2023-10-23 16:47:07

by Marco Pagani

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC PATCH] drm/test: add a test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem

This patch introduces an initial KUnit test suite for GEM objects
backed by shmem buffers.

Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile | 3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c | 303 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
index 3eee8636f847..f0a77e3e04d7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ config DRM_KUNIT_TEST
select DRM_EXPORT_FOR_TESTS if m
select DRM_KUNIT_TEST_HELPERS
select DRM_EXEC
+ select DRM_GEM_SHMEM_HELPER
default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
help
This builds unit tests for DRM. This option is not useful for
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
index ba7baa622675..b8227aab369e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_KUNIT_TEST) += \
drm_plane_helper_test.o \
drm_probe_helper_test.o \
drm_rect_test.o \
- drm_exec_test.o
+ drm_exec_test.o \
+ drm_gem_shmem_test.o

CFLAGS_drm_mm_test.o := $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0bf6727f08d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem buffers
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Red Hat, Inc.
+ *
+ * Author: Marco Pagani <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/dma-buf.h>
+#include <linux/iosys-map.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#include <drm/drm_device.h>
+#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
+#include <drm/drm_gem.h>
+#include <drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h>
+#include <drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h>
+
+#define TEST_SIZE SZ_1M
+#define TEST_BYTE 0xae
+
+struct fake_dev {
+ struct drm_device drm_dev;
+ struct device *dev;
+};
+
+/* Test creating a shmem GEM object */
+static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
+ struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
+
+ shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->base.size, TEST_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->base.filp);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->base.funcs);
+
+ drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
+}
+
+/* Test creating a private shmem GEM object from a scatter/gather table */
+static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
+ struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
+ struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj;
+ struct dma_buf buf_mock;
+ struct dma_buf_attachment attach_mock;
+ struct sg_table *sgt;
+ char *buf;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Create a mock scatter/gather table */
+ buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, buf);
+
+ sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);
+
+ ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+ sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);
+
+ /* Init a mock DMA-BUF */
+ buf_mock.size = TEST_SIZE;
+ attach_mock.dmabuf = &buf_mock;
+
+ gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);
+
+ shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);
+
+ /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
+ drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
+}
+
+/* Test pinning backing pages */
+static void drm_gem_shmem_test_pin_pages(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
+ struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->pages);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 0);
+
+ ret = drm_gem_shmem_pin(shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->pages);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 1);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < (shmem->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT); i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->pages[i]);
+
+ drm_gem_shmem_unpin(shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->pages);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 0);
+
+ drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
+}
+
+/* Test creating a virtual mapping */
+static void drm_gem_shmem_test_vmap(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
+ struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
+ struct iosys_map map;
+ int ret, i;
+
+ shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 0);
+
+ ret = drm_gem_shmem_vmap(shmem, &map);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 1);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, iosys_map_is_null(&map));
+
+ iosys_map_memset(&map, 0, TEST_BYTE, TEST_SIZE);
+ for (i = 0; i < TEST_SIZE; i++)
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, iosys_map_rd(&map, i, u8), TEST_BYTE);
+
+ drm_gem_shmem_vunmap(shmem, &map);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 0);
+
+ drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
+}
+
+/* Test exporting a scatter/gather table */
+static void drm_gem_shmem_test_get_pages_sgt(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
+ struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
+ struct sg_table *sgt;
+ struct scatterlist *sg;
+ unsigned int si, len = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
+
+ ret = drm_gem_shmem_pin(shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_sg_table(shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->sgt);
+
+ for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sg, si) {
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sg);
+ len += sg->length;
+ }
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, len, TEST_SIZE);
+
+ kfree(sgt);
+ drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
+}
+
+/* Test exporting a scatter/gather pinned table for PRIME */
+static void drm_gem_shmem_test_get_sg_table(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
+ struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
+ struct sg_table *sgt;
+ struct scatterlist *sg;
+ unsigned int si, len = 0;
+
+ shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
+
+ sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt(shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, sgt, shmem->sgt);
+
+ for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sg, si) {
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sg);
+ len += sg->length;
+ }
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, len, TEST_SIZE);
+
+ /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
+ drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
+}
+
+/* Test updating madvise status */
+static void drm_gem_shmem_test_madvise(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
+ struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
+ int ret;
+
+ shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, 0);
+
+ ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 1);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, 1);
+
+ ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, -1);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, -1);
+
+ ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 0);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, -1);
+
+ drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
+}
+
+/* Test purging */
+static void drm_gem_shmem_test_purge(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
+ struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
+ struct sg_table *sgt;
+ int ret;
+
+ shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
+
+ ret = drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret);
+
+ ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 1);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
+
+ sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt(shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt);
+
+ ret = drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
+
+ drm_gem_shmem_purge(shmem);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
+
+ drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
+}
+
+static int drm_gem_shmem_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct fake_dev *fdev;
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ /* Allocate a parent device */
+ dev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
+
+ /*
+ * The DRM core will automatically initialize the GEM core and create
+ * a DRM Memory Manager object which provides an address space pool
+ * for GEM objects allocation.
+ */
+ fdev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(test, dev, struct fake_dev,
+ drm_dev, DRIVER_GEM);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, fdev);
+
+ fdev->dev = dev;
+ test->priv = fdev;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void drm_gem_shmem_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
+
+ drm_kunit_helper_free_device(test, fdev->dev);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case drm_gem_shmem_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_gem_shmem_test_pin_pages),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_gem_shmem_test_vmap),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_gem_shmem_test_get_pages_sgt),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_gem_shmem_test_get_sg_table),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_gem_shmem_test_madvise),
+ KUNIT_CASE(drm_gem_shmem_test_purge),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite drm_gem_shmem_suite = {
+ .name = "drm_gem_shmem",
+ .init = drm_gem_shmem_test_init,
+ .exit = drm_gem_shmem_test_exit,
+ .test_cases = drm_gem_shmem_test_cases
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(drm_gem_shmem_suite);

base-commit: 3f5ba636d6987ddffeaa056dea1c524da63912f3
--
2.41.0


2023-10-24 09:43:14

by Maxime Ripard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/test: add a test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem

Hi Marco,

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 06:45:40PM +0200, Marco Pagani wrote:
> This patch introduces an initial KUnit test suite for GEM objects
> backed by shmem buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c | 303 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> index 3eee8636f847..f0a77e3e04d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ config DRM_KUNIT_TEST
> select DRM_EXPORT_FOR_TESTS if m
> select DRM_KUNIT_TEST_HELPERS
> select DRM_EXEC
> + select DRM_GEM_SHMEM_HELPER

I know that DRM_EXEC already stands out, but these should be ordered
alphabetically, so it should be before DRM_KUNIT_TEST_HELPERS.

> default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> help
> This builds unit tests for DRM. This option is not useful for
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
> index ba7baa622675..b8227aab369e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_KUNIT_TEST) += \
> drm_plane_helper_test.o \
> drm_probe_helper_test.o \
> drm_rect_test.o \
> - drm_exec_test.o
> + drm_exec_test.o \
> + drm_gem_shmem_test.o

Ditto.

> CFLAGS_drm_mm_test.o := $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0bf6727f08d2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * KUnit test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem buffers
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Red Hat, Inc.
> + *
> + * Author: Marco Pagani <[email protected]>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/dma-buf.h>
> +#include <linux/iosys-map.h>
> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_device.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_gem.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h>
> +
> +#define TEST_SIZE SZ_1M
> +#define TEST_BYTE 0xae
> +
> +struct fake_dev {
> + struct drm_device drm_dev;
> + struct device *dev;
> +};
> +
> +/* Test creating a shmem GEM object */
> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> +
> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->base.size, TEST_SIZE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->base.filp);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->base.funcs);
> +
> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test creating a private shmem GEM object from a scatter/gather table */

Thanks for documenting those tests. I believe we should also document
what we expect from the test: should the test succeed? fail? if it
fails, what is the cause of failure?

Based on the following test, I think something like the following would
be good:

Test that creating a private shmem GEM object from a previously
allocated sg_table succeeds and is properly initialized

Feel free to change it to something else if you find something missing.

> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> + struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj;
> + struct dma_buf buf_mock;
> + struct dma_buf_attachment attach_mock;
> + struct sg_table *sgt;
> + char *buf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Create a mock scatter/gather table */
> + buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, buf);
> +
> + sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);
> +
> + ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);
> +
> + /* Init a mock DMA-BUF */
> + buf_mock.size = TEST_SIZE;
> + attach_mock.dmabuf = &buf_mock;
> +
> + gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);
> +
> + shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);
> +
> + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> +}

KUNIT_ASSERT_* will stop the execution of the test on failure, you
should probably use a bit more of KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls otherwise you'll
leak resources.

You also probably want to use a kunit_action to clean up and avoid that
whole discussion

> +
> +/* Test pinning backing pages */
> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_pin_pages(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->pages);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 0);
> +
> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_pin(shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->pages);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 1);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < (shmem->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT); i++)
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->pages[i]);
> +
> + drm_gem_shmem_unpin(shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->pages);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 0);
> +
> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test creating a virtual mapping */
> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_vmap(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> + struct iosys_map map;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 0);
> +
> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_vmap(shmem, &map);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 1);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, iosys_map_is_null(&map));
> +
> + iosys_map_memset(&map, 0, TEST_BYTE, TEST_SIZE);
> + for (i = 0; i < TEST_SIZE; i++)
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, iosys_map_rd(&map, i, u8), TEST_BYTE);
> +
> + drm_gem_shmem_vunmap(shmem, &map);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 0);
> +
> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test exporting a scatter/gather table */
> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_get_pages_sgt(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> + struct sg_table *sgt;
> + struct scatterlist *sg;
> + unsigned int si, len = 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
> +
> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_pin(shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> + sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_sg_table(shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->sgt);
> +
> + for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sg, si) {
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sg);
> + len += sg->length;
> + }
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, len, TEST_SIZE);
> +
> + kfree(sgt);
> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test exporting a scatter/gather pinned table for PRIME */
> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_get_sg_table(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> + struct sg_table *sgt;
> + struct scatterlist *sg;
> + unsigned int si, len = 0;
> +
> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
> +
> + sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt(shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, sgt, shmem->sgt);
> +
> + for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sg, si) {
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sg);
> + len += sg->length;
> + }
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, len, TEST_SIZE);
> +
> + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test updating madvise status */
> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_madvise(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> + int ret;
> +
> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, 0);
> +
> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 1);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, 1);
> +
> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, -1);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, -1);
> +
> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, -1);
> +
> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test purging */
> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_purge(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> + struct sg_table *sgt;
> + int ret;
> +
> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
> +
> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret);
> +
> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 1);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
> +
> + sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt(shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt);
> +
> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
> +
> + drm_gem_shmem_purge(shmem);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
> +
> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> +}
> +
> +static int drm_gem_shmem_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct fake_dev *fdev;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + /* Allocate a parent device */
> + dev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
> +
> + /*
> + * The DRM core will automatically initialize the GEM core and create
> + * a DRM Memory Manager object which provides an address space pool
> + * for GEM objects allocation.
> + */
> + fdev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(test, dev, struct fake_dev,
> + drm_dev, DRIVER_GEM);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, fdev);
> +
> + fdev->dev = dev;
> + test->priv = fdev;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> +
> + drm_kunit_helper_free_device(test, fdev->dev);
> +}

You don't need to call drm_kunit_helper_free_device() anymore

Maxime


Attachments:
(No filename) (11.12 kB)
signature.asc (235.00 B)
Download all attachments

2023-10-24 17:15:57

by Marco Pagani

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/test: add a test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem



On 2023-10-24 11:23, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 06:45:40PM +0200, Marco Pagani wrote:
>> This patch introduces an initial KUnit test suite for GEM objects
>> backed by shmem buffers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c | 303 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
>> index 3eee8636f847..f0a77e3e04d7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ config DRM_KUNIT_TEST
>> select DRM_EXPORT_FOR_TESTS if m
>> select DRM_KUNIT_TEST_HELPERS
>> select DRM_EXEC
>> + select DRM_GEM_SHMEM_HELPER
>
> I know that DRM_EXEC already stands out, but these should be ordered
> alphabetically, so it should be before DRM_KUNIT_TEST_HELPERS.
>
>> default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
>> help
>> This builds unit tests for DRM. This option is not useful for
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
>> index ba7baa622675..b8227aab369e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/Makefile
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_KUNIT_TEST) += \
>> drm_plane_helper_test.o \
>> drm_probe_helper_test.o \
>> drm_rect_test.o \
>> - drm_exec_test.o
>> + drm_exec_test.o \
>> + drm_gem_shmem_test.o
>
> Ditto.
>

Right, I'll sort them alphabetically for v2.

