The macro EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE1 should use BIT, not BUT. Fix
does not have real effect as the macro is not used in the code.
Fixes: af2e0a0754ac ("ARM: EXYNOS: Add PMU support for exynos5420")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
index fc9250fb3133..4bfd9a210da2 100644
--- a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
@@ -613,7 +613,7 @@
/* For EXYNOS_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION */
#define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE0 BIT(16)
-#define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE1 BUT(17)
+#define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE1 BIT(17)
#define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFE_ARM_CORE0 BIT(24)
#define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFE_ARM_CORE1 BIT(25)
--
2.27.0
Hello Krzysztof
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 7:59 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The macro EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE1 should use BIT, not BUT. Fix
> does not have real effect as the macro is not used in the code.
>
Can we consider removing this? As this is not used in code.
> Fixes: af2e0a0754ac ("ARM: EXYNOS: Add PMU support for exynos5420")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> index fc9250fb3133..4bfd9a210da2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> @@ -613,7 +613,7 @@
>
> /* For EXYNOS_CENTRAL_SEQ_OPTION */
> #define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE0 BIT(16)
> -#define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE1 BUT(17)
> +#define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE1 BIT(17)
> #define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFE_ARM_CORE0 BIT(24)
> #define EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFE_ARM_CORE1 BIT(25)
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>
--
Regards,
Alim
On 19/05/2021 10:36, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 7:59 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The macro EXYNOS5_USE_STANDBYWFI_ARM_CORE1 should use BIT, not BUT. Fix
>> does not have real effect as the macro is not used in the code.
>>
> Can we consider removing this? As this is not used in code.
Sure, I guess, if someone needs this bit, can always check in the
documentation :)
Best regards,
Krzysztof