2022-11-18 10:38:03

by Mel Gorman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: Leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations

The pcp_spin_lock_irqsave protecting the PCP lists is IRQ-safe as a task
allocating from the PCP must not re-enter the allocator from IRQ context.
In each instance where IRQ-reentrancy is possible, the lock is acquired
using pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave() even though IRQs are disabled and
re-entrancy is impossible.

Demote the lock to pcp_spin_lock avoids an IRQ disable/enable in the common
case at the cost of some IRQ allocations taking a slower path. If the PCP
lists need to be refilled, the zone lock still needs to disable IRQs but
that will only happen on PCP refill and drain. If an IRQ is raised when
a PCP allocation is in progress, the trylock will fail and fallback to
using the buddy lists directly. Note that this may not be a universal win
if an interrupt-intensive workload also allocates heavily from interrupt
context and contends heavily on the zone->lock as a result.

[[email protected]: Reported lockdep issue on IO completion from softirq]
[[email protected]: Fix list corruption, lock improvements, micro-optimsations]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 1ec54173b8d4..323fec05c4c6 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -170,21 +170,12 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcp_batch_high_lock);
_ret; \
})

-#define pcpu_spin_lock_irqsave(type, member, ptr, flags) \
+#define pcpu_spin_trylock(type, member, ptr) \
({ \
type *_ret; \
pcpu_task_pin(); \
_ret = this_cpu_ptr(ptr); \
- spin_lock_irqsave(&_ret->member, flags); \
- _ret; \
-})
-
-#define pcpu_spin_trylock_irqsave(type, member, ptr, flags) \
-({ \
- type *_ret; \
- pcpu_task_pin(); \
- _ret = this_cpu_ptr(ptr); \
- if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&_ret->member, flags)) { \
+ if (!spin_trylock(&_ret->member)) { \
pcpu_task_unpin(); \
_ret = NULL; \
} \
@@ -197,27 +188,16 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcp_batch_high_lock);
pcpu_task_unpin(); \
})

-#define pcpu_spin_unlock_irqrestore(member, ptr, flags) \
-({ \
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ptr->member, flags); \
- pcpu_task_unpin(); \
-})
-
/* struct per_cpu_pages specific helpers. */
#define pcp_spin_lock(ptr) \
pcpu_spin_lock(struct per_cpu_pages, lock, ptr)

-#define pcp_spin_lock_irqsave(ptr, flags) \
- pcpu_spin_lock_irqsave(struct per_cpu_pages, lock, ptr, flags)
-
-#define pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave(ptr, flags) \
- pcpu_spin_trylock_irqsave(struct per_cpu_pages, lock, ptr, flags)
+#define pcp_spin_trylock(ptr) \
+ pcpu_spin_trylock(struct per_cpu_pages, lock, ptr)

#define pcp_spin_unlock(ptr) \
pcpu_spin_unlock(lock, ptr)

-#define pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(ptr, flags) \
- pcpu_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, ptr, flags)
#ifdef CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, numa_node);
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(numa_node);
@@ -1547,6 +1527,7 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
struct per_cpu_pages *pcp,
int pindex)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
int min_pindex = 0;
int max_pindex = NR_PCP_LISTS - 1;
unsigned int order;
@@ -1562,8 +1543,7 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
/* Ensure requested pindex is drained first. */
pindex = pindex - 1;

- /* Caller must hold IRQ-safe pcp->lock so IRQs are disabled. */
- spin_lock(&zone->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
isolated_pageblocks = has_isolate_pageblock(zone);

while (count > 0) {
@@ -1611,7 +1591,7 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
} while (count > 0 && !list_empty(list));
}

- spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
}

static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone,
@@ -3125,10 +3105,10 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
unsigned long count, struct list_head *list,
int migratetype, unsigned int alloc_flags)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
int i, allocated = 0;

- /* Caller must hold IRQ-safe pcp->lock so IRQs are disabled. */
- spin_lock(&zone->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
struct page *page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype,
alloc_flags);
@@ -3162,7 +3142,7 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
* pages added to the pcp list.
*/
__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(i << order));
- spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
return allocated;
}

