2021-03-25 19:25:50

by Jann Horn

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: ARM FDPIC_FUNCPTRS personality flag handling looks broken

Hi!

Tavis noticed that on ARM kernels with CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_FDPIC, it
looks like the FDPIC_FUNCPTRS personality flag is not reset on
execve(). This would mean that if a process first executes an ELF
FDPIC binary (which forces the personality to PER_LINUX_FDPIC), and
then executes a non-FDPIC binary, the signal handling code
(setup_return()) will have bogus behavior (interpreting a normal
function pointer as an FDPIC function handle).

I think FDPIC_FUNCPTRS should probably either be reset on every
execve() or not be a personality flag at all (since AFAIU pretty much
the whole point of personality flags is that they control behavior
even across execve()).

(I don't have an FDPIC toolchain, so I'm writing this solely based on
having read the code, without having actually tested it.)


2021-03-25 19:57:18

by Nicolas Pitre

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: ARM FDPIC_FUNCPTRS personality flag handling looks broken

On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Jann Horn wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Tavis noticed that on ARM kernels with CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_FDPIC, it
> looks like the FDPIC_FUNCPTRS personality flag is not reset on
> execve(). This would mean that if a process first executes an ELF
> FDPIC binary (which forces the personality to PER_LINUX_FDPIC), and
> then executes a non-FDPIC binary, the signal handling code
> (setup_return()) will have bogus behavior (interpreting a normal
> function pointer as an FDPIC function handle).
>
> I think FDPIC_FUNCPTRS should probably either be reset on every
> execve() or not be a personality flag at all (since AFAIU pretty much
> the whole point of personality flags is that they control behavior
> even across execve()).

I think you're right. This is probably true for SH as well.
I'd recommend the former solution as being the least intrusive one.


Nicolas