> please use split_e820_reserve_xx2.patch instead...
OK, that produces the same result: a happy kernel!
I compared the full 'dmesg' output from the previous build and the
current build using diff: the only differences were trivial --
return times from initcall functions, and the order in which some
initcalls were performed was different very late in the boot process.
Thanks Yinghai,
Dave W.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 6:25 PM, David Witbrodt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> please use split_e820_reserve_xx2.patch instead...
>
> OK, that produces the same result: a happy kernel!
>
> I compared the full 'dmesg' output from the previous build and the
> current build using diff: the only differences were trivial --
> return times from initcall functions, and the order in which some
> initcalls were performed was different very late in the boot process.
good, let wait for Ingo back to check the two patches too.
YH