It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
for presence of a property and nothing more.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
---
sound/ppc/tumbler.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/ppc/tumbler.c b/sound/ppc/tumbler.c
index f3f8ad7c3df8..6c882873b344 100644
--- a/sound/ppc/tumbler.c
+++ b/sound/ppc/tumbler.c
@@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ int snd_pmac_tumbler_init(struct snd_pmac *chip)
if (of_node_name_eq(np, "sound")) {
if (of_get_property(np, "has-anded-reset", NULL))
mix->anded_reset = 1;
- if (of_get_property(np, "layout-id", NULL))
+ if (of_property_present(np, "layout-id"))
mix->reset_on_sleep = 0;
of_node_put(np);
break;
--
2.39.2
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 15:47:33 +0100,
Rob Herring wrote:
>
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Applied now to for-next branch.
thanks,
Takashi