2020-06-09 15:57:30

by Dennis Dalessandro

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] drivers: infiniband: Fix trivial spelling

On 6/9/2020 8:46 AM, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> The word 'descriptor' is misspelled throughout the tree.
>
> Fix it up accordingly:
> decriptors -> descriptors
>
> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
> index 883cb9d48022..175290c56db9 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static struct ipoib_txreq *hfi1_ipoib_send_dma_common(struct net_device *dev,
> if (unlikely(!tx))
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - /* so that we can test if the sdma decriptors are there */
> + /* so that we can test if the sdma descriptors are there */
> tx->txreq.num_desc = 0;
> tx->priv = priv;
> tx->txq = txp->txq;
>

Thanks

Acked-by: Dennis Dalessandro <[email protected]>


2020-06-09 16:09:49

by Kieran Bingham

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] drivers: infiniband: Fix trivial spelling

Ooops,

Looks like that should have been part of patch 2/17.

Must have got split during the rebase I made or something, not sure.

On 09/06/2020 16:54, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> On 6/9/2020 8:46 AM, Kieran Bingham wrote:
>> The word 'descriptor' is misspelled throughout the tree.
>>
>> Fix it up accordingly:
>>      decriptors -> descriptors
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
>> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
>> index 883cb9d48022..175290c56db9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
>> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static struct ipoib_txreq
>> *hfi1_ipoib_send_dma_common(struct net_device *dev,
>>       if (unlikely(!tx))
>>           return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>   -    /* so that we can test if the sdma decriptors are there */
>> +    /* so that we can test if the sdma descriptors are there */
>>       tx->txreq.num_desc = 0;
>>       tx->priv = priv;
>>       tx->txq = txp->txq;
>>
>
> Thanks
>
> Acked-by: Dennis Dalessandro <[email protected]>

Thanks.

Kieran