2024-02-22 23:08:44

by Unnathi Chalicheemala

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Add llcc Broadcast_AND register

The LLCC block in SM8450, SM8550 and SM8650 have a new register
space for Broadcast_AND region. This is used to check that all
channels have bit set to "1", mainly in SCID activation/deactivation.

Previously we were mapping only the Broadcast_OR region assuming
there was only one broadcast register region. Now we also map
Broadcast_AND region.

Signed-off-by: Unnathi Chalicheemala <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml | 27 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
index 07ccbda4a0ab..a6237028957f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
@@ -141,8 +141,31 @@ allOf:
- qcom,sm8150-llcc
- qcom,sm8250-llcc
- qcom,sm8350-llcc
+ then:
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ items:
+ - description: LLCC0 base register region
+ - description: LLCC1 base register region
+ - description: LLCC2 base register region
+ - description: LLCC3 base register region
+ - description: LLCC broadcast base register region
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: llcc0_base
+ - const: llcc1_base
+ - const: llcc2_base
+ - const: llcc3_base
+ - const: llcc_broadcast_base
+
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
- qcom,sm8450-llcc
- qcom,sm8550-llcc
+ - qcom,sm8650-llcc
then:
properties:
reg:
@@ -151,7 +174,8 @@ allOf:
- description: LLCC1 base register region
- description: LLCC2 base register region
- description: LLCC3 base register region
- - description: LLCC broadcast base register region
+ - description: LLCC broadcast OR register region
+ - description: LLCC broadcast AND register region
reg-names:
items:
- const: llcc0_base
@@ -159,6 +183,7 @@ allOf:
- const: llcc2_base
- const: llcc3_base
- const: llcc_broadcast_base
+ - const: llcc_broadcast_and_base

additionalProperties: false

--
2.25.1



2024-02-27 16:29:45

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Add llcc Broadcast_AND register

On 23/02/2024 00:07, Unnathi Chalicheemala wrote:
> The LLCC block in SM8450, SM8550 and SM8650 have a new register
> space for Broadcast_AND region. This is used to check that all
> channels have bit set to "1", mainly in SCID activation/deactivation.
>
> Previously we were mapping only the Broadcast_OR region assuming
> there was only one broadcast register region. Now we also map
> Broadcast_AND region.
>
> Signed-off-by: Unnathi Chalicheemala <[email protected]>

Why did you ignore the tags? Qualcomm upstreaming guide covers this
case, so please read it before sending patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


2024-02-28 01:04:58

by Unnathi Chalicheemala

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Add llcc Broadcast_AND register

On 2/27/2024 7:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/02/2024 00:07, Unnathi Chalicheemala wrote:
>> The LLCC block in SM8450, SM8550 and SM8650 have a new register
>> space for Broadcast_AND region. This is used to check that all
>> channels have bit set to "1", mainly in SCID activation/deactivation.
>>
>> Previously we were mapping only the Broadcast_OR region assuming
>> there was only one broadcast register region. Now we also map
>> Broadcast_AND region.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Unnathi Chalicheemala <[email protected]>
>
> Why did you ignore the tags? Qualcomm upstreaming guide covers this
> case, so please read it before sending patches.
>

I was asked to remove the Reviewed-by tag as the previous version of the
patch gave errors on running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check',
that's why I dropped it.
It was sometime ago, https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

2024-02-28 07:14:25

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Add llcc Broadcast_AND register

On 28/02/2024 02:04, Unnathi Chalicheemala wrote:
> On 2/27/2024 7:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 23/02/2024 00:07, Unnathi Chalicheemala wrote:
>>> The LLCC block in SM8450, SM8550 and SM8650 have a new register
>>> space for Broadcast_AND region. This is used to check that all
>>> channels have bit set to "1", mainly in SCID activation/deactivation.
>>>
>>> Previously we were mapping only the Broadcast_OR region assuming
>>> there was only one broadcast register region. Now we also map
>>> Broadcast_AND region.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Unnathi Chalicheemala <[email protected]>
>>
>> Why did you ignore the tags? Qualcomm upstreaming guide covers this
>> case, so please read it before sending patches.
>>
>
> I was asked to remove the Reviewed-by tag as the previous version of the
> patch gave errors on running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check',
> that's why I dropped it.
> It was sometime ago, https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

And where is it explained/mentioned? Every tag drop should be documented.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


2024-02-28 17:55:18

by Unnathi Chalicheemala

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Add llcc Broadcast_AND register

On 2/27/2024 11:14 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/02/2024 02:04, Unnathi Chalicheemala wrote:
>> On 2/27/2024 7:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 23/02/2024 00:07, Unnathi Chalicheemala wrote:
>>>> The LLCC block in SM8450, SM8550 and SM8650 have a new register
>>>> space for Broadcast_AND region. This is used to check that all
>>>> channels have bit set to "1", mainly in SCID activation/deactivation.
>>>>
>>>> Previously we were mapping only the Broadcast_OR region assuming
>>>> there was only one broadcast register region. Now we also map
>>>> Broadcast_AND region.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Unnathi Chalicheemala <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Why did you ignore the tags? Qualcomm upstreaming guide covers this
>>> case, so please read it before sending patches.
>>>
>>
>> I was asked to remove the Reviewed-by tag as the previous version of the
>> patch gave errors on running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check',
>> that's why I dropped it.
>> It was sometime ago, https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>
> And where is it explained/mentioned? Every tag drop should be documented.
>

I understand, thanks for pointing out. I will record such tag drops in the change log.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>