> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 04:44:41PM +0530, Alok Chauhan wrote:
>>
> + /*
> + * In NACK error condition resetting of I2C controller happens
> + * before STOP condition is properly completed by I2C controller,
> + * so wait for 2 clock cycle to complete STOP condition.
> + */
> + if (i2c_dev->msg_err == I2C_ERR_NO_ACK)
> + udelay(DIV_ROUND_UP(2 * 1000000, i2c_dev->bus_clk_rate));
> +
>Is a delay here good, would it be better to sleep so that some other process can gain cpu time?
>>We mostly used 100 khz i2c clock frequency and delay in that case will be 20 usec. Would it be ok to sleep for such a smaller time? Won't it increase any other overhead?
Please let me know if sleep is better option here instead of waiting.
Thanks
Alok