@@ -3179,16 +3159,9 @@ void drain_zone_pages(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp)
batch = READ_ONCE(pcp->batch);
to_drain = min(pcp->count, batch);
if (to_drain > 0) {
- unsigned long flags;
-
- /*
- * free_pcppages_bulk expects IRQs disabled for zone->lock
- * so even though pcp->lock is not intended to be IRQ-safe,
- * it's needed in this context.
- */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pcp->lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&pcp->lock);
free_pcppages_bulk(zone, to_drain, pcp, 0);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcp->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&pcp->lock);
}
}
#endif
@@ -3202,12 +3175,9 @@ static void drain_pages_zone(unsigned int cpu, struct zone *zone)

pcp = per_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset, cpu);
if (pcp->count) {
- unsigned long flags;
-
- /* See drain_zone_pages on why this is disabling IRQs */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pcp->lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&pcp->lock);
free_pcppages_bulk(zone, pcp->count, pcp, 0);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcp->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&pcp->lock);
}
}

@@ -3473,7 +3443,6 @@ static void free_unref_page_commit(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp,
*/
void free_unref_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
{
- unsigned long flags;
unsigned long __maybe_unused UP_flags;
struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
struct zone *zone;
@@ -3501,10 +3470,10 @@ void free_unref_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)

zone = page_zone(page);
pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
- pcp = pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave(zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
+ pcp = pcp_spin_trylock(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
if (pcp) {
free_unref_page_commit(zone, pcp, page, migratetype, order);
- pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
+ pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
} else {
free_one_page(zone, page, pfn, order, migratetype, FPI_NONE);
}
@@ -3516,10 +3485,10 @@ void free_unref_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
*/
void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
{
+ unsigned long __maybe_unused UP_flags;
struct page *page, *next;
struct per_cpu_pages *pcp = NULL;
struct zone *locked_zone = NULL;
- unsigned long flags;
int batch_count = 0;
int migratetype;

@@ -3550,11 +3519,26 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)

/* Different zone, different pcp lock. */
if (zone != locked_zone) {
- if (pcp)
- pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
+ if (pcp) {
+ pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
+ pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
+ }

+ /*
+ * trylock is necessary as pages may be getting freed
+ * from IRQ or SoftIRQ context after an IO completion.
+ */
+ pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
+ pcp = pcp_spin_trylock(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
+ if (!pcp) {
+ pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
+ free_one_page(zone, page, page_to_pfn(page),
+ 0, migratetype, FPI_NONE);
+ locked_zone = NULL;
+ continue;
+ }
locked_zone = zone;
- pcp = pcp_spin_lock_irqsave(locked_zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
+ batch_count = 0;
}

/*
@@ -3569,18 +3553,23 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
free_unref_page_commit(zone, pcp, page, migratetype, 0);

/*
- * Guard against excessive IRQ disabled times when we get
- * a large list of pages to free.
+ * Guard against excessive lock hold times when freeing
+ * a large list of pages. Lock will be reacquired if
+ * necessary on the next iteration.
*/
if (++batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
- pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
+ pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
+ pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
batch_count = 0;
- pcp = pcp_spin_lock_irqsave(locked_zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
+ pcp = NULL;
+ locked_zone = NULL;
}
}

- if (pcp)
- pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
+ if (pcp) {
+ pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
+ pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
+ }
}

/*
@@ -3781,15 +3770,11 @@ static struct page *rmqueue_pcplist(struct zone *preferred_zone,
struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
struct list_head *list;
struct page *page;
- unsigned long flags;
unsigned long __maybe_unused UP_flags;

- /*
- * spin_trylock may fail due to a parallel drain. In the future, the
- * trylock will also protect against IRQ reentrancy.
- */
+ /* spin_trylock may fail due to a parallel drain or IRQ reentrancy. */
pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
- pcp = pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave(zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
+ pcp = pcp_spin_trylock(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
if (!pcp) {
pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
return NULL;
@@ -3803,7 +3788,7 @@ static struct page *rmqueue_pcplist(struct zone *preferred_zone,
pcp->free_factor >>= 1;
list = &pcp->lists[order_to_pindex(migratetype, order)];
page = __rmqueue_pcplist(zone, order, migratetype, alloc_flags, pcp, list);
- pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
+ pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
if (page) {
__count_zid_vm_events(PGALLOC, page_zonenum(page), 1 << order);
@@ -5371,7 +5356,6 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
struct page **page_array)
{
struct page *page;
- unsigned long flags;
unsigned long __maybe_unused UP_flags;
struct zone *zone;
struct zoneref *z;
@@ -5453,9 +5437,9 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
if (unlikely(!zone))
goto failed;

