From: Dumitru Ceclan <[email protected]>
The AD7173 family offer a complete integrated Sigma-Delta ADC solution
which can be used in high precision, low noise single channel applications
or higher speed multiplexed applications. The Sigma-Delta ADC is intended
primarily for measurement of signals close to DC but also delivers
outstanding performance with input bandwidths out to ~10kHz.
Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceclan <[email protected]>
---
V4 -> V5
- Use string enum instead of integers for "adi,reference-select"
- Fix conditional checking in regards to compatible
.../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml | 169 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 169 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..32a59a2f2e91
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+# Copyright 2023 Analog Devices Inc.
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Analog Devices AD7173 ADC
+
+maintainers:
+ - Ceclan Dumitru <[email protected]>
+
+description: |
+ Bindings for the Analog Devices AD717X ADC's. Datasheets for supported chips:
+ https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD7172-2.pdf
+ https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD7173-8.pdf
+ https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD7175-2.pdf
+ https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD7176-2.pdf
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ enum:
+ - adi,ad7172-2
+ - adi,ad7173-8
+ - adi,ad7175-2
+ - adi,ad7176-2
+
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ interrupts:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ '#address-cells':
+ const: 1
+
+ '#size-cells':
+ const: 0
+
+ spi-max-frequency:
+ maximum: 20000000
+
+ refin-supply:
+ description: external reference supply, can be used as reference for conversion.
+
+ refin2-supply:
+ description: external reference supply, can be used as reference for conversion.
+
+ avdd-supply:
+ description: avdd supply, can be used as reference for conversion.
+
+ required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - interrupts
+
+patternProperties:
+ "^channel@[0-9a-f]$":
+ type: object
+ $ref: adc.yaml
+ unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ minimum: 0
+ maximum: 15
+
+ diff-channels:
+ items:
+ minimum: 0
+ maximum: 31
+
+ adi,reference-select:
+ description: |
+ Select the reference source to use when converting on
+ the specific channel. Valid values are:
+ refin : REFIN(+)/REFIN(−).
+ refin2 : REFIN2(+)/REFIN2(−)
+ refout-avss: REFOUT/AVSS (Internal reference)
+ avdd : AVDD
+
+ External reference refin2 only available on ad7173-8.
+ If not specified, internal reference used.
+ enum:
+ - refin
+ - refin2
+ - refout-avss
+ - avdd
+ default: refout-avss
+
+ bipolar:
+ type: boolean
+
+ required:
+ - reg
+ - diff-channels
+
+allOf:
+ - $ref: /schemas/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml#
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ not:
+ contains:
+ const: adi,ad7173-8
+ then:
+ properties:
+ refin2-supply: false
+ patternProperties:
+ "^channel@[0-9a-f]$":
+ properties:
+ adi,reference-select:
+ enum:
+ - refin
+ - refout-avss
+ - avdd
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+
+ spi {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ adc@0 {
+ compatible = "adi,ad7173-8";
+ reg = <0>;
+
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ interrupts = <25 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
+ spi-max-frequency = <5000000>;
+
+ channel@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ bipolar;
+ diff-channels = <0 1>;
+ };
+
+ channel@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+ diff-channels = <2 3>;
+ };
+
+ channel@2 {
+ reg = <2>;
+ bipolar;
+ diff-channels = <4 5>;
+ };
+
+ channel@3 {
+ reg = <3>;
+ bipolar;
+ diff-channels = <6 7>;
+ };
+
+ channel@4 {
+ reg = <4>;
+ diff-channels = <8 9>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
--
2.42.0
On 23/11/2023 15:02, mitrutzceclan wrote:
> From: Dumitru Ceclan <[email protected]>
>
> The AD7173 family offer a complete integrated Sigma-Delta ADC solution
> which can be used in high precision, low noise single channel applications
> or higher speed multiplexed applications. The Sigma-Delta ADC is intended
> primarily for measurement of signals close to DC but also delivers
> outstanding performance with input bandwidths out to ~10kHz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceclan <[email protected]>
> ---
> V4 -> V5
> - Use string enum instead of integers for "adi,reference-select"
> - Fix conditional checking in regards to compatible
>
> .../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml | 169 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 169 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..32a59a2f2e91
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +# Copyright 2023 Analog Devices Inc.
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Analog Devices AD7173 ADC
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Ceclan Dumitru <[email protected]>
> +
> +description: |
> + Bindings for the Analog Devices AD717X ADC's. Datasheets for supported chips:
Drop "Bindings for" and instead describe hardware.
