Thanks Rusty,
At Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:59:39 +1030,
Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> Hajime Tazaki <[email protected]> writes:
> > the issue here is the decision between 'no-ops' and
> > 'assert(false)' depends on the context. an auto-generated
> > mechanism needs some hand-written parameters I think.
>
> Yes, I used auto-generated (fprintf, abort) stubs for similar testing in
> pettycoin, where if it failed to link it would generate such stubs
> for undefined symbols.
>
> It's not a panacea, but it helps speed up rejiggin after code changes.
> Generating noop stubs can actually make that process slower, as you can
> get failures because you now need to do something in that stub.
is it the following ? it's really cool stuff !
https://github.com/rustyrussell/pettycoin/blob/master/test/mockup.sh
-- Hajime
Hajime Tazaki <[email protected]> writes:
> is it the following ? it's really cool stuff !
>
> https://github.com/rustyrussell/pettycoin/blob/master/test/mockup.sh
Yep. It's ugly, but it Works For Me(TM).
Cheers,
Rusty.