According to Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst ENOTSUPP is
not recommended and EOPNOTSUPP should be used instead.
Signed-off-by: Sean Young <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/pwm.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index b64b8a82415c..c9cb87b59ac8 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -407,12 +407,12 @@ static inline int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm,
const struct pwm_state *state)
{
might_sleep();
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static inline int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm)
{
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
static inline int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns,
--
2.43.0
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 04:30:25PM +0000, Sean Young wrote:
> According to Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst ENOTSUPP is
> not recommended and EOPNOTSUPP should be used instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <[email protected]>
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |