2019-03-31 05:33:58

by Fuqian Huang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] tty: rocket: Fix a kernel address leak in rp_ioctl

If the cmd is RCPK_GET_STRUCT, copy_to_user will copy
info to user space. As info->port.ops is the address of
a constant object rocket_port_ops (assigned in init_r_port),
a kernel address leakage happens.

This patch sets all the pointer fields to NULL before copy the
object to user space to avoid kernel address leakage.

Signed-off-by: Fuqian Huang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/tty/rocket.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/rocket.c b/drivers/tty/rocket.c
index b121d8f8f3d7..a7bcf44b61bd 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/rocket.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/rocket.c
@@ -1271,6 +1271,34 @@ static int get_version(struct r_port *info, struct rocket_version __user *retver
return 0;
}

+static int get_struct(struct r_port *info, void *argp)
+{
+ struct r_port *new;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ new = kzalloc(sizeof (struct r_port), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!new)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ memcpy(new, info, sizeof (struct r_port));
+ new->port.tty = NULL;
+ new->port.itty = NULL;
+ new->port.ops = NULL;
+ new->port.client_ops = NULL;
+ memset(&new->port.open_wait.head, 0, sizeof (struct list_head));
+ memset(&new->port.delta_msr_wait.head, 0, sizeof (struct list_head));
+ memset(&new->port.mutex.wait_list, 0, sizeof (struct list_head));
+ memset(&new->port.buf_mutex.wait_list, 0, sizeof (struct list_head));
+ new->port.xmit_buf = NULL;
+ new->port.client_data = NULL;
+ new->ctlp = NULL;
+ new->xmit_buf = NULL;
+ memset(&new->write_mtx.wait_list, 0, sizeof (struct list_head));
+ if (copy_to_user(argp, new, sizeof (struct r_port)))
+ ret = -EFAULT;
+ kfree(new);
+ return ret;
+}
+
/* IOCTL call handler into the driver */
static int rp_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty,
unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
@@ -1284,8 +1312,7 @@ static int rp_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty,

switch (cmd) {
case RCKP_GET_STRUCT:
- if (copy_to_user(argp, info, sizeof (struct r_port)))
- ret = -EFAULT;
+ ret = get_struct(info, argp);
break;
case RCKP_GET_CONFIG:
ret = get_config(info, argp);
--
2.11.0



2019-03-31 08:10:43

by Mukesh Ojha

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: rocket: Fix a kernel address leak in rp_ioctl


On 3/31/2019 11:02 AM, Fuqian Huang wrote:
> If the cmd is RCPK_GET_STRUCT, copy_to_user will copy
> info to user space. As info->port.ops is the address of
> a constant object rocket_port_ops (assigned in init_r_port),
> a kernel address leakage happens.
>
> This patch sets all the pointer fields to NULL before copy the
> object to user space to avoid kernel address leakage.


Should not this be done like provide userspace the stuff they want?

>
> Signed-off-by: Fuqian Huang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/tty/rocket.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/rocket.c b/drivers/tty/rocket.c
> index b121d8f8f3d7..a7bcf44b61bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/rocket.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/rocket.c
> @@ -1271,6 +1271,34 @@ static int get_version(struct r_port *info, struct rocket_version __user *retver
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int get_struct(struct r_port *info, void *argp)
Should not this void * argp be struct r_port __user ?
> +{
> + struct r_port *new;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + new = kzalloc(sizeof (struct r_port), GFP_KERNEL)

why there is space before sizeof everywhere ?

> ;
> + if (!new)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + memcpy(new, info, sizeof (struct r_port));
> + new->port.tty = NULL;
> + new->port.itty = NULL;
> + new->port.ops = NULL;
> + new->port.client_ops = NULL;
> + memset(&new->port.open_wait.head, 0, sizeof (struct list_head));
> + memset(&new->port.delta_msr_wait.head, 0, sizeof (struct list_head));
> + memset(&new->port.mutex.wait_list, 0, sizeof (struct list_head));
> + memset(&new->port.buf_mutex.wait_list, 0, sizeof (struct list_head));
> + new->port.xmit_buf = NULL;
> + new->port.client_data = NULL;
> + new->ctlp = NULL;
> + new->xmit_buf = NULL;
> + memset(&new->write_mtx.wait_list, 0, sizeof (struct list_head));

Are we sure nothing is missed ?

Are the other information use by userspace ?


> + if (copy_to_user(argp, new, sizeof (struct r_port)))
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + kfree(new);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /* IOCTL call handler into the driver */
> static int rp_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty,
> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> @@ -1284,8 +1312,7 @@ static int rp_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty,
>
> switch (cmd) {
> case RCKP_GET_STRUCT:
> - if (copy_to_user(argp, info, sizeof (struct r_port)))
> - ret = -EFAULT;
> + ret = get_struct(info, argp);
> break;
> case RCKP_GET_CONFIG:
> ret = get_config(info, argp);