2023-09-01 14:09:32

by Björn Töpel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v4] riscv: add userland instruction dump to RISC-V splats

yunhui cui <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Björn,
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 9:33 PM Björn Töpel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Yunhui Cui <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > Add userland instruction dump and rename dump_kernel_instr()
>> > to dump_instr().
>> >
>> > An example:
>> > [ 0.822439] Freeing unused kernel image (initmem) memory: 6916K
>> > [ 0.823817] Run /init as init process
>> > [ 0.839411] init[1]: unhandled signal 4 code 0x1 at 0x000000000005be18 in bb[10000+5fb000]
>> > [ 0.840751] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.14.0-rc4-00049-gbd644290aa72-dirty #187
>> > [ 0.841373] Hardware name: , BIOS
>> > [ 0.841743] epc : 000000000005be18 ra : 0000000000079e74 sp : 0000003fffcafda0
>> > [ 0.842271] gp : ffffffff816e9dc8 tp : 0000000000000000 t0 : 0000000000000000
>> > [ 0.842947] t1 : 0000003fffc9fdf0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : 0000000000000000
>> > [ 0.843434] s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : 0000003fffca0190 a1 : 0000003fffcafe18
>> > [ 0.843891] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000
>> > [ 0.844357] a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000000000
>> > [ 0.844803] s2 : 0000000000000000 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : 0000000000000000
>> > [ 0.845253] s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 : 0000000000000000
>> > [ 0.845722] s8 : 0000000000000000 s9 : 0000000000000000 s10: 0000000000000000
>> > [ 0.846180] s11: 0000000000d144e0 t3 : 0000000000000000 t4 : 0000000000000000
>> > [ 0.846616] t5 : 0000000000000000 t6 : 0000000000000000
>> > [ 0.847204] status: 0000000200000020 badaddr: 00000000f0028053 cause: 0000000000000002
>> > [ 0.848219] Code: f06f ff5f 3823 fa11 0113 fb01 2e23 0201 0293 0000 (8053) f002
>> > [ 0.851016] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000004
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <[email protected]>
>>
>> Nice!
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
>
> When can this patch be applied to the linux-next branch?

It looks like you're getting a sparse warning on the patch [1], and
that's probably why it hasn't been considered. You need something like:

--
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
index 69b5d18b5ae9..c5364131b8bd 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ int show_unhandled_signals = 1;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(die_lock);

#define get_user_nofault(val, ptr) ({ \
- const typeof(val) *__gk_ptr = (ptr); \
+ const typeof(val) __user *__gk_ptr = (__force const typeof(val) __user *)(ptr); \
copy_from_user_nofault(&(val), __gk_ptr, sizeof(val));\
})
--

IDK, maybe it worth removing the define all together, and just open code
it.

When you're submitting patches, it's a good thing to track patchwork for
warnings/errors.


Björn

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/[email protected]/