- /* Is a parallel drain in progress? */
+ /* spin_trylock may fail due to a parallel drain or IRQ reentrancy. */
pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
- pcp = pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave(zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
+ pcp = pcp_spin_trylock(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
if (!pcp)
goto failed_irq;

@@ -5474,7 +5458,7 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
if (unlikely(!page)) {
/* Try and allocate at least one page */
if (!nr_account) {
- pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
+ pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
goto failed_irq;
}
break;
@@ -5489,7 +5473,7 @@ unsigned long __alloc_pages_bulk(gfp_t gfp, int preferred_nid,
nr_populated++;
}

- pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
+ pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);

__count_zid_vm_events(PGALLOC, zone_idx(zone), nr_account);
--
2.35.3



2022-11-18 14:50:20

by Vlastimil Babka

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: Leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations

On 11/18/22 11:17, Mel Gorman wrote:
> The pcp_spin_lock_irqsave protecting the PCP lists is IRQ-safe as a task
> allocating from the PCP must not re-enter the allocator from IRQ context.
> In each instance where IRQ-reentrancy is possible, the lock is acquired
> using pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave() even though IRQs are disabled and
> re-entrancy is impossible.
>
> Demote the lock to pcp_spin_lock avoids an IRQ disable/enable in the common
> case at the cost of some IRQ allocations taking a slower path. If the PCP
> lists need to be refilled, the zone lock still needs to disable IRQs but
> that will only happen on PCP refill and drain. If an IRQ is raised when
> a PCP allocation is in progress, the trylock will fail and fallback to
> using the buddy lists directly. Note that this may not be a universal win
> if an interrupt-intensive workload also allocates heavily from interrupt
> context and contends heavily on the zone->lock as a result.
>
> [[email protected]: Reported lockdep issue on IO completion from softirq]
> [[email protected]: Fix list corruption, lock improvements, micro-optimsations]
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>

Some nits below:

> @@ -3516,10 +3485,10 @@ void free_unref_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> */
> void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> {
> + unsigned long __maybe_unused UP_flags;
> struct page *page, *next;
> struct per_cpu_pages *pcp = NULL;
> struct zone *locked_zone = NULL;
> - unsigned long flags;
> int batch_count = 0;
> int migratetype;
>
> @@ -3550,11 +3519,26 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
>
> /* Different zone, different pcp lock. */
> if (zone != locked_zone) {
> - if (pcp)
> - pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
> + if (pcp) {
> + pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
> + pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> + }
>
> + /*
> + * trylock is necessary as pages may be getting freed
> + * from IRQ or SoftIRQ context after an IO completion.
> + */
> + pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
> + pcp = pcp_spin_trylock(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
> + if (!pcp) {

Perhaps use unlikely() here?

> + pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> + free_one_page(zone, page, page_to_pfn(page),
> + 0, migratetype, FPI_NONE);

Not critical for correctness, but the migratepage here might be stale and we
should do get_pcppage_migratetype(page);

> + locked_zone = NULL;
> + continue;
> + }
> locked_zone = zone;
> - pcp = pcp_spin_lock_irqsave(locked_zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
> + batch_count = 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -3569,18 +3553,23 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> free_unref_page_commit(zone, pcp, page, migratetype, 0);
>
> /*
> - * Guard against excessive IRQ disabled times when we get
> - * a large list of pages to free.
> + * Guard against excessive lock hold times when freeing
> + * a large list of pages. Lock will be reacquired if
> + * necessary on the next iteration.
> */
> if (++batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
> - pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
> + pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
> + pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> batch_count = 0;
> - pcp = pcp_spin_lock_irqsave(locked_zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
> + pcp = NULL;
> + locked_zone = NULL;

AFAICS if this block was just "locked_zone = NULL;" then the existing code
would do the right thing.
Or maybe to have simpler code, just do batch_count++ here and
make the relocking check do
if (zone != locked_zone || batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)

