2022-10-04 09:22:17

by Juergen Gross

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] xen/pv: refactor msr access functions to support safe and unsafe accesses

Refactor and rename xen_read_msr_safe() and xen_write_msr_safe() to
support both cases of MSR accesses, safe ones and potentially GP-fault
generating ones.

This will prepare to no longer swallow GPs silently in xen_read_msr()
and xen_write_msr().

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
---
V2:
- init val in xen_do_read_msr() to 0 (Jan Beulich)
---
arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
index 9b1a58dda935..d5b0844a1b7c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
@@ -917,14 +917,18 @@ static void xen_write_cr4(unsigned long cr4)
native_write_cr4(cr4);
}

-static u64 xen_read_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, int *err)
+static u64 xen_do_read_msr(unsigned int msr, int *err)
{
- u64 val;
+ u64 val = 0; /* Avoid uninitialized value for safe variant. */

if (pmu_msr_read(msr, &val, err))
return val;

- val = native_read_msr_safe(msr, err);
+ if (err)
+ val = native_read_msr_safe(msr, err);
+ else
+ val = native_read_msr(msr);
+
switch (msr) {
case MSR_IA32_APICBASE:
val &= ~X2APIC_ENABLE;
@@ -933,23 +937,39 @@ static u64 xen_read_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, int *err)
return val;
}

-static int xen_write_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, unsigned low, unsigned high)
+static void set_seg(unsigned int which, unsigned int low, unsigned int high,
+ int *err)
{
- int ret;
- unsigned int which;
- u64 base;
+ u64 base = ((u64)high << 32) | low;
+
+ if (HYPERVISOR_set_segment_base(which, base) == 0)
+ return;

- ret = 0;
+ if (err)
+ *err = -EIO;
+ else
+ WARN(1, "Xen set_segment_base(%u, %llx) failed\n", which, base);
+}

+/*
+ * Support write_msr_safe() and write_msr() semantics.
+ * With err == NULL write_msr() semantics are selected.
+ * Supplying an err pointer requires err to be pre-initialized with 0.
+ */
+static void xen_do_write_msr(unsigned int msr, unsigned int low,
+ unsigned int high, int *err)
+{
switch (msr) {
- case MSR_FS_BASE: which = SEGBASE_FS; goto set;
- case MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE: which = SEGBASE_GS_USER; goto set;
- case MSR_GS_BASE: which = SEGBASE_GS_KERNEL; goto set;
-
- set:
- base = ((u64)high << 32) | low;
- if (HYPERVISOR_set_segment_base(which, base) != 0)
- ret = -EIO;
+ case MSR_FS_BASE:
+ set_seg(SEGBASE_FS, low, high, err);
+ break;
+
+ case MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE:
+ set_seg(SEGBASE_GS_USER, low, high, err);
+ break;
+
+ case MSR_GS_BASE:
+ set_seg(SEGBASE_GS_KERNEL, low, high, err);
break;

case MSR_STAR:
@@ -965,11 +985,28 @@ static int xen_write_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, unsigned low, unsigned high)
break;

default:
- if (!pmu_msr_write(msr, low, high, &ret))
- ret = native_write_msr_safe(msr, low, high);
+ if (!pmu_msr_write(msr, low, high, err)) {
+ if (err)
+ *err = native_write_msr_safe(msr, low, high);
+ else
+ native_write_msr(msr, low, high);
+ }
}
+}
+
+static u64 xen_read_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, int *err)
+{
+ return xen_do_read_msr(msr, err);
+}
+
+static int xen_write_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, unsigned int low,
+ unsigned int high)
+{
+ int err = 0;
+
+ xen_do_write_msr(msr, low, high, &err);

- return ret;
+ return err;
}

static u64 xen_read_msr(unsigned int msr)
--
2.35.3


2022-10-04 12:13:17

by Jan Beulich

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] xen/pv: refactor msr access functions to support safe and unsafe accesses

On 04.10.2022 10:43, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Refactor and rename xen_read_msr_safe() and xen_write_msr_safe() to
> support both cases of MSR accesses, safe ones and potentially GP-fault
> generating ones.
>
> This will prepare to no longer swallow GPs silently in xen_read_msr()
> and xen_write_msr().
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>

Albeit ...