>> CFLAGS_drm_mm_test.o := $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN)
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..0bf6727f08d2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_gem_shmem_test.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * KUnit test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem buffers
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Red Hat, Inc.
>> + *
>> + * Author: Marco Pagani <[email protected]>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/dma-buf.h>
>> +#include <linux/iosys-map.h>
>> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
>> +
>> +#include <kunit/test.h>
>> +
>> +#include <drm/drm_device.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_gem.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h>
>> +
>> +#define TEST_SIZE SZ_1M
>> +#define TEST_BYTE 0xae
>> +
>> +struct fake_dev {
>> + struct drm_device drm_dev;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Test creating a shmem GEM object */
>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
>> +
>> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->base.size, TEST_SIZE);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->base.filp);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->base.funcs);
>> +
>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Test creating a private shmem GEM object from a scatter/gather table */
>
> Thanks for documenting those tests. I believe we should also document
> what we expect from the test: should the test succeed? fail? if it
> fails, what is the cause of failure?
>
> Based on the following test, I think something like the following would
> be good:
>
> Test that creating a private shmem GEM object from a previously
> allocated sg_table succeeds and is properly initialized
>
> Feel free to change it to something else if you find something missing.
>

Sounds good to me. I'll improve the documentation for v2.

>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
>> + struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj;
>> + struct dma_buf buf_mock;
>> + struct dma_buf_attachment attach_mock;
>> + struct sg_table *sgt;
>> + char *buf;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + /* Create a mock scatter/gather table */
>> + buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, buf);
>> +
>> + sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);
>> +
>> + ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> + sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);
>> +
>> + /* Init a mock DMA-BUF */
>> + buf_mock.size = TEST_SIZE;
>> + attach_mock.dmabuf = &buf_mock;
>> +
>> + gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);
>> +
>> + shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);
>> +
>> + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
>> +}
>
> KUNIT_ASSERT_* will stop the execution of the test on failure, you
> should probably use a bit more of KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls otherwise you'll
> leak resources.
>
> You also probably want to use a kunit_action to clean up and avoid that
> whole discussion
>

You are right. I slightly prefer using KUnit expectations (unless actions
are strictly necessary) since I feel using actions makes test cases a bit
less straightforward to understand. Is this okay for you?

>> +
>> +/* Test pinning backing pages */
>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_pin_pages(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->pages);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 0);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_pin(shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->pages);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 1);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < (shmem->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT); i++)
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->pages[i]);
>> +
>> + drm_gem_shmem_unpin(shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->pages);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->pages_use_count, 0);
>> +
>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Test creating a virtual mapping */
>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_vmap(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
>> + struct iosys_map map;
>> + int ret, i;
>> +
>> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 0);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_vmap(shmem, &map);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 1);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, iosys_map_is_null(&map));
>> +
>> + iosys_map_memset(&map, 0, TEST_BYTE, TEST_SIZE);
>> + for (i = 0; i < TEST_SIZE; i++)
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, iosys_map_rd(&map, i, u8), TEST_BYTE);
>> +
>> + drm_gem_shmem_vunmap(shmem, &map);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->vaddr);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->vmap_use_count, 0);
>> +
>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Test exporting a scatter/gather table */
>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_get_pages_sgt(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
>> + struct sg_table *sgt;
>> + struct scatterlist *sg;
>> + unsigned int si, len = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_pin(shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>> +
>> + sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_sg_table(shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, shmem->sgt);
>> +
>> + for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sg, si) {
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sg);
>> + len += sg->length;
>> + }
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, len, TEST_SIZE);
>> +
>> + kfree(sgt);
>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Test exporting a scatter/gather pinned table for PRIME */
>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_get_sg_table(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
>> + struct sg_table *sgt;
>> + struct scatterlist *sg;
>> + unsigned int si, len = 0;
>> +
>> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
>> +
>> + sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt(shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, sgt, shmem->sgt);
>> +
>> + for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sg, si) {
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sg);
>> + len += sg->length;
>> + }
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE(test, len, TEST_SIZE);
>> +
>> + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Test updating madvise status */
>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_madvise(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, 0);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 1);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, 1);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, -1);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, -1);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 0);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, shmem->madv, -1);
>> +
>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Test purging */
>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_purge(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
>> + struct sg_table *sgt;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + shmem = drm_gem_shmem_create(&fdev->drm_dev, TEST_SIZE);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, shmem);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, ret);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, 1);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
>> +
>> + sgt = drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt(shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, sgt);
>> +
>> + ret = drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
>> +
>> + drm_gem_shmem_purge(shmem);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ret);
>> +
>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int drm_gem_shmem_test_init(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_dev *fdev;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + /* Allocate a parent device */
>> + dev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The DRM core will automatically initialize the GEM core and create
>> + * a DRM Memory Manager object which provides an address space pool
>> + * for GEM objects allocation.
>> + */
>> + fdev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(test, dev, struct fake_dev,
>> + drm_dev, DRIVER_GEM);
>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, fdev);
>> +
>> + fdev->dev = dev;
>> + test->priv = fdev;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
>> +
>> + drm_kunit_helper_free_device(test, fdev->dev);
>> +}
>
> You don't need to call drm_kunit_helper_free_device() anymore
>
> Maxime

Right. Initially, I accidentally used an older tree that did not include
commit 4f2b0b583baa4. I'll remove the whole exit function for v2.


Thanks,
Marco

2023-10-25 08:43:36

by Maxime Ripard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/test: add a test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:14:25PM +0200, Marco Pagani wrote:
> >> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private(struct kunit *test)
> >> +{
> >> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> >> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> >> + struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj;
> >> + struct dma_buf buf_mock;
> >> + struct dma_buf_attachment attach_mock;
> >> + struct sg_table *sgt;
> >> + char *buf;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + /* Create a mock scatter/gather table */
> >> + buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, buf);
> >> +
> >> + sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);
> >> +
> >> + ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> >> + sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);
> >> +
> >> + /* Init a mock DMA-BUF */
> >> + buf_mock.size = TEST_SIZE;
> >> + attach_mock.dmabuf = &buf_mock;
> >> +
> >> + gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
> >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
> >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
> >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
> >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);
> >> +
> >> + shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
> >> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);
> >> +
> >> + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
> >> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> >> +}
> >
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_* will stop the execution of the test on failure, you
> > should probably use a bit more of KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls otherwise you'll
> > leak resources.
> >
> > You also probably want to use a kunit_action to clean up and avoid that
> > whole discussion
> >
>
> You are right. I slightly prefer using KUnit expectations (unless actions
> are strictly necessary) since I feel using actions makes test cases a bit
> less straightforward to understand. Is this okay for you?

I disagree. Actions make it easier to reason about, even when comparing
assertion vs expectation

Like, for the call to sg_alloc_table and
drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(), the reasonable use of assert vs
expect would be something like:

sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);

ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);

/*
* Here, it's already not super clear whether you want to expect vs
* assert. expect will make you handle the failure case later, assert will
* force you to call kfree on sgt. Both kind of suck in their own ways.
*/

sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);

gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);

/*
* If the assert fails, we forgot to call sg_free_table(sgt) and kfree(sgt).
*/

KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);

/*
* And here we have to handle the case where the expectation was wrong,
* but the test still continued.
*/

But if you're not using an action, you still have to call kfree(sgt),
which means that you might still

shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);

/*
* If the assertion fails, we now have to call drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem)
*/

/* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);

/* everything's fine now */

The semantics around drm_gem_shmem_free make it a bit convoluted, but
doing it using goto/labels, plus handling the assertions and error
reporting would be difficult.

Using actions, we have:

sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);

ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, kfree_wrapper, sgt);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);

ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);

ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, sg_free_table_wrapper, sgt);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);

sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);

gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);

/* drm_gem_shmem_free will free the struct sg_table itself */
kunit_remove_action(test, sg_free_table_wrapper, sgt);
kunit_remove_action(test, kfree_wrapper, sgt);

shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);

ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, drm_gem_shmem_free_wrapper, shmem);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);

The last one is arguable, but for the previous ones it makes error
handling much more convenient and easy to reason about.

The wrappers are also a bit inconvenient to use, but it's mostly there
to avoid a compiler warning at the moment.

This patch will help hopefully:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/[email protected]/

Maxime


Attachments:
(No filename) (5.03 kB)
signature.asc (235.00 B)
Download all attachments

2023-10-30 10:59:26

by Marco Pagani

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/test: add a test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem



On 2023-10-25 10:43, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:14:25PM +0200, Marco Pagani wrote:
>>>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private(struct kunit *test)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
>>>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
>>>> + struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj;
>>>> + struct dma_buf buf_mock;
>>>> + struct dma_buf_attachment attach_mock;
>>>> + struct sg_table *sgt;
>>>> + char *buf;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Create a mock scatter/gather table */
>>>> + buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, buf);
>>>> +
>>>> + sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>>>> + sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Init a mock DMA-BUF */
>>>> + buf_mock.size = TEST_SIZE;
>>>> + attach_mock.dmabuf = &buf_mock;
>>>> +
>>>> + gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
>>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
>>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
>>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
>>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);
>>>> +
>>>> + shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
>>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
>>>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> KUNIT_ASSERT_* will stop the execution of the test on failure, you
>>> should probably use a bit more of KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls otherwise you'll
>>> leak resources.
>>>
>>> You also probably want to use a kunit_action to clean up and avoid that
>>> whole discussion
>>>
>>
>> You are right. I slightly prefer using KUnit expectations (unless actions
>> are strictly necessary) since I feel using actions makes test cases a bit
>> less straightforward to understand. Is this okay for you?
>
> I disagree. Actions make it easier to reason about, even when comparing
> assertion vs expectation
>
> Like, for the call to sg_alloc_table and
> drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(), the reasonable use of assert vs
> expect would be something like:
>
> sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);
>
> ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>
> /*
> * Here, it's already not super clear whether you want to expect vs
> * assert. expect will make you handle the failure case later, assert will
> * force you to call kfree on sgt. Both kind of suck in their own ways.
> */
>
> sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);
>
> gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
>
> /*
> * If the assert fails, we forgot to call sg_free_table(sgt) and kfree(sgt).
> */
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);
>
> /*
> * And here we have to handle the case where the expectation was wrong,
> * but the test still continued.
> */
>
> But if you're not using an action, you still have to call kfree(sgt),
> which means that you might still
>
> shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);
>
> /*
> * If the assertion fails, we now have to call drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem)
> */
>
> /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
> drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
>
> /* everything's fine now */
>
> The semantics around drm_gem_shmem_free make it a bit convoluted, but
> doing it using goto/labels, plus handling the assertions and error
> reporting would be difficult.
>
> Using actions, we have:
>
> sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);
>
> ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, kfree_wrapper, sgt);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>
> ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>
> ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, sg_free_table_wrapper, sgt);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>
> sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);
>
> gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);
>
> /* drm_gem_shmem_free will free the struct sg_table itself */
> kunit_remove_action(test, sg_free_table_wrapper, sgt);
> kunit_remove_action(test, kfree_wrapper, sgt);

I agree that using actions makes error handling cleaner. However, I still
have some concerns about the additional complexity that actions introduce.
For instance, I feel these two lines make the testing harness more complex
without asserting any additional property of the component under test.

In some sense, I wonder if it is worth worrying about memory leaks when
a test case fails. At that point, the system is already in an inconsistent
state due to a bug in the component under test, so it is unsafe to continue
anyway.

>
> shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);
>
> ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, drm_gem_shmem_free_wrapper, shmem);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>
> The last one is arguable, but for the previous ones it makes error
> handling much more convenient and easy to reason about.
>
> The wrappers are also a bit inconvenient to use, but it's mostly there
> to avoid a compiler warning at the moment.
>
> This patch will help hopefully:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/[email protected]/
>
> Maxime

Thanks,
Marco

2023-11-06 13:46:56

by Maxime Ripard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm/test: add a test suite for GEM objects backed by shmem

