Hi, Russ,
> After thinking about this, if a new runtime call was added to
> efi_runtime_services_t, then the existing efi_call_virt<n> could be
> used. This would remove the need to create uv_systab. I'll post
> a patch shortly.
Please don't touch efi_runtime_services_t, if you do not go through
UEFI standard procedure. It can not be extended in a non-standard way.
Thinking about someone else adds another new field to
efi_runtime_services_t in a conflict way.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying