2008-08-23 19:59:20

by David Witbrodt

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression



> please check v2.

Thanks Yinghai. This still applies to a different line number in
v2.6.27-rc4 than what the patch indicates. I also get a warning
about unused variable "i" (I commented it out in my previous fix,
but not this time).

At any rate, I still produces a kernel that hangs at the typical
location.


Dave W.


2008-08-23 20:51:49

by Yinghai Lu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression

On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:47 PM, David Witbrodt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> please check v2.
>
> Thanks Yinghai. This still applies to a different line number in
> v2.6.27-rc4 than what the patch indicates. I also get a warning
> about unused variable "i" (I commented it out in my previous fix,
> but not this time).
>
> At any rate, I still produces a kernel that hangs at the typical
> location.
>
David,

please check v3

deviceid should be 0x4385 instead.

YH


Attachments:
(No filename) (479.00 B)
hpet_in_bar1_v3.patch (1.32 kB)
Download all attachments

2008-08-23 20:12:26

by Yinghai Lu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression

On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:47 PM, David Witbrodt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> please check v2.
>
> Thanks Yinghai. This still applies to a different line number in
> v2.6.27-rc4 than what the patch indicates. I also get a warning
> about unused variable "i" (I commented it out in my previous fix,
> but not this time).
>
> At any rate, I still produces a kernel that hangs at the typical
> location.
>
dmesg and lspci -vvxxx with hpet=disable?

please boot with "debug initcall_debug hpet=disable"

YH