Hello all,
sorry for spamming, this one have the correct email addresses.
This patch adds a property for to control reset behavior on
PMIC_RST_B assertion.
---
v1 ---> v2:
- Fix email addresses
Fabio Aiuto (1):
regulator: pca9450: make warm reset on PMIC_RST_B assertion
.../bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml | 6 ++++++
drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c | 11 ++++++++---
include/linux/regulator/pca9450.h | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:01:37PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> sorry for spamming, this one have the correct email addresses.
> This patch adds a property for to control reset behavior on
> PMIC_RST_B assertion.
Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything
that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the ---
if it's administrative stuff. This reduces mail volume and ensures that
any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being
lost.
Dear Mark,
Il Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:37:48PM +0100, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:01:37PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > sorry for spamming, this one have the correct email addresses.
> > This patch adds a property for to control reset behavior on
> > PMIC_RST_B assertion.
>
> Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything
> that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the ---
> if it's administrative stuff. This reduces mail volume and ensures that
> any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being
> lost.
I've got it, thanks. Do you want me to send a v3 or are you taking in
consideration this one?
kr
fabio
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:22:22PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> I've got it, thanks. Do you want me to send a v3 or are you taking in
> consideration this one?
No, it's fine this time - just a note for next time.