scsi_report_sense() is possble to print messages exceeding 128 bytes:
[ 475.156955] sd 9:0:0:0: Warning! Received an indication that the LUN assignments on this target have changed. The Linux SCSI layer does not automatical
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c
index b02af340c2d3..edc3fe8c7e0f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
static char *scsi_log_reserve_buffer(size_t *len)
{
- *len = 128;
+ *len = 256;
return kmalloc(*len, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
--
2.31.1
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022, Li Zhijian wrote:
> scsi_report_sense() is possble to print messages exceeding 128 bytes:
> [ 475.156955] sd 9:0:0:0: Warning! Received an indication that the LUN assignments on this target have changed. The Linux SCSI layer does not automatical
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c
> index b02af340c2d3..edc3fe8c7e0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>
> static char *scsi_log_reserve_buffer(size_t *len)
> {
> - *len = 128;
> + *len = 256;
> return kmalloc(*len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> }
>
Perhaps it's better to waste fewer words (both kinds). E.g.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index 49ef864df581..e7283bf23db3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -463,13 +463,11 @@ static void scsi_report_sense(struct scsi_device *sdev,
evt_type = SDEV_EVT_LUN_CHANGE_REPORTED;
scsi_report_lun_change(sdev);
sdev_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdev,
- "Warning! Received an indication that the "
"LUN assignments on this target have "
"changed. The Linux SCSI layer does not "
"automatically remap LUN assignments.\n");
} else if (sshdr->asc == 0x3f)
sdev_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdev,
- "Warning! Received an indication that the "
"operating parameters on this target have "
"changed. The Linux SCSI layer does not "
"automatically adjust these parameters.\n");
Sorry for the late reply. (Strange! this reply didn't arrive to my mailbox)
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2022, Li Zhijian wrote:
>
> > scsi_report_sense() is possble to print messages exceeding 128 bytes: > [ 475.156955] sd 9:0:0:0: Warning! Received an indication that the
> LUN assignments on this target have changed. The Linux SCSI layer does
> not automatical > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <[email protected]>
> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1
> insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git
> a/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c > index
> b02af340c2d3..edc3fe8c7e0f 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ > > static
> char *scsi_log_reserve_buffer(size_t *len) > { > - *len = 128; > +
> *len = 256; > return kmalloc(*len, GFP_ATOMIC); > } >
> Perhaps it's better to waste fewer words (both kinds). E.g.
Yes, it's an option. if no objection, i will apply your suggestion in
24h later. hahaha :)
Thanks
Zhijian
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index 49ef864df581..e7283bf23db3 100644 ---
> a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c @@ -463,13
> +463,11 @@ static void scsi_report_sense(struct scsi_device *sdev, evt_type = SDEV_EVT_LUN_CHANGE_REPORTED;
> scsi_report_lun_change(sdev);
> sdev_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdev,
> - "Warning! Received an indication that the " "LUN assignments on this target have "
> "changed. The Linux SCSI layer does not "
> "automatically remap LUN assignments.\n");
> } else if (sshdr->asc == 0x3f)
> sdev_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdev,
> - "Warning! Received an indication that the " "operating parameters on this target have "
> "changed. The Linux SCSI layer does not "
> "automatically adjust these parameters.\n");