2022-09-28 22:30:54

by Colin Ian King

Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"

There a couple of spelling mistakes, one in a literal string and one
in a comment. Fix them.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
index 3fb4f69b1962..e1a937277b54 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
- "calls: not on unpriviledged",
+ "calls: not on unprivileged",
.insns = {
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 2),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
index 187c6f6e32bc..d37f512fad16 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1 },
- /* The unpriviledged case is not too interesting; variable
+ /* The unprivileged case is not too interesting; variable
* stack access is rejected.
*/
.errstr_unpriv = "R2 variable stack access prohibited for !root",
--
2.37.1

2022-09-30 02:23:41

by John Fastabend

Subject: RE: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"

Colin Ian King wrote:
> There a couple of spelling mistakes, one in a literal string and one
> in a comment. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> index 3fb4f69b1962..e1a937277b54 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@
> .result = ACCEPT,
> },
> {
> - "calls: not on unpriviledged",
> + "calls: not on unprivileged",
> .insns = {
> BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 2),
> BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
> index 187c6f6e32bc..d37f512fad16 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
> BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> },
> .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1 },
> - /* The unpriviledged case is not too interesting; variable
> + /* The unprivileged case is not too interesting; variable
> * stack access is rejected.
> */
> .errstr_unpriv = "R2 variable stack access prohibited for !root",
> --
> 2.37.1
>

Sure, but bpf-next.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>

2022-09-30 22:30:28

by patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 23:15:55 +0100 you wrote:
> There a couple of spelling mistakes, one in a literal string and one
> in a comment. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Here is the summary with links:
- selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2efcf695bfc0

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html