From: Zqiang <[email protected]>
The intent of the CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD Konfig option is to
cause normal grace periods to complete quickly in order to better catch
errors resulting from improperly leaking pointers from RCU read-side
critical sections. However, kernels built with this option enabled still
wait for some hundreds of milliseconds before boosting RCU readers that
have been preempted within their current critical section. The value
of this delay is set by the CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY Kconfig option,
which defaults to 500 milliseconds.
This commit therefore causes kernels build with strict grace periods
to ignore CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY. This causes rcu_initiate_boost()
to start boosting immediately after all CPUs on a given leaf rcu_node
structure have passed through their quiescent states.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 440d9e02a26e0..53d05eb804121 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1140,7 +1140,8 @@ static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
(rnp->gp_tasks != NULL &&
rnp->boost_tasks == NULL &&
rnp->qsmask == 0 &&
- (!time_after(rnp->boost_time, jiffies) || rcu_state.cbovld))) {
+ (!time_after(rnp->boost_time, jiffies) || rcu_state.cbovld ||
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD)))) {
if (rnp->exp_tasks == NULL)
WRITE_ONCE(rnp->boost_tasks, rnp->gp_tasks);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
On 6/21/2022 3:50 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Zqiang <[email protected]>
>
> The intent of the CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD Konfig option is to
> cause normal grace periods to complete quickly in order to better catch
> errors resulting from improperly leaking pointers from RCU read-side
> critical sections. However, kernels built with this option enabled still
> wait for some hundreds of milliseconds before boosting RCU readers that
> have been preempted within their current critical section. The value
> of this delay is set by the CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY Kconfig option,
> which defaults to 500 milliseconds.
>
> This commit therefore causes kernels build with strict grace periods
> to ignore CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY. This causes rcu_initiate_boost()
> to start boosting immediately after all CPUs on a given leaf rcu_node
> structure have passed through their quiescent states.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <[email protected]>
Thanks
Neeraj
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 440d9e02a26e0..53d05eb804121 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,8 @@ static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
> (rnp->gp_tasks != NULL &&
> rnp->boost_tasks == NULL &&
> rnp->qsmask == 0 &&
> - (!time_after(rnp->boost_time, jiffies) || rcu_state.cbovld))) {
> + (!time_after(rnp->boost_time, jiffies) || rcu_state.cbovld ||
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD)))) {
> if (rnp->exp_tasks == NULL)
> WRITE_ONCE(rnp->boost_tasks, rnp->gp_tasks);
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);