On 11/08/2023 12:12, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> They do the same thing, except v3 and earlier are expected to have the
> old style of bindings (i.e. core clock per core under video-enc/decoder
> subnode).
>
> Unify them to stop duplicating needlessly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c | 34 ++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
> index 48c9084bb4db..83d1e68bb9ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
> @@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ static int core_get_v1(struct venus_core *core)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + legacy_binding = true;
> +
> ret = core_clks_get(core);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -349,6 +351,9 @@ static int vdec_get_v3(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> + if (!legacy_binding)
> + return 0;
> +
> return vcodec_clks_get(core, dev, core->vcodec0_clks,
> core->res->vcodec0_clks);
> }
> @@ -374,6 +379,9 @@ static int venc_get_v3(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> + if (!legacy_binding)
> + return 0;
> +
> return vcodec_clks_get(core, dev, core->vcodec1_clks,
> core->res->vcodec1_clks);
> }
> @@ -764,17 +772,6 @@ static int coreid_power_v4(struct venus_inst *inst, int on)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int vdec_get_v4(struct device *dev)
> -{
> - struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -
> - if (!legacy_binding)
> - return 0;
> -
> - return vcodec_clks_get(core, dev, core->vcodec0_clks,
> - core->res->vcodec0_clks);
> -}
> -
> static void vdec_put_v4(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -809,17 +806,6 @@ static int vdec_power_v4(struct device *dev, int on)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int venc_get_v4(struct device *dev)
> -{
> - struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -
> - if (!legacy_binding)
> - return 0;
> -
> - return vcodec_clks_get(core, dev, core->vcodec1_clks,
> - core->res->vcodec1_clks);
> -}
> -
> static void venc_put_v4(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -1180,10 +1166,10 @@ static const struct venus_pm_ops pm_ops_v4 = {
> .core_get = core_get_v4,
> .core_put = core_put_v4,
> .core_power = core_power_v4,
> - .vdec_get = vdec_get_v4,
> + .vdec_get = vdec_get_v3,
> .vdec_put = vdec_put_v4,
> .vdec_power = vdec_power_v4,
> - .venc_get = venc_get_v4,
> + .venc_get = venc_get_v3,
> .venc_put = venc_put_v4,
> .venc_power = venc_power_v4,
> .coreid_power = coreid_power_v4,
>
> ---
> base-commit: 21ef7b1e17d039053edaeaf41142423810572741
> change-id: 20230811-topic-venus_dedup-08f183d3a611
>
> Best regards,
This makes sense.
It'd be nice to get rid of the top-level static bool and bury it in the
core venus structure but, that's not a problem with your patch.
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <[email protected]>
On 11.08.2023 13:52, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 11/08/2023 12:12, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> They do the same thing, except v3 and earlier are expected to have the
>> old style of bindings (i.e. core clock per core under video-enc/decoder
>> subnode).
>>
>> Unify them to stop duplicating needlessly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c | 34 ++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
>> index 48c9084bb4db..83d1e68bb9ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
>> @@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ static int core_get_v1(struct venus_core *core)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> + legacy_binding = true;
>> +
>> ret = core_clks_get(core);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> @@ -349,6 +351,9 @@ static int vdec_get_v3(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + if (!legacy_binding)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> return vcodec_clks_get(core, dev, core->vcodec0_clks,
>> core->res->vcodec0_clks);
>> }
>> @@ -374,6 +379,9 @@ static int venc_get_v3(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + if (!legacy_binding)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> return vcodec_clks_get(core, dev, core->vcodec1_clks,
>> core->res->vcodec1_clks);
>> }
>> @@ -764,17 +772,6 @@ static int coreid_power_v4(struct venus_inst *inst, int on)
>> return ret;
>> }
>> -static int vdec_get_v4(struct device *dev)
>> -{
>> - struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> -
>> - if (!legacy_binding)
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> - return vcodec_clks_get(core, dev, core->vcodec0_clks,
>> - core->res->vcodec0_clks);
>> -}
>> -
>> static void vdec_put_v4(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> @@ -809,17 +806,6 @@ static int vdec_power_v4(struct device *dev, int on)
>> return ret;
>> }
>> -static int venc_get_v4(struct device *dev)
>> -{
>> - struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> -
>> - if (!legacy_binding)
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> - return vcodec_clks_get(core, dev, core->vcodec1_clks,
>> - core->res->vcodec1_clks);
>> -}
>> -
>> static void venc_put_v4(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> @@ -1180,10 +1166,10 @@ static const struct venus_pm_ops pm_ops_v4 = {
>> .core_get = core_get_v4,
>> .core_put = core_put_v4,
>> .core_power = core_power_v4,
>> - .vdec_get = vdec_get_v4,
>> + .vdec_get = vdec_get_v3,
>> .vdec_put = vdec_put_v4,
>> .vdec_power = vdec_power_v4,
>> - .venc_get = venc_get_v4,
>> + .venc_get = venc_get_v3,
>> .venc_put = venc_put_v4,
>> .venc_power = venc_power_v4,
>> .coreid_power = coreid_power_v4,
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 21ef7b1e17d039053edaeaf41142423810572741
>> change-id: 20230811-topic-venus_dedup-08f183d3a611
>>
>> Best regards,
>
> This makes sense.
>
> It'd be nice to get rid of the top-level static bool and bury it in the core venus structure but, that's not a problem with your patch.
That's the plan, just that untangling this mess will take some time
Konrad