Den 13.10.2022 15.18, skrev Maxime Ripard:
> drm_connector_pick_cmdline_mode() is in charge of finding a proper
> drm_display_mode from the definition we got in the video= command line
> argument.
>
> Let's add some unit tests to make sure we're not getting any regressions
> there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Removed useless (for now) count and modes intermediate variables in
> get_modes
> - Switched to kunit assertions in test init, and to KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL
> instead of KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(..., NULL)
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Removed MODULE macros
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 4 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> index bbc535cc50dd..d553e793e673 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> @@ -1237,3 +1237,7 @@ int drm_client_modeset_dpms(struct drm_client_dev *client, int mode)
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_client_modeset_dpms);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_KUNIT_TEST
> +#include "tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c"
> +#endif
I can't say I like including the file like this, but exporting the
static function for testing isn't attractive either and doing it like
this is shown in the kunit docs, so:
Acked-by: Noralf Trønnes <[email protected]>