Build kernel with `C=2`:
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c:24:18: warning: symbol
'isa207_pmu_format_attr' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c:101:5: warning: symbol 'p9_dd21_bl_ev'
was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c:115:5: warning: symbol 'p9_dd22_bl_ev'
was not declared. Should it be static?
Those symbols are used only in the files that define them so we declare
them as static to fix the warnings.
Signed-off-by: Wang Wensheng <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 964437adec18..85dc860b265b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_stop, "config:32-35");
PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_start, "config:36-39");
PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_cmp, "config:40-49");
-struct attribute *isa207_pmu_format_attr[] = {
+static struct attribute *isa207_pmu_format_attr[] = {
&format_attr_event.attr,
&format_attr_pmcxsel.attr,
&format_attr_mark.attr,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
index 2a57e93a79dc..4a315fad1f99 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
/* PowerISA v2.07 format attribute structure*/
extern struct attribute_group isa207_pmu_format_group;
-int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
+static int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
PM_MRK_ST_DONE_L2,
PM_RADIX_PWC_L1_HIT,
PM_FLOP_CMPL,
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
PM_DISP_HELD_SYNC_HOLD,
};
-int p9_dd22_bl_ev[] = {
+static int p9_dd22_bl_ev[] = {
PM_DTLB_MISS_16G,
PM_DERAT_MISS_2M,
PM_DTLB_MISS_2M,
--
2.25.0
> On 23-Sep-2020, at 12:44 PM, Wang Wensheng <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Build kernel with `C=2`:
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c:24:18: warning: symbol
> 'isa207_pmu_format_attr' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c:101:5: warning: symbol 'p9_dd21_bl_ev'
> was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c:115:5: warning: symbol 'p9_dd22_bl_ev'
> was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Those symbols are used only in the files that define them so we declare
> them as static to fix the warnings.
Hi,
Looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Athira Rajeev <[email protected]>
Thanks
Athira
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Wensheng <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> index 964437adec18..85dc860b265b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_stop, "config:32-35");
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_start, "config:36-39");
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_cmp, "config:40-49");
>
> -struct attribute *isa207_pmu_format_attr[] = {
> +static struct attribute *isa207_pmu_format_attr[] = {
> &format_attr_event.attr,
> &format_attr_pmcxsel.attr,
> &format_attr_mark.attr,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> index 2a57e93a79dc..4a315fad1f99 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> /* PowerISA v2.07 format attribute structure*/
> extern struct attribute_group isa207_pmu_format_group;
>
> -int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
> +static int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
> PM_MRK_ST_DONE_L2,
> PM_RADIX_PWC_L1_HIT,
> PM_FLOP_CMPL,
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
> PM_DISP_HELD_SYNC_HOLD,
> };
>
> -int p9_dd22_bl_ev[] = {
> +static int p9_dd22_bl_ev[] = {
> PM_DTLB_MISS_16G,
> PM_DERAT_MISS_2M,
> PM_DTLB_MISS_2M,
> --
> 2.25.0
>