> }
> }
>
> - if (pcp)
> - pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
> + if (pcp) {
> + pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
> + pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> + }
> }
>
> /*


2022-11-21 12:21:48

by Mel Gorman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: Leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 03:30:57PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/18/22 11:17, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > The pcp_spin_lock_irqsave protecting the PCP lists is IRQ-safe as a task
> > allocating from the PCP must not re-enter the allocator from IRQ context.
> > In each instance where IRQ-reentrancy is possible, the lock is acquired
> > using pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave() even though IRQs are disabled and
> > re-entrancy is impossible.
> >
> > Demote the lock to pcp_spin_lock avoids an IRQ disable/enable in the common
> > case at the cost of some IRQ allocations taking a slower path. If the PCP
> > lists need to be refilled, the zone lock still needs to disable IRQs but
> > that will only happen on PCP refill and drain. If an IRQ is raised when
> > a PCP allocation is in progress, the trylock will fail and fallback to
> > using the buddy lists directly. Note that this may not be a universal win
> > if an interrupt-intensive workload also allocates heavily from interrupt
> > context and contends heavily on the zone->lock as a result.
> >
> > [[email protected]: Reported lockdep issue on IO completion from softirq]
> > [[email protected]: Fix list corruption, lock improvements, micro-optimsations]
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
>
> Some nits below:
>

Thanks.

> > @@ -3516,10 +3485,10 @@ void free_unref_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> > */
> > void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> > {
> > + unsigned long __maybe_unused UP_flags;
> > struct page *page, *next;
> > struct per_cpu_pages *pcp = NULL;
> > struct zone *locked_zone = NULL;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > int batch_count = 0;
> > int migratetype;
> >
> > @@ -3550,11 +3519,26 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> >
> > /* Different zone, different pcp lock. */
> > if (zone != locked_zone) {
> > - if (pcp)
> > - pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
> > + if (pcp) {
> > + pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
> > + pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> > + }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * trylock is necessary as pages may be getting freed
> > + * from IRQ or SoftIRQ context after an IO completion.
> > + */
> > + pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
> > + pcp = pcp_spin_trylock(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
> > + if (!pcp) {
>
> Perhaps use unlikely() here?
>

Sure, I'm less convinced these days that unlikely makes a big difference
with improvements to branch prediction but there is no harm in annotating
it. It's probably time to do a round of PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES checking.

> > + pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> > + free_one_page(zone, page, page_to_pfn(page),
> > + 0, migratetype, FPI_NONE);
>
> Not critical for correctness, but the migratepage here might be stale and we
> should do get_pcppage_migratetype(page);
>

Yes, the call should move up. Isolated pages should already have been
removed and while it's possible there would still be a race, it's unlikely
and no worse than the existing isolated page checks.

> > + locked_zone = NULL;
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > locked_zone = zone;
> > - pcp = pcp_spin_lock_irqsave(locked_zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
> > + batch_count = 0;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -3569,18 +3553,23 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> > free_unref_page_commit(zone, pcp, page, migratetype, 0);
> >
> > /*
> > - * Guard against excessive IRQ disabled times when we get
> > - * a large list of pages to free.
> > + * Guard against excessive lock hold times when freeing
> > + * a large list of pages. Lock will be reacquired if
> > + * necessary on the next iteration.
> > */
> > if (++batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
> > - pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);
> > + pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
> > + pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> > batch_count = 0;
> > - pcp = pcp_spin_lock_irqsave(locked_zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
> > + pcp = NULL;
> > + locked_zone = NULL;
>
> AFAICS if this block was just "locked_zone = NULL;" then the existing code
> would do the right thing.
> Or maybe to have simpler code, just do batch_count++ here and
> make the relocking check do
> if (zone != locked_zone || batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
>

While I think you're right, I think it's a bit subtle, the batch reset would
need to move, rechecked within the "Different zone, different pcp lock."
block and it would be easy to forget exactly why it's structured like
that in the future. Rather than being a fix, it could be a standalone
patch so it would be obvious in git blame but I don't feel particularly
strongly about it.

For the actual fixes to the patch, how about this? It's boot-tested only
as I find it hard to believe it would make a difference to performance.

