2022-05-16 16:03:22

by Feng Zhou

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase

From: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>

comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/

use /* */ instead of //
use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
use 8 bytes for value size
fix memory leak
use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU

Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 49 +++++++++------
.../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 61 ++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
@@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */

#include <test_progs.h>

#include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"

-#define TEST_VALUE 1
-
void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
{
struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
- int key = 0, ret;
- int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
- int *buf;
+ __u64 key = 0, sum;
+ int ret, i;
+ int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
+ __u64 *buf;

- buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
+ buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
return;
- memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
- buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;

- skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
- if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
- return;
+ for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
+ buf[i] = i;
+ sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
+
+ skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
+ goto exit;
+
+ skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
+
+ ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
- ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
+ goto cleanup;

ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key, buf, 0);
ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
@@ -37,10 +46,14 @@ void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)

syscall(__NR_getuid);

- ret = skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
- skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
- skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE;
- ASSERT_OK(!ret, "bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem success");
+ test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__detach(skel);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_array lookup percpu elem");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_hash lookup percpu elem");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_lru_hash lookup percpu elem");

+cleanup:
test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__destroy(skel);
+exit:
+ free(buf);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
index 5d4ef86cbf48..75479180571f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
@@ -1,52 +1,69 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */

#include "vmlinux.h"
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>

-int percpu_array_elem_val = 0;
-int percpu_hash_elem_val = 0;
-int percpu_lru_hash_elem_val = 0;
+__u64 percpu_array_elem_sum = 0;
+__u64 percpu_hash_elem_sum = 0;
+__u64 percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum = 0;
+const volatile int nr_cpus;

struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
__uint(max_entries, 1);
__type(key, __u32);
- __type(value, __u32);
+ __type(value, __u64);
} percpu_array_map SEC(".maps");

struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH);
__uint(max_entries, 1);
- __type(key, __u32);
- __type(value, __u32);
+ __type(key, __u64);
+ __type(value, __u64);
} percpu_hash_map SEC(".maps");

struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH);
__uint(max_entries, 1);
- __type(key, __u32);
- __type(value, __u32);
+ __type(key, __u64);
+ __type(value, __u64);
} percpu_lru_hash_map SEC(".maps");

+struct read_percpu_elem_ctx {
+ void *map;
+ __u64 sum;
+};
+
+static int read_percpu_elem_callback(__u32 index, struct read_percpu_elem_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ __u64 key = 0;
+ __u64 *value;
+ value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(ctx->map, &key, index);
+ if (value)
+ ctx->sum += *value;
+ return 0;
+}
+
SEC("tp/syscalls/sys_enter_getuid")
int sysenter_getuid(const void *ctx)
{
- __u32 key = 0;
- __u32 cpu = 0;
- __u32 *value;
+ struct read_percpu_elem_ctx map_ctx;

- value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(&percpu_array_map, &key, cpu);
- if (value)
- percpu_array_elem_val = *value;
+ map_ctx.map = &percpu_array_map;
+ map_ctx.sum = 0;
+ bpf_loop(nr_cpus, read_percpu_elem_callback, &map_ctx, 0);
+ percpu_array_elem_sum = map_ctx.sum;

- value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(&percpu_hash_map, &key, cpu);
- if (value)
- percpu_hash_elem_val = *value;
+ map_ctx.map = &percpu_hash_map;
+ map_ctx.sum = 0;
+ bpf_loop(nr_cpus, read_percpu_elem_callback, &map_ctx, 0);
+ percpu_hash_elem_sum = map_ctx.sum;

- value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(&percpu_lru_hash_map, &key, cpu);
- if (value)
- percpu_lru_hash_elem_val = *value;
+ map_ctx.map = &percpu_lru_hash_map;
+ map_ctx.sum = 0;
+ bpf_loop(nr_cpus, read_percpu_elem_callback, &map_ctx, 0);
+ percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum = map_ctx.sum;

return 0;
}
--
2.20.1



2022-05-17 11:18:21

by Yonghong Song

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase



On 5/15/22 7:24 PM, Feng zhou wrote:
> From: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
>
> comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/
>
> use /* */ instead of //
> use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
> use 8 bytes for value size
> fix memory leak
> use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
> add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
>
> Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>

LGTM with a few nits below.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

> ---
> .../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 49 +++++++++------
> .../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 61 ++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> @@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
>
> #include <test_progs.h>
>

The above empty line is unnecessary.

> #include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
>
> -#define TEST_VALUE 1
> -
> void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
> {
> struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
> - int key = 0, ret;
> - int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
> - int *buf;
> + __u64 key = 0, sum;
> + int ret, i;
> + int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
> + __u64 *buf;
>
> - buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
> + buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
> if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
> return;
> - memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
> - buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
>
> - skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
> - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
> - return;
> + for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
> + buf[i] = i;
> + sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
> +
> + skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
> + goto exit;
> +
> + skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
> +
> + ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
> - ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
> + goto cleanup;
>
> ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key, buf, 0);
> ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
> @@ -37,10 +46,14 @@ void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
>
> syscall(__NR_getuid);
>
> - ret = skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
> - skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
> - skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE;
> - ASSERT_OK(!ret, "bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem success");
> + test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__detach(skel);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_array lookup percpu elem");
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_hash lookup percpu elem");
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_lru_hash lookup percpu elem");
>
> +cleanup:
> test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__destroy(skel);
> +exit:
> + free(buf);
> }
[...]
> +struct read_percpu_elem_ctx {
> + void *map;
> + __u64 sum;
> +};
> +
> +static int read_percpu_elem_callback(__u32 index, struct read_percpu_elem_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + __u64 key = 0;
> + __u64 *value;

Please add an empty line here.

> + value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(ctx->map, &key, index);
> + if (value)
> + ctx->sum += *value;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
[...]

2022-05-17 15:43:21

by Feng Zhou

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase

在 2022/5/17 上午11:09, Yonghong Song 写道:
>
>
> On 5/15/22 7:24 PM, Feng zhou wrote:
>> From: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
>>
>> comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/
>>
>>
>> use /* */ instead of //
>> use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
>> use 8 bytes for value size
>> fix memory leak
>> use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
>> add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
>>
>> Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add
>> test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
>> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
>
> LGTM with a few nits below.
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
>
Ok, will do. Thanks.

>> ---
>>   .../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c   | 49 +++++++++------
>>   .../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c   | 61 ++++++++++++-------
>>   2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>> index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>> @@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
>> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> -// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
>>     #include <test_progs.h>
>
> The above empty line is unnecessary.
>
>>   #include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
>>   -#define TEST_VALUE  1
>> -
>>   void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
>>   {
>>       struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
>> -    int key = 0, ret;
>> -    int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
>> -    int *buf;
>> +    __u64 key = 0, sum;
>> +    int ret, i;
>> +    int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
>> +    __u64 *buf;
>>   -    buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
>> +    buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
>>       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
>>           return;
>> -    memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
>> -    buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
>>   -    skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
>> -    if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel,
>> "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
>> -        return;
>> +    for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
>> +        buf[i] = i;
>> +    sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
>> +
>> +    skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
>> +    if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
>> +        goto exit;
>> +
>> +    skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
>> +
>> +    ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
>> +    if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
>> +        goto cleanup;
>> +
>>       ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
>> -    ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
>> +    if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
>> +        goto cleanup;
>>         ret =
>> bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key,
>> buf, 0);
>>       ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
>> @@ -37,10 +46,14 @@ void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
>>         syscall(__NR_getuid);
>>   -    ret = skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
>> -          skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE &&
>> -          skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_val == TEST_VALUE;
>> -    ASSERT_OK(!ret, "bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem success");
>> +    test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__detach(skel);
>> +
>> +    ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_array_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_array
>> lookup percpu elem");
>> +    ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_hash_elem_sum, sum, "percpu_hash
>> lookup percpu elem");
>> +    ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_lru_hash_elem_sum, sum,
>> "percpu_lru_hash lookup percpu elem");
>>   +cleanup:
>>       test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__destroy(skel);
>> +exit:
>> +    free(buf);
>>   }
> [...]
>> +struct read_percpu_elem_ctx {
>> +    void *map;
>> +    __u64 sum;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int read_percpu_elem_callback(__u32 index, struct
>> read_percpu_elem_ctx *ctx)
>> +{
>> +    __u64 key = 0;
>> +    __u64 *value;
>
> Please add an empty line here.
>
>> +    value = bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem(ctx->map, &key, index);
>> +    if (value)
>> +        ctx->sum += *value;
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
> [...]



2022-05-19 05:45:58

by Andrii Nakryiko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase

On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 7:25 PM Feng zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
>
> comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/
>
> use /* */ instead of //
> use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
> use 8 bytes for value size
> fix memory leak
> use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
> add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
>
> Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 49 +++++++++------
> .../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 61 ++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> @@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */

heh, so for SPDX license comment the rule is to use // in .c files :)
so keep SPDX as // and all others as /* */

> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
>
> #include <test_progs.h>
>
> #include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
>
> -#define TEST_VALUE 1
> -
> void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
> {
> struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
> - int key = 0, ret;
> - int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
> - int *buf;
> + __u64 key = 0, sum;
> + int ret, i;
> + int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
> + __u64 *buf;
>
> - buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
> + buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));

no need for casting

> if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
> return;
> - memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
> - buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
>
> - skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
> - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
> - return;
> + for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)

spaces between operators

> + buf[i] = i;
> + sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;

same, please follow kernel code style

> +
> + skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
> + goto exit;
> +

nit: keep it simple, init skel to NULL and use single cleanup goto
label that will destroy skel unconditionally (it deals with NULL just
fine)

> + skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
> +
> + ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
> - ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
> + goto cleanup;
>
> ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key, buf, 0);
> ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");

[...]

2022-05-19 07:34:30

by Feng Zhou

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase

在 2022/5/19 上午8:17, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 7:25 PM Feng zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
>>
>> comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/
>>
>> use /* */ instead of //
>> use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
>> use 8 bytes for value size
>> fix memory leak
>> use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
>> add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
>>
>> Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
>> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> .../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 49 +++++++++------
>> .../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 61 ++++++++++++-------
>> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>> index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>> @@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
>> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> -// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> heh, so for SPDX license comment the rule is to use // in .c files :)
> so keep SPDX as // and all others as /* */

will do. Thanks.

>
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
>>
>> #include <test_progs.h>
>>
>> #include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
>>
>> -#define TEST_VALUE 1
>> -
>> void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
>> {
>> struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
>> - int key = 0, ret;
>> - int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
>> - int *buf;
>> + __u64 key = 0, sum;
>> + int ret, i;
>> + int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
>> + __u64 *buf;
>>
>> - buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
>> + buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
> no need for casting

casting means no '(__u64 *)'?
just like this:
'buf = malloc(nr_cpus * sizeof(__u64));'

>
>> if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
>> return;
>> - memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
>> - buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
>>
>> - skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
>> - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
>> - return;
>> + for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
> spaces between operators

will do. Thanks.

>
>> + buf[i] = i;
>> + sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
> same, please follow kernel code style

will do. Thanks.

>
>> +
>> + skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
>> + goto exit;
>> +
> nit: keep it simple, init skel to NULL and use single cleanup goto
> label that will destroy skel unconditionally (it deals with NULL just
> fine)

will do. Thanks.

>> + skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
>> +
>> + ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
>> + goto cleanup;
>> +
>> ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
>> - ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
>> + goto cleanup;
>>
>> ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key, buf, 0);
>> ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
> [...]



2022-05-19 07:58:41

by Andrii Nakryiko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 8:27 PM Feng Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 在 2022/5/19 上午8:17, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> > On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 7:25 PM Feng zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> From: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/
> >>
> >> use /* */ instead of //
> >> use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
> >> use 8 bytes for value size
> >> fix memory leak
> >> use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
> >> add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
> >>
> >> Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
> >> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> .../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 49 +++++++++------
> >> .../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 61 ++++++++++++-------
> >> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> >> index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
> >> @@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
> >> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> -// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
> >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > heh, so for SPDX license comment the rule is to use // in .c files :)
> > so keep SPDX as // and all others as /* */
>
> will do. Thanks.
>
> >
> >> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
> >>
> >> #include <test_progs.h>
> >>
> >> #include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
> >>
> >> -#define TEST_VALUE 1
> >> -
> >> void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
> >> {
> >> struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
> >> - int key = 0, ret;
> >> - int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
> >> - int *buf;
> >> + __u64 key = 0, sum;
> >> + int ret, i;
> >> + int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
> >> + __u64 *buf;
> >>
> >> - buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
> >> + buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
> > no need for casting
>
> casting means no '(__u64 *)'?
> just like this:
> 'buf = malloc(nr_cpus * sizeof(__u64));'
>

yes, in C you don't need to explicitly cast void * to other pointer types

> >
> >> if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
> >> return;
> >> - memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
> >> - buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
> >>
> >> - skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
> >> - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
> >> - return;
> >> + for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
> > spaces between operators
>
> will do. Thanks.
>
> >
> >> + buf[i] = i;
> >> + sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
> > same, please follow kernel code style
>
> will do. Thanks.
>
> >
> >> +
> >> + skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
> >> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
> >> + goto exit;
> >> +
> > nit: keep it simple, init skel to NULL and use single cleanup goto
> > label that will destroy skel unconditionally (it deals with NULL just
> > fine)
>
> will do. Thanks.
>
> >> + skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
> >> +
> >> + ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
> >> + if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
> >> + goto cleanup;
> >> +
> >> ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
> >> - ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
> >> + if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
> >> + goto cleanup;
> >>
> >> ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key, buf, 0);
> >> ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
> > [...]
>
>

2022-05-19 15:00:05

by Feng Zhou

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix some bugs in map_lookup_percpu_elem testcase

在 2022/5/19 下午12:38, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 8:27 PM Feng Zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 在 2022/5/19 上午8:17, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
>>> On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 7:25 PM Feng zhou <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> From: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> comments from Andrii Nakryiko, details in here:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/T/
>>>>
>>>> use /* */ instead of //
>>>> use libbpf_num_possible_cpus() instead of sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
>>>> use 8 bytes for value size
>>>> fix memory leak
>>>> use ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_OK
>>>> add bpf_loop to fetch values on each possible CPU
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: ed7c13776e20c74486b0939a3c1de984c5efb6aa ("selftests/bpf: add test case for bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 49 +++++++++------
>>>> .../bpf/progs/test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.c | 61 ++++++++++++-------
>>>> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>>>> index 58b24c2112b0..89ca170f1c25 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_lookup_percpu_elem.c
>>>> @@ -1,30 +1,39 @@
>>>> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> -// Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance
>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> heh, so for SPDX license comment the rule is to use // in .c files :)
>>> so keep SPDX as // and all others as /* */
>> will do. Thanks.
>>
>>>> +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */
>>>>
>>>> #include <test_progs.h>
>>>>
>>>> #include "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem.skel.h"
>>>>
>>>> -#define TEST_VALUE 1
>>>> -
>>>> void test_map_lookup_percpu_elem(void)
>>>> {
>>>> struct test_map_lookup_percpu_elem *skel;
>>>> - int key = 0, ret;
>>>> - int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
>>>> - int *buf;
>>>> + __u64 key = 0, sum;
>>>> + int ret, i;
>>>> + int nr_cpus = libbpf_num_possible_cpus();
>>>> + __u64 *buf;
>>>>
>>>> - buf = (int *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
>>>> + buf = (__u64 *)malloc(nr_cpus*sizeof(__u64));
>>> no need for casting
>> casting means no '(__u64 *)'?
>> just like this:
>> 'buf = malloc(nr_cpus * sizeof(__u64));'
>>
> yes, in C you don't need to explicitly cast void * to other pointer types

Ok, Thanks.

>
>>>> if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
>>>> return;
>>>> - memset(buf, 0, nr_cpus*sizeof(int));
>>>> - buf[0] = TEST_VALUE;
>>>>
>>>> - skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load();
>>>> - if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open_and_load"))
>>>> - return;
>>>> + for (i=0; i<nr_cpus; i++)
>>> spaces between operators
>> will do. Thanks.
>>
>>>> + buf[i] = i;
>>>> + sum = (nr_cpus-1)*nr_cpus/2;
>>> same, please follow kernel code style
>> will do. Thanks.
>>
>>>> +
>>>> + skel = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open();
>>>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__open"))
>>>> + goto exit;
>>>> +
>>> nit: keep it simple, init skel to NULL and use single cleanup goto
>>> label that will destroy skel unconditionally (it deals with NULL just
>>> fine)
>> will do. Thanks.
>>
>>>> + skel->rodata->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load(skel);
>>>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__load"))
>>>> + goto cleanup;
>>>> +
>>>> ret = test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach(skel);
>>>> - ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach");
>>>> + if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_map_lookup_percpu_elem__attach"))
>>>> + goto cleanup;
>>>>
>>>> ret = bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.percpu_array_map), &key, buf, 0);
>>>> ASSERT_OK(ret, "percpu_array_map update");
>>> [...]
>>