Please check the patch.
"Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]> writes:
> Please check the patch.
YH. Please place a newline between your subject and your description
in the body of your patches.
> [PATCH] x86_64: interrupt array size should be aligned to NR_VECTORS
>
> interrupt array is referred for idt vectors instead of NR_IRQS, so change size
> to NR_VECTORS - FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR. Also change to static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eric Biederman <[email protected]>
Yep I missed this optimization opportunity :)
Eric
On 11/24/06, Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]> writes:
> YH. Please place a newline between your subject and your description
> in the body of your patches.
Next time.
> Yep I missed this optimization opportunity :)
You did a great job to clean up the irq_vector mapping.
YH
"Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]> writes:
> On 11/24/06, Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]> writes:
>> YH. Please place a newline between your subject and your description
>> in the body of your patches.
>
> Next time.
>
>> Yep I missed this optimization opportunity :)
>
> You did a great job to clean up the irq_vector mapping.
Yep and created many new optimization and clean up opportunities...
Because I didn't take everything to it's full logical conclusion :)
Just enough to make everything architecture specific.
Eric