--8<--
mm/page_alloc: Leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations -fix

As noted by Vlastimil Babka, the migratetype might be wrong if a PCP
fails to lock so check the migrate type early. Similarly the !pcp check
is generally unlikely so explicitly tagging it makes sense.

This is a fix for the mm-unstable patch
mm-page_alloc-leave-irqs-enabled-for-per-cpu-page-allocations.patch

Reported-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 323fec05c4c6..445066617204 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3516,6 +3516,7 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);

list_del(&page->lru);
+ migratetype = get_pcppage_migratetype(page);

/* Different zone, different pcp lock. */
if (zone != locked_zone) {
@@ -3530,7 +3531,7 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
*/
pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
pcp = pcp_spin_trylock(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
- if (!pcp) {
+ if (unlikely(!pcp)) {
pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
free_one_page(zone, page, page_to_pfn(page),
0, migratetype, FPI_NONE);
@@ -3545,7 +3546,6 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
* Non-isolated types over MIGRATE_PCPTYPES get added
* to the MIGRATE_MOVABLE pcp list.
*/
- migratetype = get_pcppage_migratetype(page);
if (unlikely(migratetype >= MIGRATE_PCPTYPES))
migratetype = MIGRATE_MOVABLE;


--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

2022-11-21 16:15:20

by Mel Gorman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: Leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:01:23PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 03:30:57PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 11/18/22 11:17, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > AFAICS if this block was just "locked_zone = NULL;" then the existing code
> > would do the right thing.
> > Or maybe to have simpler code, just do batch_count++ here and
> > make the relocking check do
> > if (zone != locked_zone || batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> >
>
> While I think you're right, I think it's a bit subtle, the batch reset would
> need to move, rechecked within the "Different zone, different pcp lock."
> block and it would be easy to forget exactly why it's structured like
> that in the future. Rather than being a fix, it could be a standalone
> patch so it would be obvious in git blame but I don't feel particularly
> strongly about it.
>

Ok, less subtle than I initially thought but still deserving of a separate
patch instead of being a fix. This?

--8<--
mm/page_alloc: Simplify locking during free_unref_page_list

While freeing a large list, the zone lock will be released and reacquired
to avoid long hold times since commit c24ad77d962c ("mm/page_alloc.c: avoid
excessive IRQ disabled times in free_unref_page_list()"). As suggested
by Vlastimil Babka, the lockrelease/reacquire logic can be simplified by
reusing the logic that acquires a different lock when changing zones.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 25 +++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 445066617204..08e32daf0918 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3518,13 +3518,19 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
list_del(&page->lru);
migratetype = get_pcppage_migratetype(page);

- /* Different zone, different pcp lock. */
- if (zone != locked_zone) {
+ /*
+ * Either different zone requiring a different pcp lock or
+ * excessive lock hold times when freeing a large list of
+ * pages.
+ */
+ if (zone != locked_zone || batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
if (pcp) {
pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
}

+ batch_count = 0;
+
/*
* trylock is necessary as pages may be getting freed
* from IRQ or SoftIRQ context after an IO completion.
@@ -3539,7 +3545,6 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
continue;
}
locked_zone = zone;
- batch_count = 0;
}

/*
@@ -3551,19 +3556,7 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)

trace_mm_page_free_batched(page);
free_unref_page_commit(zone, pcp, page, migratetype, 0);
-
- /*
- * Guard against excessive lock hold times when freeing
- * a large list of pages. Lock will be reacquired if
- * necessary on the next iteration.
- */
- if (++batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
- pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
- pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
- batch_count = 0;
- pcp = NULL;
- locked_zone = NULL;
- }
+ batch_count++;
}

if (pcp) {

2022-11-22 10:09:18

by Vlastimil Babka

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: Leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations

On 11/21/22 13:01, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 03:30:57PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 11/18/22 11:17, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> While I think you're right, I think it's a bit subtle, the batch reset would
> need to move, rechecked within the "Different zone, different pcp lock."
> block and it would be easy to forget exactly why it's structured like
> that in the future. Rather than being a fix, it could be a standalone
> patch so it would be obvious in git blame but I don't feel particularly
> strongly about it.
>
> For the actual fixes to the patch, how about this? It's boot-tested only
> as I find it hard to believe it would make a difference to performance.

