EP-E68D5E24548545C9BBB607A98ADD61E6
Hi Paul,
>On Monday, March 30, 2015 11:09:00 AM Maninder Singh wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> we found One Kernel Crash issue in cipso_v4_sock_delattr :-
>> As Cipso supports only inet sockets so cipso_v4_sock_delattr will crash when
>> try to access any other socket type. cipso_v4_sock_delattr access
>> sk_inet->inet_opt which may contain not NULL but invalid address. we found
>> this issue with netlink socket.(reproducible by trinity using sendto system
>> call .)
>Hello,
>First, please go read the Documentation/SubmittingPatches from the kernel
>sources; your patch needs to be resubmitted and the instructions in that file
>will show you how to do it correctly next time.
>Second, this appears to only affect Smack based systems, yes? SELinux based
>systems should have the proper checking in place to prevent this (the checks
>are handled in the LSM). That said, it probably wouldn't hurt to add the
>extra checking to netlbl_sock_delattr(). If you properly resubmit your patch
>I'll ACK it.
>-Paul
>--
>paul moore
>http://www.paul-moore.com
As suggested resubmitting the patch .
Subject : socket family check in netlabel APIs
Adding check for socket family in netlbl_sock_delattr and netlbl_req_delattr as check present
in netlbl_sock_setattr and netlbl_req_setattr respectively.
as we faced crash in cipso_v4_sock_delattr due to other socket type.
Crash Logs :
[0-182.2400] [<c04c7fa4>] (cipso_v4_sock_delattr+0x0/0x74) from [<c0517b64>] (netlbl_sock_delattr+0x18/0x1c)
[0-182.2497] r4:00000000 r3:c07872f8
[0-182.2531] [<c0517b4c>] (netlbl_sock_delattr+0x0/0x1c) from [<c027b2fc>] (smack_netlabel+0x88/0x9c)
[0-182.2622] [<c027b274>] (smack_netlabel+0x0/0x9c) from [<c027b43c>] (smack_netlabel_send+0x12c/0x144)
[0-182.2714] r7 9ce9500 r6 7b67ef4 r5:c076f408 r4 8903dc0
[0-182.2770] [<c027b310>] (smack_netlabel_send+0x0/0x144) from [<c027b4a8>] (smack_socket_sendmsg+0x54/0x60)
[0-182.2866] [<c027b454>] (smack_socket_sendmsg+0x0/0x60) from [<c02789ec>] (security_socket_sendmsg+0x28/0x2c)
[0-182.2966] [<c02789c4>] (security_socket_sendmsg+0x0/0x2c) from [<c04343b0>] (sock_sendmsg+0x68/0xc0)
[0-182.3058] [<c0434348>] (sock_sendmsg+0x0/0xc0) from [<c04369e8>] (SyS_sendto+0xd8/0x110)
Signed-off-by: Vaneet Narang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by : Ajeet Yadav <[email protected]>
---
net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
index 28cddc8..606a5ce 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
@@ -824,7 +824,13 @@ socket_setattr_return:
*/
void netlbl_sock_delattr(struct sock *sk)
{
- cipso_v4_sock_delattr(sk);
+ switch (sk->sk_family) {
+ case AF_INET:
+ cipso_v4_sock_delattr(sk);
+ break;
+ default:
+ }
+ return;
}
/**
@@ -987,7 +993,13 @@ req_setattr_return:
*/
void netlbl_req_delattr(struct request_sock *req)
{
- cipso_v4_req_delattr(req);
+ switch (req->rsk_ops->family) {
+ case AF_INET:
+ cipso_v4_req_delattr(req);
+ break;
+ default:
+ }
+ return;
}
/**
--
1.7.1????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay? ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?