I'm testing the robustness of Xorg 1.3 server with intel 2.0 driver
by restarting the X and a set of apps every 30 seconds. After
about an hour this happened.
2.6.21-1.3116.ONELAN is the same as 2.6.21-1.3116 from FC7
but with the spec file change so that we can run the kernel on an FC4
system.
eth0: no IPv6 routers present
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6b6b
printing eip:
6b6b6b6b
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
SMP
last sysfs file: /class/vc/vcsa7/dev
Modules linked in: ipv6(U) autofs4(U) usbvision(U) videodev(U)
v4l2_common(U) v4l1_compat(U) i2c_core(U) video(U) dock(U) button(U)
battery(U) ac(U) uhci_hcd(U) ehci_hcd(U) iTCO_wdt(U)
iTCO_vendor_support(U) snd_hda_intel(U) snd_hda_codec(U)
snd_seq_dummy(U) snd_seq_oss(U) snd_seq_midi_event(U) snd_seq(U)
snd_seq_device(U) snd_pcm_oss(U) snd_mixer_oss(U) snd_pcm(U)
snd_timer(U) snd(U) soundcore(U) snd_page_alloc(U) e1000(U) floppy(U)
sr_mod(U) cdrom(U) ata_generic(U) ext3(U) jbd(U) mbcache(U)
dm_snapshot(U) dm_zero(U) dm_mirror(U) dm_mod(U) ata_piix(U) libata(U)
sd_mod(U) scsi_mod(U)
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<6b6b6b6b>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010202 (2.6.21-1.3116.ONELAN #1)
EIP is at 0x6b6b6b6b
eax: dc2588d4 ebx: 6b6b6b6b ecx: cdf27000 edx: d4438c18
esi: dc2588d4 edi: c0711e94 ebp: d236df34 esp: d236df28
ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
Process udev (pid: 10208, ti=d236d000 task=ccccb550 task.ti=d236d000)
Stack: c05602bd cd383164 ce92457c d236df6c c04b6e2c c04421da c04849d0
00000000
de879e54 00001000 09e8e708 ce924598 d4438c18 dc2589ac d765dc24
c04b6d8c
09e8e708 d236df90 c047e706 d236df9c c0404fd4 00000000 00001000
d765dc24
Call Trace:
[<c0405e46>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x19/0x2e
[<c0405ef8>] show_stack_log_lvl+0x9d/0xa5
[<c04063bf>] show_registers+0x1d1/0x2a3
[<c04066c3>] die+0x12a/0x204
[<c0617fd9>] do_page_fault+0x3f5/0x4c1
[<c061674c>] error_code+0x7c/0x84
[<c04b6e2c>] sysfs_read_file+0xa0/0x14e
[<c047e706>] vfs_read+0xaf/0x163
[<c047f04d>] sys_read+0x3d/0x61
[<c0404f8c>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
=======================
Code: Bad EIP value.
EIP: [<6b6b6b6b>] 0x6b6b6b6b SS:ESP 0068:d236df28
Hi Barry,
On 14/05/07, Barry Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm testing the robustness of Xorg 1.3 server with intel 2.0 driver
> by restarting the X and a set of apps every 30 seconds. After
> about an hour this happened.
>
> 2.6.21-1.3116.ONELAN is the same as 2.6.21-1.3116 from FC7
> but with the spec file change so that we can run the kernel on an FC4
> system.
Ok, it's Fedora 7 kernel, so please visit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/index.cgi
Regards,
Michal
--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
Kernel Monkeys
(http://kernel.wikidot.com/start)
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
> On 14/05/07, Barry Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm testing the robustness of Xorg 1.3 server with intel 2.0 driver
> > by restarting the X and a set of apps every 30 seconds. After
> > about an hour this happened.
> >
> > 2.6.21-1.3116.ONELAN is the same as 2.6.21-1.3116 from FC7
> > but with the spec file change so that we can run the kernel on an FC4
> > system.
>
> Ok, it's Fedora 7 kernel, so please visit
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/index.cgi
For all intents and purposes here, that may as well be a vanilla 2.6.21.1
Reporting it there isn't going to get much more than a "*shrug* ask upstream"
from me.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi Barry,
> >
> > On 14/05/07, Barry Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I'm testing the robustness of Xorg 1.3 server with intel 2.0 driver
> > > by restarting the X and a set of apps every 30 seconds. After
> > > about an hour this happened.
> > >
> > > 2.6.21-1.3116.ONELAN is the same as 2.6.21-1.3116 from FC7
> > > but with the spec file change so that we can run the kernel on an FC4
> > > system.
> >
> > Ok, it's Fedora 7 kernel, so please visit
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/index.cgi
>
> For all intents and purposes here, that may as well be a vanilla 2.6.21.1
> Reporting it there isn't going to get much more than a "*shrug* ask upstream"
> from me.
>
>
Indeed I'm sure Fedora would point me here.
Anyone have any idea what wrong?
Barry