Looks good. Shouldn't make a difference indeed.

>
> --8<--
> mm/page_alloc: Leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations -fix
>
> As noted by Vlastimil Babka, the migratetype might be wrong if a PCP
> fails to lock so check the migrate type early. Similarly the !pcp check
> is generally unlikely so explicitly tagging it makes sense.
>
> This is a fix for the mm-unstable patch
> mm-page_alloc-leave-irqs-enabled-for-per-cpu-page-allocations.patch
>
> Reported-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>

> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 323fec05c4c6..445066617204 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3516,6 +3516,7 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
>
> list_del(&page->lru);
> + migratetype = get_pcppage_migratetype(page);
>
> /* Different zone, different pcp lock. */
> if (zone != locked_zone) {
> @@ -3530,7 +3531,7 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> */
> pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
> pcp = pcp_spin_trylock(zone->per_cpu_pageset);
> - if (!pcp) {
> + if (unlikely(!pcp)) {
> pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> free_one_page(zone, page, page_to_pfn(page),
> 0, migratetype, FPI_NONE);
> @@ -3545,7 +3546,6 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> * Non-isolated types over MIGRATE_PCPTYPES get added
> * to the MIGRATE_MOVABLE pcp list.
> */
> - migratetype = get_pcppage_migratetype(page);
> if (unlikely(migratetype >= MIGRATE_PCPTYPES))
> migratetype = MIGRATE_MOVABLE;
>
>

2022-11-22 10:15:20

by Vlastimil Babka

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_alloc: Leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations

On 11/21/22 17:03, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:01:23PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 03:30:57PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> > On 11/18/22 11:17, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> > AFAICS if this block was just "locked_zone = NULL;" then the existing code
>> > would do the right thing.
>> > Or maybe to have simpler code, just do batch_count++ here and
>> > make the relocking check do
>> > if (zone != locked_zone || batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
>> >
>>
>> While I think you're right, I think it's a bit subtle, the batch reset would
>> need to move, rechecked within the "Different zone, different pcp lock."
>> block and it would be easy to forget exactly why it's structured like
>> that in the future. Rather than being a fix, it could be a standalone
>> patch so it would be obvious in git blame but I don't feel particularly
>> strongly about it.
>>
>
> Ok, less subtle than I initially thought but still deserving of a separate
> patch instead of being a fix. This?

Yeah, thanks!

> --8<--
> mm/page_alloc: Simplify locking during free_unref_page_list
>
> While freeing a large list, the zone lock will be released and reacquired
> to avoid long hold times since commit c24ad77d962c ("mm/page_alloc.c: avoid
> excessive IRQ disabled times in free_unref_page_list()"). As suggested
> by Vlastimil Babka, the lockrelease/reacquire logic can be simplified by
> reusing the logic that acquires a different lock when changing zones.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>

> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 25 +++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 445066617204..08e32daf0918 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3518,13 +3518,19 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> list_del(&page->lru);
> migratetype = get_pcppage_migratetype(page);
>
> - /* Different zone, different pcp lock. */
> - if (zone != locked_zone) {
> + /*
> + * Either different zone requiring a different pcp lock or
> + * excessive lock hold times when freeing a large list of
> + * pages.
> + */
> + if (zone != locked_zone || batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
> if (pcp) {
> pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
> pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> }
>
> + batch_count = 0;
> +
> /*
> * trylock is necessary as pages may be getting freed
> * from IRQ or SoftIRQ context after an IO completion.
> @@ -3539,7 +3545,6 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
> continue;
> }
> locked_zone = zone;
> - batch_count = 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -3551,19 +3556,7 @@ void free_unref_page_list(struct list_head *list)
>
> trace_mm_page_free_batched(page);
> free_unref_page_commit(zone, pcp, page, migratetype, 0);
> -
> - /*
> - * Guard against excessive lock hold times when freeing
> - * a large list of pages. Lock will be reacquired if
> - * necessary on the next iteration.
> - */
> - if (++batch_count == SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX) {
> - pcp_spin_unlock(pcp);
> - pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags);
> - batch_count = 0;
> - pcp = NULL;
> - locked_zone = NULL;
> - }
> + batch_count++;
> }
>
> if (pcp) {