus;
> - int value, ret;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mt7530_mutex_lock(priv);
>
> /* Write the desired MMD Devad */
> ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
> - MII_MMD_CTRL, devad);
> + MII_MMD_CTRL, MDIO_MMD_VEND2);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err;
>
> /* Write the desired MMD register address */
> ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
> - MII_MMD_DATA, prtad);
> + MII_MMD_DATA, reg);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err;
>
> /* Select the Function : DATA with no post increment */
> ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
> - MII_MMD_CTRL, devad | MII_MMD_CTRL_NOINCR);
> + MII_MMD_CTRL, MDIO_MMD_VEND2 | MII_MMD_CTRL_NOINCR);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err;
What about a possible follow-up, moving the above writes in a separate
helper (say, 'core_select_register' or the like) and reusing it here
and in core_rmw() ?
Not blocking this series, I'm applying it.
Thanks,
Paolo
On 23/04/2024 11:40, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 08:35 +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>> /* Select the Function : DATA with no post increment */
>> ret = bus->write(bus, MT753X_CTRL_PHY_ADDR(priv->mdiodev->addr),
>> - MII_MMD_CTRL, devad | MII_MMD_CTRL_NOINCR);
>> + MII_MMD_CTRL, MDIO_MMD_VEND2 | MII_MMD_CTRL_NOINCR);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto err;
>
> What about a possible follow-up, moving the above writes in a separate
> helper (say, 'core_select_register' or the like) and reusing it here
> and in core_rmw() ?
There's a possibility where the Clause 45 access method could be used here
which would make this redundant. I will do your suggestion if that won't
work out.
>
> Not blocking this series, I'm applying it.
Cheers.
Arınç