2021-01-30 01:55:30

by André Almeida

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] docs: Make syscalls' helpers naming consistent

The documentation explains the need to create internal syscalls' helpers,
and that they should be called `kern_xyzzy()`. However, the comment at
include/linux/syscall.h says that they should be named as
`ksys_xyzzy()`, and so are all the helpers declared bellow it. Change the
documentation to reflect this.

Cc: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
Fixes: 819671ff849b ("syscalls: define and explain goal to not call syscalls in the kernel")
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst b/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
index a3ecb236576c..61bdaec188ea 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ table, but not from elsewhere in the kernel. If the syscall functionality is
useful to be used within the kernel, needs to be shared between an old and a
new syscall, or needs to be shared between a syscall and its compatibility
variant, it should be implemented by means of a "helper" function (such as
-``kern_xyzzy()``). This kernel function may then be called within the
+``ksys_xyzzy()``). This kernel function may then be called within the
syscall stub (``sys_xyzzy()``), the compatibility syscall stub
(``compat_sys_xyzzy()``), and/or other kernel code.

--
2.30.0


2021-01-30 09:10:57

by Dominik Brodowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: Make syscalls' helpers naming consistent

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:45:46PM -0300, Andr? Almeida wrote:
> The documentation explains the need to create internal syscalls' helpers,
> and that they should be called `kern_xyzzy()`. However, the comment at
> include/linux/syscall.h says that they should be named as
> `ksys_xyzzy()`, and so are all the helpers declared bellow it. Change the
> documentation to reflect this.
>
> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 819671ff849b ("syscalls: define and explain goal to not call syscalls in the kernel")
> Signed-off-by: Andr? Almeida <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Dominik

2021-02-04 21:52:02

by Jonathan Corbet

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: Make syscalls' helpers naming consistent

André Almeida <[email protected]> writes:

> The documentation explains the need to create internal syscalls' helpers,
> and that they should be called `kern_xyzzy()`. However, the comment at
> include/linux/syscall.h says that they should be named as
> `ksys_xyzzy()`, and so are all the helpers declared bellow it. Change the
> documentation to reflect this.
>
> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 819671ff849b ("syscalls: define and explain goal to not call syscalls in the kernel")
> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

I've applied both patches thanks (also did s/syscall.h/syscalls.h in the
above changelog).

jon