> @@ -933,23 +937,39 @@ static u64 xen_read_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, int *err)
> return val;
> }
>
> -static int xen_write_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, unsigned low, unsigned high)
> +static void set_seg(unsigned int which, unsigned int low, unsigned int high,
> + int *err)
> {
> - int ret;
> - unsigned int which;
> - u64 base;
> + u64 base = ((u64)high << 32) | low;
> +
> + if (HYPERVISOR_set_segment_base(which, base) == 0)
> + return;
>
> - ret = 0;
> + if (err)
> + *err = -EIO;

... I don't see a good reason to override the error code handed to us
by the hypervisor here; I do realize though that this ...

> + else
> + WARN(1, "Xen set_segment_base(%u, %llx) failed\n", which, base);
> +}
>
> +/*
> + * Support write_msr_safe() and write_msr() semantics.
> + * With err == NULL write_msr() semantics are selected.
> + * Supplying an err pointer requires err to be pre-initialized with 0.
> + */
> +static void xen_do_write_msr(unsigned int msr, unsigned int low,
> + unsigned int high, int *err)
> +{
> switch (msr) {
> - case MSR_FS_BASE: which = SEGBASE_FS; goto set;
> - case MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE: which = SEGBASE_GS_USER; goto set;
> - case MSR_GS_BASE: which = SEGBASE_GS_KERNEL; goto set;
> -
> - set:
> - base = ((u64)high << 32) | low;
> - if (HYPERVISOR_set_segment_base(which, base) != 0)
> - ret = -EIO;

... was this way before.

Jan

2022-10-04 16:56:49

by Juergen Gross

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] xen/pv: refactor msr access functions to support safe and unsafe accesses

On 04.10.22 13:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 04.10.2022 10:43, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Refactor and rename xen_read_msr_safe() and xen_write_msr_safe() to
>> support both cases of MSR accesses, safe ones and potentially GP-fault
>> generating ones.
>>
>> This will prepare to no longer swallow GPs silently in xen_read_msr()
>> and xen_write_msr().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
>
> Albeit ...
>
>> @@ -933,23 +937,39 @@ static u64 xen_read_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, int *err)
>> return val;
>> }
>>
>> -static int xen_write_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, unsigned low, unsigned high)
>> +static void set_seg(unsigned int which, unsigned int low, unsigned int high,
>> + int *err)
>> {
>> - int ret;
>> - unsigned int which;
>> - u64 base;
>> + u64 base = ((u64)high << 32) | low;
>> +
>> + if (HYPERVISOR_set_segment_base(which, base) == 0)
>> + return;
>>
>> - ret = 0;
>> + if (err)
>> + *err = -EIO;
>
> ... I don't see a good reason to override the error code handed to us
> by the hypervisor here; I do realize though that this ...
>
>> + else
>> + WARN(1, "Xen set_segment_base(%u, %llx) failed\n", which, base);
>> +}
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Support write_msr_safe() and write_msr() semantics.
>> + * With err == NULL write_msr() semantics are selected.
>> + * Supplying an err pointer requires err to be pre-initialized with 0.
>> + */
>> +static void xen_do_write_msr(unsigned int msr, unsigned int low,
>> + unsigned int high, int *err)
>> +{
>> switch (msr) {
>> - case MSR_FS_BASE: which = SEGBASE_FS; goto set;
>> - case MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE: which = SEGBASE_GS_USER; goto set;
>> - case MSR_GS_BASE: which = SEGBASE_GS_KERNEL; goto set;
>> -
>> - set:
>> - base = ((u64)high << 32) | low;
>> - if (HYPERVISOR_set_segment_base(which, base) != 0)
>> - ret = -EIO;
>
> ... was this way before.

And on bare metal write_msr_safe() will return -EIO, too.


Juergen


Attachments:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc (3.08 kB)
OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature (505.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature
Download all attachments