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:58:20AM +0100, Marco Pagani wrote:
> On 2023-10-25 10:43, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:14:25PM +0200, Marco Pagani wrote:
> >>>> +static void drm_gem_shmem_test_obj_create_private(struct kunit *test)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct fake_dev *fdev = test->priv;
> >>>> + struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
> >>>> + struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj;
> >>>> + struct dma_buf buf_mock;
> >>>> + struct dma_buf_attachment attach_mock;
> >>>> + struct sg_table *sgt;
> >>>> + char *buf;
> >>>> + int ret;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* Create a mock scatter/gather table */
> >>>> + buf = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, buf);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> >>>> + sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* Init a mock DMA-BUF */
> >>>> + buf_mock.size = TEST_SIZE;
> >>>> + attach_mock.dmabuf = &buf_mock;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
> >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
> >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
> >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
> >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
> >>>> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
> >>>> + drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> >>>> +}
> >>>
> >>> KUNIT_ASSERT_* will stop the execution of the test on failure, you
> >>> should probably use a bit more of KUNIT_EXPECT_* calls otherwise you'll
> >>> leak resources.
> >>>
> >>> You also probably want to use a kunit_action to clean up and avoid that
> >>> whole discussion
> >>>
> >>
> >> You are right. I slightly prefer using KUnit expectations (unless actions
> >> are strictly necessary) since I feel using actions makes test cases a bit
> >> less straightforward to understand. Is this okay for you?
> >
> > I disagree. Actions make it easier to reason about, even when comparing
> > assertion vs expectation
> >
> > Like, for the call to sg_alloc_table and
> > drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(), the reasonable use of assert vs
> > expect would be something like:
> >
> > sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);
> >
> > ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> >
> > /*
> > * Here, it's already not super clear whether you want to expect vs
> > * assert. expect will make you handle the failure case later, assert will
> > * force you to call kfree on sgt. Both kind of suck in their own ways.
> > */
> >
> > sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);
> >
> > gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
> >
> > /*
> > * If the assert fails, we forgot to call sg_free_table(sgt) and kfree(sgt).
> > */
> >
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);
> >
> > /*
> > * And here we have to handle the case where the expectation was wrong,
> > * but the test still continued.
> > */
> >
> > But if you're not using an action, you still have to call kfree(sgt),
> > which means that you might still
> >
> > shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(gem_obj);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(test, shmem->sgt, sgt);
> >
> > /*
> > * If the assertion fails, we now have to call drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem)
> > */
> >
> > /* The scatter/gather table is freed by drm_gem_shmem_free */
> > drm_gem_shmem_free(shmem);
> >
> > /* everything's fine now */
> >
> > The semantics around drm_gem_shmem_free make it a bit convoluted, but
> > doing it using goto/labels, plus handling the assertions and error
> > reporting would be difficult.
> >
> > Using actions, we have:
> >
> > sgt = kzalloc(sizeof(*sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sgt);
> >
> > ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, kfree_wrapper, sgt);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> >
> > ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> >
> > ret = kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, sg_free_table_wrapper, sgt);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> >
> > sg_init_one(sgt->sgl, buf, TEST_SIZE);
> >
> > gem_obj = drm_gem_shmem_prime_import_sg_table(&fdev->drm_dev, &attach_mock, sgt);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, gem_obj);
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gem_obj->size, TEST_SIZE);
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, gem_obj->filp);
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_NULL(test, gem_obj->funcs);
> >
> > /* drm_gem_shmem_free will free the struct sg_table itself */
> > kunit_remove_action(test, sg_free_table_wrapper, sgt);
> > kunit_remove_action(test, kfree_wrapper, sgt);
>
> I agree that using actions makes error handling cleaner. However, I still
> have some concerns about the additional complexity that actions introduce.
> For instance, I feel these two lines make the testing harness more complex
> without asserting any additional property of the component under test.

If anything, the API makes it more difficult to deal with. It would
actually be harder/messier to handle without an action.

> In some sense, I wonder if it is worth worrying about memory leaks when
> a test case fails. At that point, the system is already in an inconsistent
> state due to a bug in the component under test, so it is unsafe to continue
> anyway.

I guess the larger issue is: once that code will be merged, we're going
to have patches to convert to actions because they make it nicer and fix
a couple of issues anyway.

So, if it's still the state we're going to end up in, why not doing it
right from the beginning?

Maxime


Attachments:
(No filename) (5.94 kB)
signature.asc (235.00 B)
Download all attachments