When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several
examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup.
This series cleans up the hisilicon hikey970 PMIC dtsi which appears to
have been used as the basis for some of the examples.
Note that the binding documents "hisilicon,hi6421v600-spmi" while the
devicetree and driver only uses and recognises "hisilicon,hi6421-spmi".
I'll leave that as is for now...
Johan
Johan Hovold (2):
arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: fix regulator cells properties
arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: clean up SPMI node
arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hikey970-pmic.dtsi | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.41.0
Hi Johan,
On 2023/12/1 1:56, Johan Hovold wrote:
> When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several
> examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup.
>
> This series cleans up the hisilicon hikey970 PMIC dtsi which appears to
> have been used as the basis for some of the examples.
>
> Note that the binding documents "hisilicon,hi6421v600-spmi" while the
> devicetree and driver only uses and recognises "hisilicon,hi6421-spmi".
> I'll leave that as is for now...
>
> Johan
>
>
> Johan Hovold (2):
> arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: fix regulator cells properties
> arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: clean up SPMI node
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hikey970-pmic.dtsi | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Series applied to the HiSilicon arm64 dt tree as the binding part has been applied.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Wei