> + https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD7172-2.pdf
> + https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD7173-8.pdf
> + https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD7175-2.pdf
> + https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD7176-2.pdf
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - adi,ad7172-2
> + - adi,ad7173-8
> + - adi,ad7175-2
> + - adi,ad7176-2
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + '#address-cells':
> + const: 1
> +
> + '#size-cells':
> + const: 0
> +
> + spi-max-frequency:
> + maximum: 20000000
> +
> + refin-supply:
> + description: external reference supply, can be used as reference for conversion.
> +
> + refin2-supply:
> + description: external reference supply, can be used as reference for conversion.
> +
> + avdd-supply:
> + description: avdd supply, can be used as reference for conversion.
> +
> + required:
Please test your code before sending. You ignored my comment. This has
both wrong indentation and wrong placement - should be after all
properties and patternProperties.
Do not ignore comments but respond to them.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 11/23/23 16:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/11/2023 15:02, mitrutzceclan wrote:
>> + Bindings for the Analog Devices AD717X ADC's. Datasheets for supported chips:
>
> Drop "Bindings for" and instead describe hardware.
>
Okay
...
>> + avdd-supply:
>> + description: avdd supply, can be used as reference for conversion.
>> +
>> + required:
>
> Please test your code before sending. You ignored my comment. This has
> both wrong indentation and wrong placement - should be after all
> properties and patternProperties.
>
> Do not ignore comments but respond to them.
>
There were no errors while testing the yaml binding (with
DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check - to make sure that this is how
bindings should be tested). Indeed I did not test the yaml if the
required properties are missing from the example. What is indicative in
this patch that it was not tested?
I did not ignore your comment. I did not have questions about it. I
missed the indentation. Sorry about that.
But about the placement of 'required': the example-schema does not have
the exact case of pattern properties. Also, there are multiple iio/adc
(ad4130, ad7124, ad7292) bindings that place required before
patternProperties. I assumed that this placement is correct.
Will move it in next version.
In regards to responding to comments: if there are no questions about a
comment and will fix in next version, should there be a response anyway
just confirming it?
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:02:55 +0200, mitrutzceclan wrote:
> From: Dumitru Ceclan <[email protected]>
>
> The AD7173 family offer a complete integrated Sigma-Delta ADC solution
> which can be used in high precision, low noise single channel applications
> or higher speed multiplexed applications. The Sigma-Delta ADC is intended
> primarily for measurement of signals close to DC but also delivers
> outstanding performance with input bandwidths out to ~10kHz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceclan <[email protected]>
> ---
> V4 -> V5
> - Use string enum instead of integers for "adi,reference-select"
> - Fix conditional checking in regards to compatible
>
> .../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml | 169 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 169 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml
>
My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
yamllint warnings/errors:
dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml: properties:required: ['compatible', 'reg', 'interrupts'] is not of type 'object', 'boolean'
from schema $id: http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml: properties: 'required' should not be valid under {'$ref': '#/definitions/json-schema-prop-names'}
hint: A json-schema keyword was found instead of a DT property name.
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/keywords.yaml#
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad7173.yaml: properties:required: ['compatible', 'reg', 'interrupts'] is not of type 'object', 'boolean'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/keywords.yaml#
doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20231123140320.30409-1-user@HYB-hhAwRlzzMZb
The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
should be noted in *this* patch.
If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:
pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
On 23/11/2023 16:11, Ceclan Dumitru wrote:
>
>
> On 11/23/23 16:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/11/2023 15:02, mitrutzceclan wrote:
>>> + Bindings for the Analog Devices AD717X ADC's. Datasheets for supported chips:
>>
>> Drop "Bindings for" and instead describe hardware.
>>
>
> Okay
>
> ...
>
>>> + avdd-supply:
>>> + description: avdd supply, can be used as reference for conversion.
>>> +
>>> + required:
>>
>> Please test your code before sending. You ignored my comment. This has
>> both wrong indentation and wrong placement - should be after all
>> properties and patternProperties.
>>
>> Do not ignore comments but respond to them.
>>
>
> There were no errors while testing the yaml binding (with
> DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check - to make sure that this is how
> bindings should be tested). Indeed I did not test the yaml if the
> required properties are missing from the example. What is indicative in
> this patch that it was not tested?
Then your testing method might miss something, because as you can see -
Rob's bot found the issue.
>
> I did not ignore your comment. I did not have questions about it. I
> missed the indentation. Sorry about that.
>
> But about the placement of 'required': the example-schema does not have
> the exact case of pattern properties. Also, there are multiple iio/adc
> (ad4130, ad7124, ad7292) bindings that place required before
> patternProperties. I assumed that this placement is correct.
>
> Will move it in next version.
>
> In regards to responding to comments: if there are no questions about a
> comment and will fix in next version, should there be a response anyway
> just confirming it?
The point is that code did not change here and there was no
Ack/Done/something reply.
Best regards,
Krzysztof