IMA allocates kernel virtual memory to carry forward the measurement
list, from the current kernel to the next kernel on kexec system call,
in ima_add_kexec_buffer() function. In error code paths this memory
is not freed resulting in memory leak.
Free the memory allocated for the IMA measurement list in
the error code paths in ima_add_kexec_buffer() function.
Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Tyler Hicks <[email protected]>
Fixes: 7b8589cc29e7 ("ima: on soft reboot, save the measurement list")
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
index 121de3e04af2..212145008a01 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
@@ -119,12 +119,14 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
if (ret) {
pr_err("Error passing over kexec measurement buffer.\n");
+ vfree(kexec_buffer);
return;
}
ret = arch_ima_add_kexec_buffer(image, kbuf.mem, kexec_segment_size);
if (ret) {
pr_err("Error passing over kexec measurement buffer.\n");
+ vfree(kexec_buffer);
return;
}
--
2.30.0
On 2021-01-21 09:30:02, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> IMA allocates kernel virtual memory to carry forward the measurement
> list, from the current kernel to the next kernel on kexec system call,
> in ima_add_kexec_buffer() function. In error code paths this memory
> is not freed resulting in memory leak.
>
> Free the memory allocated for the IMA measurement list in
> the error code paths in ima_add_kexec_buffer() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Tyler Hicks <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 7b8589cc29e7 ("ima: on soft reboot, save the measurement list")
Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <[email protected]>
Tyler
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> index 121de3e04af2..212145008a01 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> @@ -119,12 +119,14 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
> ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("Error passing over kexec measurement buffer.\n");
> + vfree(kexec_buffer);
> return;
> }
>
> ret = arch_ima_add_kexec_buffer(image, kbuf.mem, kexec_segment_size);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("Error passing over kexec measurement buffer.\n");
> + vfree(kexec_buffer);
> return;
> }
>
> --
> 2.30.0
>
Hi Lakshmi,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <[email protected]> writes:
> IMA allocates kernel virtual memory to carry forward the measurement
> list, from the current kernel to the next kernel on kexec system call,
> in ima_add_kexec_buffer() function. In error code paths this memory
> is not freed resulting in memory leak.
>
> Free the memory allocated for the IMA measurement list in
> the error code paths in ima_add_kexec_buffer() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Tyler Hicks <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 7b8589cc29e7 ("ima: on soft reboot, save the measurement list")
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> index 121de3e04af2..212145008a01 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> @@ -119,12 +119,14 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
> ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("Error passing over kexec measurement buffer.\n");
> + vfree(kexec_buffer);
> return;
> }
This is a good catch.
>
> ret = arch_ima_add_kexec_buffer(image, kbuf.mem, kexec_segment_size);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("Error passing over kexec measurement buffer.\n");
> + vfree(kexec_buffer);
> return;
> }
But this would cause problems, because the buffer is still there in the
kimage and would cause kimage_load_segment() to access invalid memory.
There's no function to undo a kexec_add_buffer() to avoid this problem,
so I'd suggest just accepting the leak in this case. Fortunately, the
current implementations of arch_ima_add_kexec_buffer() are very simple
and cannot fail, so this is a theoretical problem.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
On 1/22/21 2:30 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Hi Lakshmi,
>
> Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> IMA allocates kernel virtual memory to carry forward the measurement
>> list, from the current kernel to the next kernel on kexec system call,
>> in ima_add_kexec_buffer() function. In error code paths this memory
>> is not freed resulting in memory leak.
>>
>> Free the memory allocated for the IMA measurement list in
>> the error code paths in ima_add_kexec_buffer() function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <[email protected]>
>> Suggested-by: Tyler Hicks <[email protected]>
>> Fixes: 7b8589cc29e7 ("ima: on soft reboot, save the measurement list")
>> ---
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> index 121de3e04af2..212145008a01 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>> @@ -119,12 +119,14 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
>> ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
>> if (ret) {
>> pr_err("Error passing over kexec measurement buffer.\n");
>> + vfree(kexec_buffer);
>> return;
>> }
>
> This is a good catch.
Thanks.
>
>>
>> ret = arch_ima_add_kexec_buffer(image, kbuf.mem, kexec_segment_size);
>> if (ret) {
>> pr_err("Error passing over kexec measurement buffer.\n");
>> + vfree(kexec_buffer);
>> return;
>> }
>
> But this would cause problems, because the buffer is still there in the
> kimage and would cause kimage_load_segment() to access invalid memory.
>
> There's no function to undo a kexec_add_buffer() to avoid this problem,
> so I'd suggest just accepting the leak in this case. Fortunately, the
> current implementations of arch_ima_add_kexec_buffer() are very simple
> and cannot fail, so this is a theoretical problem.
>
Agreed. I'll post a new patch with the above change removed.
thanks,
-lakshmi