This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.15.23-rc1
Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi
Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
ksmbd: fix SMB 3.11 posix extension mount failure
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <[email protected]>
KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest
Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]>
arm64: Add Cortex-A510 CPU part definition
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 2 ++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++
crypto/algapi.c | 1 +
crypto/api.c | 1 -
drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +-
fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 2 +-
7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <[email protected]>
commit 2c212e1baedcd782b2535a3f86bc491977677c0e upstream.
Refuse SIDA memops on guests which are not protected.
For normal guests, the secure instruction data address designation,
which determines the location we access, is not under control of KVM.
Fixes: 19e122776886 (KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer)
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -4708,6 +4708,8 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_sida_op(struc
return -EINVAL;
if (mop->size + mop->sida_offset > sida_size(vcpu->arch.sie_block))
return -E2BIG;
+ if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
+ return -EINVAL;
switch (mop->op) {
case KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ:
From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
commit c6ce9c5831cae515d375a01b97ae1778689acf19 upstream.
The soft dependency on cryptomgr is only needed in algapi because
if algapi isn't present then no algorithms can be loaded. This
also fixes the case where api is built-in but algapi is built as
a module as the soft dependency would otherwise get lost.
Fixes: 8ab23d547f65 ("crypto: api - Add softdep on cryptomgr")
Reported-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
crypto/algapi.c | 1 +
crypto/api.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/crypto/algapi.c
+++ b/crypto/algapi.c
@@ -1277,3 +1277,4 @@ module_exit(crypto_algapi_exit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic algorithms API");
+MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr");
--- a/crypto/api.c
+++ b/crypto/api.c
@@ -603,4 +603,3 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(crypto_req_done);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cryptographic core API");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: cryptomgr");
From: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
commit 9ca8581e79e51c57e60b3b8e3b89d816448f49fe upstream.
cifs client set 4 to DataLength of create_posix context, which mean
Mode variable of create_posix context is only available. So buffer
validation of ksmbd should check only the size of Mode except for
the size of Reserved variable.
Fixes: 8f77150c15f8 ("ksmbd: add buffer validation for SMB2_CREATE_CONTEXT")
Cc: [email protected] # v5.15+
Reported-by: Steve French <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Steve French <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
@@ -2690,7 +2690,7 @@ int smb2_open(struct ksmbd_work *work)
(struct create_posix *)context;
if (le16_to_cpu(context->DataOffset) +
le32_to_cpu(context->DataLength) <
- sizeof(struct create_posix)) {
+ sizeof(struct create_posix) - 4) {
rc = -EINVAL;
goto err_out1;
}
On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:14:25 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
5.15.23-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen <[email protected]>
On 2/9/22 11:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <[email protected]>
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.23-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 722769939d600370e0f75656c6076add1736919a
* git describe: v5.15.21-118-g722769939d60
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.21-118-g722769939d60
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.21-112-g0472630a5621)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 87812, pass: 74191, fail: 495, skip: 10102, xfail: 824
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 259 total, 259 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 39 passed, 13 failed
* riscv: 24 total, 20 passed, 4 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 62 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 100 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/735
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/739
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/743
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
--
Regards
Sudip
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:25PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 488 pass: 488 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter
On 2/9/2022 11:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.23-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted 5.15.23-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Slade
On 10/02/22 02.14, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.23 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, gcc 10.2.0)
and powerpc (ps3_defconfig, gcc 11.2.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara