On 06.07.23 11:49, Nanyong Sun wrote:
> Since the ksm_merging_pages information already included in
> /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat, we could remove /proc/<pid>/ksm_merging_pages
> to make the directory more clean, and can save a little bit resources.
>
> To delete this interface more smoothly and avoid userspace break,
> retain this interface temporarily and modify its function to hint
> users to use ksm_stat instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nanyong Sun <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/proc/base.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index eb2e498e3b8d..d080c58cbe6c 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -3189,14 +3189,7 @@ static int proc_pid_patch_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> static int proc_pid_ksm_merging_pages(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
> {
> - struct mm_struct *mm;
> -
> - mm = get_task_mm(task);
> - if (mm) {
> - seq_printf(m, "%lu\n", mm->ksm_merging_pages);
> - mmput(mm);
> - }
> -
> + seq_puts(m, "please use /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat instead\n");
> return 0;
> }
> static int proc_pid_ksm_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
Why do we care so much about removing 15 simple LOC? That change here
will already mess with user space.
Sorry, but IMHO it's all not worth the churn.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
On 2023/7/6 16:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 06.07.23 11:49, Nanyong Sun wrote:
>> Since the ksm_merging_pages information already included in
>> /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat, we could remove /proc/<pid>/ksm_merging_pages
>> to make the directory more clean, and can save a little bit resources.
>>
>> To delete this interface more smoothly and avoid userspace break,
>> retain this interface temporarily and modify its function to hint
>> users to use ksm_stat instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nanyong Sun <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/proc/base.c | 9 +--------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
>> index eb2e498e3b8d..d080c58cbe6c 100644
>> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
>> @@ -3189,14 +3189,7 @@ static int proc_pid_patch_state(struct
>> seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
>> static int proc_pid_ksm_merging_pages(struct seq_file *m, struct
>> pid_namespace *ns,
>> struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
>> {
>> - struct mm_struct *mm;
>> -
>> - mm = get_task_mm(task);
>> - if (mm) {
>> - seq_printf(m, "%lu\n", mm->ksm_merging_pages);
>> - mmput(mm);
>> - }
>> -
>> + seq_puts(m, "please use /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat instead\n");
>> return 0;
>> }
>> static int proc_pid_ksm_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct
>> pid_namespace *ns,
>
>
> Why do we care so much about removing 15 simple LOC? That change here
> will already mess with user space.
>
> Sorry, but IMHO it's all not worth the churn.
>
We do not pay attention to these 15 LOC. We pay more attention to the
redundant interface under procfs.
This interface is used by developers and has a short history. Therefore,
changing it now has no big impact.