On 01/12/2022 9:09 pm, Bitterblue Smith wrote:
> On 01/12/2022 04:18, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jun ASAKA <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 9:39 AM
>>> To: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
>>> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: fixing IQK failures for rtl8192eu
>>>
>>> On 01/12/2022 8:54 am, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: JunASAKA <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 10:09 PM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; JunASAKA
>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] wifi: rtl8xxxu: fixing IQK failures for rtl8192eu
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixing "Path A RX IQK failed" and "Path B RX IQK failed"
>>>>> issues for rtl8192eu chips by replacing the arguments with
>>>>> the ones in the updated official driver.
>>>> I think it would be better if you can point out which version you use, and
>>>> people will not modify them back to old version suddenly.
>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: JunASAKA <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> .../realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c | 76 +++++++++++++------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
>>>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
>>>>> index b06508d0cd..82346500f2 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -891,22 +907,28 @@ static int rtl8192eu_iqk_path_b(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)
>>>>>
>>>>> rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x00000000);
>>>>> rtl8xxxu_write_rfreg(priv, RF_B, RF6052_REG_UNKNOWN_DF, 0x00180);
>>>>> - rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x80800000);
>>>>>
>>>>> - rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x00000000);
>>>>> + rtl8xxxu_write_rfreg(priv, RF_B, RF6052_REG_WE_LUT, 0x800a0);
>>>>> + rtl8xxxu_write_rfreg(priv, RF_B, RF6052_REG_RCK_OS, 0x20000);
>>>>> + rtl8xxxu_write_rfreg(priv, RF_B, RF6052_REG_TXPA_G1, 0x0000f);
>>>>> + rtl8xxxu_write_rfreg(priv, RF_B, RF6052_REG_TXPA_G2, 0x07f77);
>>>>> +
>>>>> rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x80800000);
>>>>>
>>>>> + // rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x00000000);
>>>>> + // rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_FPGA0_IQK, 0x80800000);
>>>>> +
>>>> I think this is a test code of vendor driver. No need them here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> /* Path B IQK setting */
>>>>> rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_TX_IQK_TONE_A, 0x38008c1c);
>>>>> rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_RX_IQK_TONE_A, 0x38008c1c);
>>>>> rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_TX_IQK_TONE_B, 0x18008c1c);
>>>>> rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_RX_IQK_TONE_B, 0x38008c1c);
>>>>>
>>>>> - rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_TX_IQK_PI_B, 0x821403e2);
>>>>> + rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_TX_IQK_PI_B, 0x82140303);
>>>>> rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_RX_IQK_PI_B, 0x68160000);
>>>>>
>>>>> /* LO calibration setting */
>>>>> - rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_IQK_AGC_RSP, 0x00492911);
>>>>> + rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_IQK_AGC_RSP, 0x00462911);
>>>>>
>>>>> /* One shot, path A LOK & IQK */
>>>>> rtl8xxxu_write32(priv, REG_IQK_AGC_PTS, 0xfa000000);
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> I have compared your patch with internal code, and they are the same.
>>>> But, I don't have a test.
>>>>
>>>> Ping-Ke
>>> I changed those arguments into the ones here:
>>> https://github.com/Mange/rtl8192eu-linux-driver which works fine with my
>>> rtl8192eu wifi dongle. But forgive my ignorant that I don't have enough
>>> experience on wifi drivers, I just compared those two drivers and
>>> figured that those codes fixing my IQK failures.
>> I do similar things as well. :-)
>>
>> The github repository mentioned
>> "This branch is based on Realtek's driver versioned 4.4.1. master is based on 4.3.1.1 originally."
>> So, we can add something to commit message:
>> 1. https://github.com/Mange/rtl8192eu-linux-driver
>> 2. vendor driver version: 4.3.1.1
>>
>> --
>> Ping-Ke
>>
> That repo is confusing, unfortunately. Indeed, the "master" branch seems to
> contain v4.3.1.1_11320.20140505. But the last commit is from 2017.
>
> The "realtek-4.4.x" branch is the one being actively maintained, and at some
> point it was updated to v5.6.4_35685.20191108_COEX20171113-0047. README.md
> was forgotten.
Well, it is and I am using the branch "realtek-4.4.x" for this patch
that my problems has fixed correctly. But I has issued a v2 patch added
"vendor driver version: 4.3.1.1" which may be incorrect as you
mentioned. Is that means I need issue a v3 patch to change the commit
messages to "version 5.6.4"? I can do it right now.
Jun ASAKA.