On 2/16/22 5:32 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Xinlei Lee <[email protected]>
>
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1.
> 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt.
> 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers.
> 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties.
> 5. Make dt_checking successful.
>
> Xinlei Lee (4):
> dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
> format
> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8192
> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8195
> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186
>
> .../bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt | 44 -----------
> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt
>
Why did you drop [PATCH] tag in the subject of your patch series?
Please keep it for distinguishing it from RFC/RESEND and other
meaningful tags next time.
Thanks
Macpaul Lin
On 16/02/2022 10:47, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>
>
> On 2/16/22 5:32 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> From: Xinlei Lee <[email protected]>
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1.
>> 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt.
>> 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers.
>> 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties.
>> 5. Make dt_checking successful.
>>
>> Xinlei Lee (4):
>> dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>> format
>> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8192
>> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8195
>> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186
>>
>> .../bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt | 44 -----------
>> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100755 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt
>>
>
> Why did you drop [PATCH] tag in the subject of your patch series?
> Please keep it for distinguishing it from RFC/RESEND and other
> meaningful tags next time.
I also asked for this in v1 patchset, so it's a pity my suggestion was
not listened to.
Best regards,
Krzysztof